Patterns in Population Change and the Organization of the Insect Community Associated with Goldenrod

The extent to which insect communities are organized is poorly understood because few studies have examined both population-level processes and community-level patterns. Furthermore, our view of phy- tophagous insect populations is probably biased by the more frequent attention given to economic pests whose dynamics might be expected to be somewhat exceptional. Herein, we report on the population dynamics and community-level features in a diverse, native fauna of phytophagous insects associated with goldenrod (Solidago altissima), a native perennial plant that forms a dominant, long-persisting element in old-field succession. The data consist of censuses taken in six consecutive years at 16 old fields in the Finger Lakes Region of New York; five additional stands were followed for four consecutive years. Our analyses address two questions: (a) to what extent is the functional structure of the community (as reflected in such attributes to the herbivore load, guild spectrum, and dominance hierarchy) maintained by compensatory changes in the densities of the member species and (b) are certain traits associated with a species' tendency to fluctuate in density or to dominate the community? In general, populations of goldenrod insects fluctuated less than those of insects reported in the literature. Few were abundant; only 7 of the 138 species in the goldenrod fauna ever reached densities at which their biomass exceeded 0.1% of the leaf biomass. The functional structure of the community, as reflected in the total herbivore load and the proportions of that load contributed by various guilds, varied widely in space and time. A small subset of the fauna remained dominant throughout the study; these species, whose populations occa- sionally irrupted, retained their high rank in relative abundance even during those periods when their populations were waning. There was no evidence for compensatory changes in the densities of species within guilds, as would be expected if a relatively distinct set of limiting resources were available to insects with different feeding styles. Species were no more likely to exhibit negative correlations with their guild mates than they were with members of other guilds. There was also little evidence of sporadic or diffuse competition within the fauna as a whole; even during population outbreaks, the dominant species rarely engendered decreases in the biomass or diversity of the remaining species, and increases in the total herbivore load were seldom associated with losses of species from the community. Several species were positively associated with one another on the basis of similar habitat requirements or the use by one species of conditions created by the presence of another. The community was predictable only in the sense that dominant species remained dominant and rare species rare. The abundance and population variability of species were not correlated with such traits as body size, generation time, or host range. Taxon-related trends, on the other hand, stood out; coleopterans tended to be abundant whereas lepidopterans were rare, and hemipterans tended to fluctuate widely whereas dipterans remained relatively constant. Furthermore, species that were clumped in space (onto stems within fields) tended to be abundant and variable. The "boom and bust" dynamics of these aggregating species may be related to the ability of colonies to survive the inroads of generalist predators. The low degree of regional synchrony in the performance of populations at different sites suggests that large-scale, weather-driven fluctuations are un- common. Our analysis of this well-developed, native insect fauna reveals a community that has a somewhat predictable structure that reflects the idiosyncracies of the component species. These species do not fluctuate in an integrated community-structuring manner, but as an outcome of each species performing at its "individualistic" level, the community displays a characteristic dominance hierarchy. The members of this diverse fauna rarely achieve densities at which they compete with one another. Our results are consistent with Hairston, Smith, and Slo- bodkin's hypothesis (1960) which predicts that terrestrial herbivores rarely deplete plant resources to levels at which there is widespread interspecific competition.

[1]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Coping with a Capricious Environment: A Population Study of a Rare Pierid Butterfly , 1985 .

[2]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Size, shape, competition, and community structure in hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) , 1990 .

[3]  S. Pimm,et al.  POPULATION VARIABILITY AND POLYPHAGY IN HERBIVOROUS INSECT COMMUNITIES , 1988 .

[4]  Kenneth E. F. Watt,et al.  Comments on Fluctuations of Animal Populations and Measures of Community Stability , 1964, The Canadian Entomologist.

[5]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  The Guild Composition of Arthropod Communities in Trees , 1982 .

[6]  R. Karban Interspecific Competition Between Folivorous Insects on Erigeron Glaucus , 1986 .

[7]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[8]  J. P. Dempster,et al.  THE NATURAL CONTROL OF POPULATIONS OF BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS , 1983 .

[9]  H. Cornell,et al.  Guild structure in the British arboreal arthropods: is it stable and predictable? , 1989 .

[10]  J. Lawton,et al.  TEMPORAL PATTERNS IN THE HERBIVOROUS INSECTS OF BRACKEN: A TEST OF COMMUNITY PREDICTABILITY , 1989 .

