Sperm morphology: assessment, pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and state of the art in 2017

For over 30 years, sperm morphology assessment has been one of the most common tests in evaluation of fertility. This review examines the clinical relevance of sperm morphology assessment in the diagnosis of infertility and in assisted reproductive technology, as well as its analytical reliability. Publications on the pathophysiology, the analytical reliability of the test and its clinical relevance in diagnosis and in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) were evaluated. This review compared and discussed study methodologies and results, including patient characteristics, preparation, smear staining methods and classification systems. The assessment of the percentage of some abnormalities such as for example thin head, amorphous head, or bent or asymmetrical neck is of little clinical use, and their pathophysiology is not well explained as most are physiological traits. Some studies have highlighted correlations between the percentage of normal forms and functional sperm abnormalities, as well as correlations with ability to conceive in vivo and, in some situations, with the success of intra‐uterine insemination (IUI) or conventional IVF. However, except in the case of some specific sperm defects (easy to detect with 99 or 100% of spermatozoa affected) and which are often linked to genetic disorders (globozoospermia, macrocephaly, decapitated sperm syndrome and fibrous sheath dysplasia), sperm morphology assessment has very poor sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of infertility. Moreover, there is very little evidence that indices of multiple sperm defects [sperm deformity index (SDI), teratozoospermia index (TZI), and multiple abnormalities index (MAI)] are relevant. Above all, many publications report a major lack of analytical reliability of this test, mainly in assessment of the details of sperm abnormalities. Many questions arise concerning how and when sperm morphology should be assessed, and how to interpret the thresholds of normal forms. Questions are raised on the real clinical impact of this test.

[1]  E. Page,et al.  The clinical interpretation of 1000 semen analyses among applicants for sterility studies. , 1951, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  R. Z. Gold,et al.  The male factor in fertility and infertility. IV. Sperm morphology in fertile and infertile marriage. , 1951, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  O. Dressler Semen analysis. , 1971, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

[4]  A. Holstein,et al.  [Round headed spermatozoa: a cause of male infertility]. , 1973, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[5]  L. Dubin,et al.  Semen analysis. An office technique. , 1973, Urology.

[6]  P. Camner,et al.  The immotile-cilia syndrome. A congenital ciliary abnormality as an etiologic factor in chronic airway infections and male sterility. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Tóth Reversible toxic effect of salicylazosulfapyridine on semen quality. , 1979, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  D. Mortimer,et al.  Morphological selection of human spermatozoa in vivo and in vitro. , 1982, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[9]  D. Escalier Human spermatozoa with large heads and multiple flagella: a quantitative ultrastructural study of 6 cases , 1983, Biology of the cell.

[10]  A. Trounson,et al.  The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. , 1984, Fertility and sterility.

[11]  W. Chey,et al.  The effects of sulfasalazine on human male fertility potential and seminal prostaglandins. , 1984, The Journal of urology.

[12]  R. Martín,et al.  Analysis of human sperm chromosome complements from a male heterozygous for a reciprocal translocation t(11;22)(q23;q11) , 1984, Clinical genetics.

[13]  P. Jouannet,et al.  Sliding spermatozoa: a dyskinesia responsible for human infertility? , 1985, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  A. Williams,et al.  Scoring sperm morphology from fertile and infertile cigarette smokers using the scanning electron microscope and image analysis. , 1985, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  I. Hirsch,et al.  In vitro fertilization in couples with male factor infertility , 1987, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  C. Lombard,et al.  Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. , 1986, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  H. Grandjean,et al.  Effects of artificial cryptorchidism on sperm morphology. , 1987, Fertility and Sterility.

[18]  M Morshedi,et al.  New method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for human in vitro fertilization. , 1987, Urology.

[19]  W. Franke,et al.  Basic proteins of the perinuclear theca of mammalian spermatozoa and spermatids: a novel class of cytoskeletal elements , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  H. Chemes,et al.  Lack of a head in human spermatozoa from sterile patients: A syndrome associated with impaired fertilization , 1988, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  T. Kruger,et al.  A quick, reliable staining technique for human sperm morphology. , 1987, Archives of andrology.

