Clash of Visions: Analysing Practices of Politicizing the Future

Clashes between visions of the future politicize the future of urgent societal transformations. In the political economy, visions and their promises become resources and their implementation turns into capacities that serve to increase value. Our paper argues that visions as political-economic means influence the transformation processes responding to grand challenges, guide them in certain directions, promote or even hinder them. To shed light on this correlation, we adopt the vision assessment approach of technology assessment (TA), and substantiate and suggest modifications of its analytical perspective to make it suitable for analysing interactions between multiple visions as formative elements in societal transformations on the one hand and as political-economic resources and capacities on the other. Our hypothesis is that the relationship between visions, political economies and transformation can only be examined by looking at power constellations that change through clashes and interactions of multiple and competing visionary practices.

[1]  U. Hoffmann,et al.  Visions of Technology: Social and Institutional Factors Shaping the Development of New Technologies , 1996 .

[2]  K. K. Cetina.  German Translation of Sociality with Objects. Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies , 1998 .

[3]  D. Uhl.  Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment , 2000 .

[4]  K. Weber.  Transforming Large Socio-technical Systems towards Sustainability: On the Role of Users and Future Visions for the Uptake of City Logistics and Combined Heat and Power Generation , 2003 .

[5]  Andreas Lösch,et al.  Means of Communicating Innovations. A Case Study for the Analysis and Assessment of Nanotechnology’s Futuristic Visions , 2006 .

[6]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[7]  Kornelia Konrad,et al.  The social dynamics of expectations: The interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[8]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics , 2007 .

[9]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  Sociality with Objects Social Relations in , 2009 .

[10]  N. Karafyllis.  Facts or Fiction? A Critique on Vision Assessment as a Tool for Technology Assessment , 2009 .

[11]  B. Anderson.  Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies , 2010 .

[12]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[13]  H. Rohracher,et al.  'Energy regions': The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures , 2010 .

[14]  A. Nordmann.  The Age of Technoscience , 2011 .

[15]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Putting the 'smarts' into the smart grid , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[16]  M. Foucault.  The History of Sexuality: An Introduction , 2012 .

[17]  David Tyfield,et al.  A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis , 2012, Minerva.

[18]  Christopher Coenen,et al.  Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement , 2012 .

[19]  Alfred Nordmann,et al.  Visioneering Assessment On the Construction of Tunnel Visions for Technovisionary Research and Policy , 2013 .

[20]  R. Malina.  The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future by W. Patrick McCray (review) , 2013 .

[21]  K. Birch.  The Political Economy of Technoscience: An Emerging Research Agenda , 2013 .

[22]  B. Jessop,et al.  Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in Its Place in Political Economy , 2014 .

[23]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Material participation and the smart grid: Exploring different modes of articulation , 2015 .

[24]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power , 2015 .

[25]  A. Grunwald,et al.  The proliferation of the innovation discourse : On the formation, semantics and social function of the innovation concept , 2015 .

[26]  Christopher Groves,et al.  Performing and Governing the Future in Science and Technology , 2016 .

[27]  Christoph Schneider,et al.  Transforming power/knowledge apparatuses: the smart grid in the German energy transition , 2016 .

[28]  A. Grunwald.  The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2016 .

[29]  K. Birch.  Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy , 2016, Science, technology & human values.

[30]  David Tyfield,et al.  Introduction: beyond crisis in the knowledge economy , 2017 .

[31]  A. Lösch,et al.  How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices , 2017 .

[32]  C. Smith.  Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics , 2017 .

[33]  C. Schneider,et al.  Responsibilization through visions , 2017 .

[34]  B. Krings,et al.  Alternativen als Programm: Plädoyer für einen Perspektivenwechsel in der Technikfolgenabschätzung , 2018 .

[35]  A. Lösch,et al.  Clashing futures as drivers of sociotechnical change. A new approach for vision assessment , 2018 .

[36]  L. Christophorou.  Boundaries of Science , 2018 .

[37]  Jens Beckert.  The exhausted futures of neoliberalism: from promissory legitimacy to social anomy , 2020, Journal of Cultural Economy.

[38]  C. Schneider,et al.  Visions in assemblages: Future-making and governance in FabLabs , 2019, Futures.

[39]  A. Lösch,et al.  Transformationen und konkurrierende Zukünfte. Vision Assessment zwischen Analyse und Intervention , 2021 .