Artificial neural network model for the assessment of lymph node spread in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES To develop an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict lymph node (LN) spread in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and to describe a clinically useful method for interpreting the ANN's output scores. METHODS A simple, feed-forward ANN was trained and validated using clinical and pathologic data from two institutions (n = 6135 and n = 319). The clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, and prostate-specific antigen level were the input parameters and the presence or absence of LN spread was the output parameter. Patients with similar ANN outputs were grouped and assumed to be part of a cohort. The prevalence of LN spread for each of these patient cohorts was plotted against the range of ANN outputs to create a risk curve. RESULTS The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the first and second validation data sets was 0.81 and 0.77, respectively. At an ANN output cutoff of 0.3, the sensitivity achieved for each validation set was 63.8% and 44.4%; the specificity was 81.5% and 81.3%; the positive predictive value was 13.6% and 6.5%; and the negative predictive value was 98.0% and 98.1%, respectively. The risk curve showed a nearly linear increase (best fit R(2) = 0.972) in the prevalence of LN spread with increases in raw ANN output. CONCLUSIONS The ANN's performance on the two validation data sets suggests a role for ANNs in the accurate clinical staging of patients with prostate cancer. The risk curve provides a clinically useful tool that can be used to give patients a realistic assessment of their risk of LN spread.

[1]  P. Walsh,et al.  Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional update. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[2]  W. Kirkels,et al.  The changing pattern of prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: characteristics of screen detected prostate cancer in a population based screening study. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[3]  K. Cummings,et al.  National trends in the epidemiology of prostate cancer, 1973 to 1994: evidence for the effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen screening. , 1998, Urology.

[4]  W. Catalona,et al.  Clinical and pathological characteristics, and recurrence rates of stage T1c versus T2a or T2b prostate cancer. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[5]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[6]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Prediction of capsular perforation and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[7]  F. Schröder,et al.  The TNM classification of prostate cancer , 1992, The Prostate. Supplement.

[8]  P. Walsh,et al.  Capsular transgression of prostatic carcinoma: evaluation with transrectal US with pathologic correlation. , 1991, Radiology.

[9]  Stone Nn,et al.  Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in the staging of prostate cancer , 1999 .

[10]  Judith E. Dayhoff,et al.  Neural Network Architectures: An Introduction , 1989 .

[11]  D. Bostwick Staging prostate cancer--1997: current methods and limitations. , 1997, European urology.

[12]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Influence of prostate-specific antigen testing on the spectrum of patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy at a large referral practice. , 1998, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  M. Kattan,et al.  The role of digital rectal examination, biopsy Gleason sum and prostate-specific antigen in selecting patients who require pelvic lymph node dissections for prostate cancer. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[14]  M. Frydenberg,et al.  Prostate cancer diagnosis and management , 1997, The Lancet.

[15]  N. Bolton,et al.  Nuclear androgen receptors in the epithelium and stroma of human benign prostatic hypertrophic glands , 1983, The Prostate.

[16]  M W Kattan,et al.  Evaluation of a Nomogram used to predict the pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate carcinoma , 1997, Cancer.

[17]  J. Montie Staging of prostate cancer , 1994, Cancer.

[18]  A. Partin,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control. , 1997, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[19]  T. Stamey,et al.  Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer. , 1999, JAMA.

[20]  D C Young,et al.  An algorithm for predicting nonorgan confined prostate cancer using the results obtained from sextant core biopsies with prostate specific antigen level. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[21]  A W Partin,et al.  The use of artificial intelligence technology to predict lymph node spread in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[22]  A W Partin,et al.  Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. , 1997, JAMA.