[22]  D. Liu,et al.  The proportion of human sperm with poor morphology but normal intact acrosomes detected with Pisum sativum agglutinin correlates with fertilization in vitro. , 1988, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  S. Oehninger,et al.  Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. , 1988, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Corrective measures and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization in patients with severe sperm morphology abnormalities. , 1988, Fertility and sterility.

[25]  P. Jouannet,et al.  Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics. , 1988, International journal of andrology.

[26]  N. Skakkebaek,et al.  Prevalence of carcinoma in situ and other histopathological abnormalities in testes of men with a history of cryptorchidism. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[27]  R. Menkveld,et al.  The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. , 1990, Human reproduction.

[28]  E. Nieschlag,et al.  '9 + 0' axoneme in spermatozoa and some nasal cilia of a patient with totally immotile spermatozoa associated with thickened sheath and short midpiece. , 1990, Human reproduction.

[29]  D. Liu,et al.  Relationships between human sperm acrosin, acrosomes, morphology and fertilization in vitro. , 1990, Human reproduction.

[30]  F. Francavilla,et al.  Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of intrauterine insemination in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia. , 1990, Fertility and sterility.

[31]  J. Dumoulin,et al.  Evaluation of human sperm morphology using strict criteria after Diff-Quik staining: correlation of morphology with fertilization in vitro. , 1991, Human reproduction.

[32]  G. Hodgen,et al.  Sperm selection capacity of the human zona pellucida , 1991, Molecular reproduction and development.

[33]  D. Liu,et al.  Morphology of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida of human oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro. , 1992, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[34]  E. Nieschlag,et al.  Subnormal sperm parameters in conventional semen analysis are associated with discrepancies between fertilization and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. , 1992, International journal of andrology.

[35]  N Keiding,et al.  Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. , 1992, BMJ.

[36]  J. Bonde Semen quality in welders exposed to radiant heat. , 1992, British journal of industrial medicine.

[37]  C. Gravance,et al.  Standardization of specimen preparation, staining, and sampling methods improves automated sperm-head morphometry analysis. , 1993, Fertility and sterility.

[38]  H. Seltman,et al.  Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: probing the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population. , 1994, Fertility and sterility.

[39]  D. I. Lewis-Jones,et al.  Evaluation of different sperm function tests as screening methods for male fertilization potential--the value of the sperm migration test. , 1994, Fertility and sterility.

[40]  E. Bosmans,et al.  Teratozoospermia and in-vitro fertilization: a randomized prospective study. , 1994, Human reproduction.

[41]  D. Liu,et al.  Disordered acrosome reaction of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida: a newly discovered sperm defect causing infertility with reduced sperm-zona pellucida penetration and reduced fertilization in vitro. , 1994, Human reproduction.

[42]  F. Comhaire,et al.  Methodological aspects of sperm morphology evaluation: comparison between strict and liberal criteria. , 1994, Fertility and sterility.

[43]  B. Corcóstegui,et al.  Sperm morphology analysis (strict criteria) in male infertility is not a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination with husband's sperm. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[44]  R. Menkveld,et al.  Advantages of strict (Tygerberg) criteria for evaluation of sperm morphology. , 1995, International journal of andrology.

[45]  S. Oehninger,et al.  Value of sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria for prediction of the outcome of artificial (intrauterine) insemination , 2009, Andrologia.

[46]  M. Derde,et al.  The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[47]  P. Matson Andrology: External quality assessment for semen analysis and sperm antibody detection: results of a pilot scheme , 1995 .

[48]  G. Serour,et al.  The effect of sperm parameters on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[49]  J. Parinaud,et al.  Variations in spontaneous and induced acrosome reaction: correlations with semen parameters and in-vitro fertilization results. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[50]  B. Depoorter,et al.  Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to moderate and severe male subfertility in 1995. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[51]  R. Aitken,et al.  Development of an image analysis system to monitor the retention of residual cytoplasm by human spermatozoa: correlation with biochemical markers of the cytoplasmic space, oxidative stress, and sperm function. , 1996, Journal of andrology.

