Child restraint seat use behavior and attitude among Japanese mothers.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of the study was to assess associations between child restraint seat use and attitudes among Japanese mothers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mothers whose children were under 6 years of age were recruited through 11 kindergartens located in Kanagawa prefecture, Japan. Questions were developed based on the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Reasoned Action. Past use and future intentions to use, perceived risk of injury, knowledge of safety, attitudes toward use, subjective norms, and safety values related to safety seats were asked. RESULTS A total of 552 complete questionnaires was obtained. Of 500 car owning households, 54.2% used child restraint seats inconsistently on short drives, and 36.4% did so on long drives. Three variables were associated with inconsistent use on short drives: frequent child resistance to sitting in a restraint seat; mothers' feeling hassled by child restraint seat use; and, mothers' agreement with the lack of need to use a restraint seat when another adult is in a car. Two variables were associated with inconsistent use on long drives: lower subjective norm of husband and frequent child resistance. CONCLUSIONS In-car environmental modification and parent education need to be considered to increase child restraint seat use among Japanese households.

[1]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[2]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  A statistical model of individual accident risk prediction using driver record, territory and other biographical factors☆ , 1983 .

[3]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[4]  Kelli England Will,et al.  Child passenger safety and the immunity fallacy: Why what we are doing is not working. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  G Blomquist.  A utility maximization model of driver traffic safety behavior. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health behavior and health education : theory, research, and practice , 1991 .

[7]  D. Sleet,et al.  Behavioral and social sciences theories and models: are they used in unintentional injury prevention research? , 2005, Health education research.

[8]  I. Rosenstock.  Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model , 1974 .

[9]  B E Ebel,et al.  Lessons for increasing awareness and use of booster seats in a Latino community , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[10]  D. Winn,et al.  Development of a Child Safety Seat Hassles Scale in a Largely Low-Income Latino Population , 2006, Pediatrics.

[11]  D. Ronis,et al.  Conditional health threats: health beliefs, decisions, and behaviors among adults. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[12]  C. Skinner,et al.  The health belief model. , 2008 .

[13]  R Gofin,et al.  The use of car restraints by newborns and mothers: knowledge, attitudes and practices. , 1990, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[15]  A C Gielen,et al.  Factors Associated with the Use of Child Restraint Devices , 1984, Health education quarterly.

[16]  D. Sleet,et al.  Application of behavior-change theories and methods to injury prevention. , 2003, Epidemiologic reviews.

[17]  E. K. Moll,et al.  Barriers to booster seat use and strategies to increase their use. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[18]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice , 1993 .