Gait adaptability training is affected by visual dependency

As part of a larger gait adaptability training study, we designed a program that presented combinations of visual flow and support-surface manipulations to investigate the response of healthy adults to walking on a treadmill in novel discordant sensorimotor conditions. A visual dependence score was determined for each subject, and this score was used to explore how visual dependency was linked to locomotor performance (1) during three training sessions and (2) in a new discordant environment presented at the conclusion of training. Performance measures included reaction time (RT), stride frequency (SF), and heart rate (HR), which respectively served as indicators of cognitive load, postural stability, and anxiety. We hypothesized that training would affect performance measures differently for highly visually dependent individuals than for their less visually dependent counterparts. A seemingly unrelated estimation analysis of RT, SF, and HR revealed a significant omnibus interaction of visual dependency by session (p < 0.001), suggesting that the magnitude of differences in these measures across training day 1 (TD1), training day 3 (TD3), and exposure to a novel test is dependent on subjects’ levels of visual dependency. The RT result, in particular, suggested that highly visually dependent subjects successfully trained to one set of sensory discordant conditions but were unable to apply their adapted skills when introduced to a new sensory discordant environment. This finding augments rationale for developing customized gait training programs that are tailored to an individual. It highlights one factor—personal level of visual dependency—to consider when designing training conditions for a subject or patient. Finally, the link between visual dependency and locomotor performance may offer predictive insight regarding which subjects in a normal population will require more training when preparing for specific novel locomotor conditions.

[1]  E. Golomer,et al.  Contribution of neck proprioception to subjective vertical perception among experts in physical activities and untrained women , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  L. Bent,et al.  Increased vestibular contribution to posture control in individuals with chronic headache. , 2009, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[3]  Avi Shupak,et al.  Mal de Debarquement and Posture: Reduced Reliance on Vestibular and Visual Cues , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  Bruce Abernethy,et al.  The attentional demands of preferred and non-preferred gait patterns. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[5]  J. T. Richards,et al.  Dynamic visual acuity during walking after long-duration spaceflight. , 2011, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[6]  R. Craik,et al.  Gait analysis : theory and application , 1995 .

[7]  William H. Gage,et al.  The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Jacob J Bloomberg,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance in Novel Visual Environments Improved by Variable Practice Training , 2005, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  E. Keshner Head-trunk coordination in elderly subjects during linear anterior-posterior translations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Robert V. Kenyon,et al.  Visual motion combined with base of support width reveals variable field dependency in healthy young adults , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  G. Gauchard,et al.  Age-related part taken by attentional cognitive processes in standing postural control in a dual-task context. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[12]  Jacob J Bloomberg,et al.  Strategies of healthy adults walking on a laterally oscillating treadmill. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[13]  Joyce Fung,et al.  Aging and selective sensorimotor strategies in the regulation of upright balance , 2006 .

[14]  B A Kay,et al.  Visual control of posture during walking: functional specificity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  L R Young,et al.  Microgravity enhances the relative contribution of visually-induced motion sensation. , 1990, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  R. Cherng,et al.  Effect of Treadmill Training with Body Weight Support on Gait and Gross Motor Function in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[17]  Rachael D Seidler,et al.  Neural Correlates of Motor Learning, Transfer of Learning, and Learning to Learn , 2010, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[18]  William H Paloski,et al.  Posture, locomotion, spatial orientation, and motion sickness as a function of space flight , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[19]  G B Biederman,et al.  Proprioceptive versus visual control in autistic children , 1983, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[20]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[21]  Jacob J Bloomberg,et al.  Critical features of training that facilitate adaptive generalization of over ground locomotion. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[22]  Jacob J Bloomberg,et al.  Effects of sensorimotor adaptation training on functional mobility in older adults. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[23]  H. White Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models , 1982 .

[24]  N Vuillerme,et al.  The effect of expertise in gymnastics on proprioceptive sensory integration in human subjects , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  Ajitkumar P. Mulavara,et al.  Gait training improves performance in healthy adults exposed to novel sensory discordant conditions , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Luciano Fasotti,et al.  Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Assessing vestibular contributions during changes in gait trajectory , 2005, Neuroreport.

[28]  A Berthoz,et al.  Adaptation as a sensorial profile in trait anxiety: a study with virtual reality. , 2000, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[29]  V. Dietz,et al.  The influence of age on learning a locomotor task , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part II: Effectiveness of a balance rehabilitation program with visual cue deprivation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  N. Vuillerme,et al.  Individual differences in the ability to identify, select and use appropriate frames of reference for perceptuo-motor control , 2010, Neuroscience.

[32]  J J Bloomberg,et al.  Locomotor head-trunk coordination strategies following space flight. , 1997, Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation.

[33]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[34]  J. Boucher,et al.  Balance training following stroke: effects of task-oriented exercises with and without altered sensory input , 2006, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[35]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part I: Balance on dynamic posturography. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.