[52]  M. Wikland,et al.  The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is unrelated to 'strict criteria' sperm morphology. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[53]  S. Lanzendorf,et al.  A comparative analysis of embryo implantation potential in patients with severe teratozoospermia undergoing in-vitro fertilization with a high insemination concentration or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[54]  A. Lenzi,et al.  Effects of prolonged autovehicle driving on male reproduction function: a study among taxi drivers. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[55]  C. Taylor,et al.  The sperm deformity index: a reliable predictor of the outcome of oocyte fertilization in vitro. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[56]  W. Gyselaers,et al.  Semen parameters in a fertile versus subfertile population: a need for change in the interpretation of semen testing. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[57]  E. Bosmans,et al.  Results of a questionnaire on sperm morphology assessment. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[58]  C. Lombard,et al.  Effects of different staining and washing procedures on the results of human sperm morphology evaluation by manual and computerised methods , 2009, Andrologia.

[59]  D. Karabinus,et al.  The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[60]  C. Giorgetti,et al.  Teratozoospermia influences fertilization rate in vitro but not embryo quality. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[61]  L. Hamberger,et al.  The relationship between sperm morphology and rates of fertilization, pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in an in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection programme. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[62]  E. Bosmans,et al.  Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[63]  D. Liu,et al.  Calcium ionophore-induced acrosome reaction correlates with fertilization rates in vitro in patients with teratozoospermic semen. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[64]  E. Bosmans,et al.  Multicenter study on reproducibility of sperm morphology assessments. , 1998, Archives of andrology.

[65]  M. Leisner,et al.  Ultrastructural pathology of the sperm flagellum: association between flagellar pathology and fertility prognosis in severely asthenozoospermic men. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[66]  S. Promviengchai,et al.  Sperm morphology evaluated by computer (IVOS) cannot predict the fertilization rate in vitro after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[67]  C. Lombard,et al.  Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. , 1998, Human reproduction update.

[68]  E. Puigdomènech,et al.  Acephalic spermatozoa and abnormal development of the head-neck attachment: a human syndrome of genetic origin. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[69]  E. Clegg,et al.  Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[70]  E. Ernst,et al.  Sperm morphology and IVF, Embryo quality in relation to sperm morphology following the WHO and Krüger's strict criteria , 1999, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[71]  N. Keiding,et al.  Secular and seasonal changes in semen quality among young Danish men: a statistical analysis of semen samples from 1927 donor candidates during 1977-1995. , 1999, International journal of andrology.

[72]  T. K. Jensen,et al.  Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners , 1998, The Lancet.

[73]  D. Franken,et al.  Normal sperm morphology and chromatin packaging: comparison between aniline blue and chromomycin A3 staining , 1999, Andrologia.

[74]  A. Lenzi,et al.  Study of apoptotic DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[75]  P. Kihaile,et al.  Analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in human spermatozoa using multi-colour fluorescence in-situ hybridization. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[76]  G Richoilley,et al.  Computer-assisted assessment of sperm morphology: comparison with conventional techniques. , 2000, International journal of andrology.

[77]  B. A. Keel,et al.  Results of the American Association of Bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme in andrology. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[78]  J. Toppari,et al.  Sperm morphological defects related to environment, lifestyle and medical history of 1001 male partners of pregnant women from four European cities. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[79]  A. Wetzels,et al.  Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[80]  C. Lombard,et al.  Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme , 2001, Andrologia.

[81]  N. Mcclure,et al.  Assessment of DNA integrity and morphology of ejaculated spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men before and after cryopreservation. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[82]  C. Lombard,et al.  A study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: an attempt to develop clinical thresholds. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[83]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Regional differences in semen quality in Europe , 2001, Human reproduction.

[84]  D. Mortimer,et al.  Sperm morphology assessment--historical perspectives and current opinions. , 2001, Journal of andrology.

[85]  L. Yogev,et al.  Intrauterine insemination in male factor subfertility: significance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria , 2001, Andrologia.

[86]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Regional differences in semen quality in Europe , 2001, Human reproduction.

[87]  C. Lombard,et al.  Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. , 2001, Human reproduction update.

[88]  J W Overstreet,et al.  Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[89]  N. Skakkebaek,et al.  Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects , 2001, Human reproduction.

[90]  J. Check,et al.  REEVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATING SPERM MORPHOLOGY USING STRICT CRITERIA , 2002, Archives of andrology.

[91]  Ming-Huei Lin,et al.  Sperm morphology analysis using strict criteria as a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination. , 2002, International journal of andrology.

[92]  N. Keiding,et al.  Time to pregnancy and semen parameters: a cross-sectional study among fertile couples from four European cities. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[93]  S. Oehninger,et al.  Relationship between zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction, sperm morphology, sperm-zona pellucida binding, and in vitro fertilization. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[94]  D. Vanderschueren,et al.  Isolated teratozoospermia and intrauterine insemination. , 2003, Fertility and Sterility.

[95]  J. Auger,et al.  Inter-individual variability in the morphological assessment of human sperm: effect of the level of experience and the use of standard methods. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[96]  Anna-Maria Andersson,et al.  History of febrile illness and variation in semen quality. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[97]  D. Franken African experience with sperm morphology training courses. , 2003, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[98]  G. Lambert,et al.  Sperm changes in men exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls and dibenzofurans. , 2003, JAMA.

[99]  P. Kihaile,et al.  FERTILIZATION RATES OF SMALL-HEAD SPERM IN CONVENTIONAL IVF AND ICSI , 2003, Archives of andrology.

[100]  C. Lombard,et al.  Monitoring technologist reading skills in a sperm morphology quality control program. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[101]  M. Shinohara,et al.  Assessment of the Dominant Abnormal Form Is Useful for Predicting the Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in the Case of Severe Teratozoospermia , 1999, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[102]  D. Franken,et al.  Chromatin Packaging as an Indicator of Human Sperm Dysfunction , 2000, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[103]  H. Møller,et al.  Testicular cancer, cryptorchidism, inguinal hernia, testicular atrophy, and genital malformations: case-control studies in Denmark , 1996, Cancer Causes & Control.

[104]  D. Lamb,et al.  Pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with profound teratospermia. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[105]  Renée H. Martin,et al.  Chromosome segregation into the spermatozoa of two men heterozygous for different reciprocal translocations , 1983, Human Genetics.

[106]  Mitsuaki Suzuki,et al.  Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility. , 2004, International journal of andrology.

[107]  J. Habbema,et al.  Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[108]  M. Beletti,et al.  Comparison between the toluidine blue stain and the Feulgen reaction for evaluation of rabbit sperm chromatin condensation and their relationship with sperm morphology. , 2004, Theriogenology.

[109]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Variation in the frequency and type of sperm chromosomal abnormalities among normal men , 1987, Human Genetics.

[110]  D. Hassiakos,et al.  Impact of isolated teratozoospermia on the outcome of intrauterine insemination. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[111]  D. Barad,et al.  Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination , 1996, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[112]  M. Kurpisz,et al.  Bacterial infection and semen quality. , 2005, Journal of reproductive immunology.

[113]  F. Comhaire,et al.  Accuracy of sperm characteristics in predicting the in vitro fertilizing capacity of semen , 1988, Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

[114]  C. Niederberger Relationship between human semen parameters and deoxyribonucleic acid damage assessed by the neutral comet assay. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[115]  Renée H. Martin,et al.  Is there a relationship between sperm chromosome abnormalities and sperm morphology? , 2006, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[116]  Thore Egeland,et al.  Semen parameters in Norwegian fertile men. , 2006, Journal of andrology.

[117]  Alan Horwich,et al.  Testicular germ-cell cancer , 2006, The Lancet.

[118]  T. Kruger,et al.  Lessons learned from a sperm morphology quality control programme , 2006, Andrologia.

[119]  R. Menkveld,et al.  Oligozoospermia: recent prognosis and the outcome of 73 pregnancies in oligozoospermic couples , 2006, Andrologia.

[120]  R. Bronson,et al.  Ability of abnormally-shaped human spermatozoa to adhere to and penetrate zona-free hamster eggs: correlation with sperm morphology and postincubation motility. , 2007, Journal of andrology.

[121]  C. Metzler-Guillemain,et al.  Reproductive failure in patients with various percentages of macronuclear spermatozoa: high level of aneuploid and polyploid spermatozoa. , 2007, Journal of andrology.

[122]  K. Lundin L’impact de l’analyse de la morphologie du sperme sur le résultat de la FIV , 2007 .

[123]  H. van Bokhoven,et al.  Homozygous mutation in SPATA16 is associated with male infertility in human globozoospermia. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[124]  K. Lundin [The impact of sperm morphology analysis on IVF results]. , 2007, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[125]  G. Tachdjian,et al.  Ultrastructural nuclear defects and increased chromosome aneuploidies in spermatozoa with elongated heads. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[126]  J. Grifo,et al.  Isolated teratozoospermia does not affect in vitro fertilization outcome and is not an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[127]  W. Distler,et al.  Glycodelin binding to human ejaculated spermatozoa is correlated with sperm morphology. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[128]  D. Colleu,et al.  Study of aneuploidy in large-headed, multiple-tailed spermatozoa: case report and review of the literature. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[129]  S. de Mateo,et al.  A common protamine 1 promoter polymorphism (-190 C->A) correlates with abnormal sperm morphology and increased protamine P1/P2 ratio in infertile patients. , 2008, Journal of andrology.

[130]  D. Peak,et al.  The influence of sperm morphology on preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles outcome. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[131]  U. Hipler,et al.  Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[132]  P. Jouk,et al.  The Aurora Kinase C c.144delC mutation causes meiosis I arrest in men and is frequent in the North African population. , 2009, Human molecular genetics.

[133]  A. Elnashar,et al.  Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[134]  M. Bergmann,et al.  Coiled sperm from infertile patients: characteristics, associated factors and biological implication. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[135]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Reproducibility and reliability of repeated semen analyses in male partners of subfertile couples. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[136]  N. Desai,et al.  Does severe teratozoospermia affect blastocyst formation, live birth rate, and other clinical outcome parameters in ICSI cycles? , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[137]  Roelof Menkveld,et al.  Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. , 2010, Asian journal of andrology.

[138]  R. Eliasson Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects. , 2010, Asian journal of andrology.

[139]  K. Yao,et al.  Assessment of sperm morphology without quality control may be meaningless for clinicians. , 2010, Asian journal of andrology.

[140]  J. Auger Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics? , 2010, Asian journal of andrology.

[141]  L. Altucci,et al.  Cannabinoid receptor 1 influences chromatin remodeling in mouse spermatids by affecting content of transition protein 2 mRNA and histone displacement. , 2010, Endocrinology.

[142]  A. Saâd,et al.  Detection of DNA fragmentation and meiotic segregation in human with isolated teratozoospermia , 2010, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[143]  Elizabeth Noonan,et al.  World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. , 2010, Human reproduction update.

[144]  L. Palaoro,et al.  Our experience in sperm morphology assessment. , 2011, Asian journal of andrology.

[145]  A. Weaver,et al.  Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[146]  D. Royère,et al.  Sperm morphology assessment using David's classification: time to switch to strict criteria? Prospective comparative analysis in a selected IVF population. , 2011, International journal of andrology.

[147]  F. E. Kerch,et al.  [Confirmation of the high prevalence in Morocco of the homozygous mutation c.144delC in the aurora kinase C gene (AURKC) in the teratozoospermia with large-headed spermatozoa]. , 2011, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[148]  C. Xiong,et al.  [A comparative study of sperm morphology evaluation criteria by the fifth and fourth editions of WHO Laboratory Manual]. , 2011, Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology.

[149]  R. Nikbakht,et al.  The Influence of Sperm Morphology, Total Motile Sperm Count of Semen and the Number of Motile Sperm Inseminated in Sperm Samples on the Success of Intrauterine Insemination , 2011, International journal of fertility & sterility.

[150]  Roelof Menkveld,et al.  Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. , 2011, Asian journal of andrology.

[151]  N. Desai,et al.  Severe teratozoospermia and its influence on pronuclear morphology, embryonic cleavage and compaction , 2011, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[152]  Z-H Zhang,et al.  Ureaplasma urealyticum in Male Infertility in Jilin Province, North-east China, and Its Relationship with Sperm Morphology , 2011, The Journal of international medical research.

[153]  Ping Yang,et al.  Human t-complex protein 11 (TCP11), a testis-specific gene product, is a potential determinant of the sperm morphology. , 2011, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[154]  DPY19L2 deletion as a major cause of globozoospermia. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[155]  J. Hotaling,et al.  The relationship between isolated teratozoospermia and clinical pregnancy after in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[156]  A. Sefiani,et al.  [Confirmation of the high prevalence in Morocco of the homozygous mutation c.144delC in the aurora kinase C gene (AURKC) in the teratozoospermia with large-headed spermatozoa]. , 2011, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[157]  N. Iqbal,et al.  Globozoospermia is mainly due to DPY19L2 deletion via non-allelic homologous recombination involving two recombination hotspots. , 2012, Human molecular genetics.

[158]  R. Henkel,et al.  Accurate sperm morphology assessment predicts sperm function , 2012, Andrologia.

[159]  A. Agarwal,et al.  An investigation of excess residual cytoplasm in human spermatozoa and its distinction from the cytoplasmic droplet , 2012, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[160]  Chao-Chin Hsu,et al.  SEPT12 mutations cause male infertility with defective sperm annulus , 2012, Human mutation.

[161]  M. Lablans,et al.  Ten years' experience with an external quality control program for semen analysis. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.

[162]  W. Fan,et al.  Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in the case of isolated teratozoospermia , 2012, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[163]  I. Berthaut,et al.  The semen quality of 1158 men with testicular cancer at the time of cryopreservation: results of the French National CECOS Network. , 2012, Journal of andrology.

[164]  Y. Sun,et al.  Does sperm morphology affect the outcome of intrauterine insemination in patients with normal sperm concentration and motility? , 2012, Andrologia.

[165]  P. Jouk,et al.  MLPA and sequence analysis of DPY19L2 reveals point mutations causing globozoospermia. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[166]  A. Saâd,et al.  Aneuploidy rate in spermatozoa of selected men with severe teratozoospermia , 2012, Andrologia.

[167]  A. Zümrütbaş,et al.  The effect of varicocele on sperm morphology and DNA maturity: does acridine orange staining facilitate diagnosis? , 2014, Turkish journal of urology.

[168]  P. Tufféry,et al.  Missense mutations in SLC26A8, encoding a sperm-specific activator of CFTR, are associated with human asthenozoospermia. , 2013, American journal of human genetics.

[169]  Roelof Menkveld,et al.  Sperm morphology assessment using strict (tygerberg) criteria. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[170]  A. Vassault [Interpretation and analysis of the requirements of the standard EN ISO 15189: 2012]. , 2013, Annales de biologie clinique.

[171]  M. Aşoglu,et al.  Does Kruger's strict criteria have prognostic value in predicting ICSI clinical results? , 2013, Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology.

[172]  A. Biggeri,et al.  High variability in results of semen analysis in andrology laboratories in Tuscany (Italy): the experience of an external quality control (EQC) programme , 2013, Andrology.

[173]  I. Natali,et al.  Scoring human sperm morphology using Testsimplets and Diff-Quik slides. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[174]  J. Auger,et al.  Impact of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for testicular germ cell tumors on spermatogenesis and sperm DNA: a multicenter prospective study from the CECOS network. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[175]  G. Lin,et al.  DPY19L2 gene mutations are a major cause of globozoospermia: identification of three novel point mutations. , 2013, Molecular human reproduction.

[176]  Jin-Chun Lu,et al.  Seasonal variation in semen quality in China , 2013, Andrology.

[177]  P. Patrizio,et al.  Reproductive outcomes in patients with male infertility because of Klinefelter's syndrome, Kartagener's syndrome, round-head sperm, dysplasia fibrous sheath, and ‘stump’ tail sperm: an updated literature review , 2013, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[178]  N. Cherry,et al.  Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for poor sperm morphology. , 2014, Human reproduction.

[179]  Xi-feng Xiao,et al.  Probing the Effect of Human Normal Sperm Morphology Rate on Cycle Outcomes and Assisted Reproductive Methods Selection , 2014, PloS one.

[180]  H. Jeng,et al.  Association of cigarette smoking with reproductive hormone levels and semen quality in healthy adult men in Taiwan , 2014, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[181]  N. Thierry-Mieg,et al.  Mutations in DNAH1, which encodes an inner arm heavy chain dynein, lead to male infertility from multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella. , 2014, American journal of human genetics.

[182]  Mingyue Ding,et al.  Variability in the morphologic assessment of human sperm: use of the strict criteria recommended by the World Health Organization in 2010. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[183]  H. Rouba,et al.  Prevalence of the Aurora kinase C c.144delC mutation in infertile Moroccan men. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[184]  L. Lemaitre,et al.  Beneficial effects of varicocele embolization on semen parameters , 2014, Basic and Clinical Andrology.

[185]  E. Strawn,et al.  Impact of sperm morphology on the likelihood of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[186]  L. Chansel-Debordeaux,et al.  Reproductive outcome in globozoospermic men: update and prospects , 2015, Andrology.

[187]  Sungduk Kim,et al.  The relationship between male BMI and waist circumference on semen quality: data from the LIFE study. , 2015, Human reproduction.

[188]  A. Wetzels,et al.  Status of sperm morphology assessment: an evaluation of methodology and clinical value. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[189]  G. B. Louis,et al.  Erratum: The relationship between male BMI and waist circumference on semen quality: Data from the LIFE study (Human Reproduction (2014) 29 (193-200)) , 2015 .

[190]  D. Escalier,et al.  Light microscopy morphological characteristics of the sperm flagellum may be related to axonemal abnormalities , 2015, Andrologia.

[191]  E. Strawn,et al.  Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination , 2015, Andrology.

[192]  P. Ray,et al.  Teratozoospermia: spotlight on the main genetic actors in the human. , 2015, Human reproduction update.

[193]  P. Ray,et al.  Mutations of the aurora kinase C gene causing macrozoospermia are the most frequent genetic cause of male infertility in Algerian men , 2014, Asian journal of andrology.

[194]  D R Franken,et al.  How accurate is sperm morphology as an indicator of sperm function? , 2015, Andrologia.

[195]  J. Parinaud,et al.  Evaluation of intrauterine insemination practices: a 1-year prospective study in seven French assisted reproduction technology centers. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[196]  D. C. Kieslinger,et al.  Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[197]  T. Jenkins,et al.  Teratozoospermia and asthenozoospermia are associated with specific epigenetic signatures , 2016, Andrology.

[198]  J. Auger,et al.  Another look at human sperm morphology. , 2016, Human reproduction.

[199]  S. Ozisik,et al.  The impact of sperm morphology on the outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles with gonadotropins in unexplained and male subfertility. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[200]  R. Bronson Reliability of sperm morphology in predicting function. , 2016, Human reproduction.

[201]  C. Wyns,et al.  Fifteen years of Belgian experience with external quality assessment of semen analysis , 2016, Andrology.

[202]  D. Lamb,et al.  Men with a complete absence of normal sperm morphology exhibit high rates of success without assisted reproduction , 2016, Asian journal of andrology.

[203]  G. B. Buck Louis,et al.  Couples’ body composition and time-to-pregnancy , 2017, Human reproduction.

[204]  N. Gatimel,et al.  Continued existence of significant disparities in the technical practices of sperm morphology assessment and the clinical implications: results of a French questionnaire. , 2017, Fertility and sterility.