[11]  K. Gaston Patterns in the local and regional dynamics of moth populations , 1988 .

[12]  David F. Rhoades,et al.  Offensive-Defensive Interactions between Herbivores and Plants: Their Relevance in Herbivore Population Dynamics and Ecological Theory , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[13]  P. Werner,et al.  Relationships among Flowering Phenology, Insect Visitors, and Seed‐Set of Individuals: Experimental Studies on Four Co‐occurring Species of Goldenrod (Solidago: Compositae) , 1983 .

[14]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[15]  S. Hurlbert Flower number, flowering time, and reproduction isolation among ten species of SolMago (Compositae). , 1970 .

[16]  Peter B. Landres,et al.  Community Organization of Arboreal Birds in Some Oak Woodlands of Western North America , 1983 .

[17]  R. Denno,et al.  Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems , 1985 .

[18]  Nelson G. Hairston,et al.  Community ecology and salamander guilds , 1987 .

[19]  J. Adams The definition and interpretation of guild structure in ecological communities , 1985 .

[20]  M. Mayer,et al.  The Persistence of Rare Prairie Grasses in Missouri: Environmental Variation Buffered by Reproductive Output of Sparse Species , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[21]  R. B. Root,et al.  Structure of the Encounter between Goldenrod (Solidago Altissima) and Its Diverse Insect Fauna , 1990 .

[22]  S. Stearns,et al.  Phylogenetic approaches in ecology , 1990 .

[23]  John A. Wiens,et al.  The Ecology Of Bird Communities , 1989 .

[24]  J. Morton,et al.  A biosystematic study of the Solidago canadensis (Compositae) complex. I. The Ontario populations , 1982 .

[25]  R. M. Weseloh Influence of Gypsy Moth Egg Mass Dimensions and Microhabitat Distribution on Parasitizaton by Ooencyrtus kuwanai , 1972 .

[26]  W. Lewis ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SHAPES OF ABUNDANCE-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR COEXISTING PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES' , 1977 .

[27]  L. Taylor,et al.  Variance and the large scale spatial stability of aphids, moths and birds. , 1980 .

[28]  Brian A. Maurer,et al.  Body size, ecological dominance and Cope's rule , 1986, Nature.

[29]  M. J. Crawley,et al.  Interspecific competition between insect herbivores: asymmetric competition between cinnabar moth and the ragwort seed‐head fly , 1988 .

[30]  R. B. Root,et al.  Association between Leaf Beetles and Meadow Goldenrods (Solidago spp.) in Central New York , 1980 .

[31]  R. B. Root,et al.  The significance of host patch edges to the colonization and development of Corythucha marmorata (Hemiptera: Tingidae) , 1992 .

[32]  H. Wolda,et al.  Fluctuations in Abundance of Tropical Insects , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[33]  G. A. Mulligan The biology of Canadian weeds , 1979 .

[34]  J. Lawton 6. Non-Competitive Populations, Non-Convergent Communities, and Vacant Niches: The Herbivores of Bracken , 1984 .

[35]  N. Stork,et al.  Species number, species abundance and body length relationships of arboreal beetles in Bornean lowland rain forest trees , 1988 .

[36]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[37]  Ian P. Woiwod,et al.  Temporal stability as a density-dependent species characteristic. , 1980 .

[38]  J. Lawton,et al.  INSECTS ON PLANTS. COMMUNITY PATTERNS AND MECHANISMS. , 1987 .

[39]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  On r- and K-Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[40]  J. Connell,et al.  On the Evidence Needed to Judge Ecological Stability or Persistence , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[41]  J. Lawton,et al.  Patterns in the distribution and abundance of insect populations , 1988, Nature.

[42]  J. Lawton,et al.  Patterns in Body Size, Population Dynamics, and Regional Distribution of Bracken Herbivores , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[43]  L. Taylor,et al.  COMPARATIVE SYNOPTIC DYNAMICS. I. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INTER- AND INTRA-SPECIFIC SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIANCE/MEAN POPULATION PARAMETERS , 1982 .

[44]  A. Joern,et al.  Temporal constancy in grasshopper assemblies (Orthoptera: Acrididae) , 1986 .

[45]  Ian P. Woiwod,et al.  THE DENSITY-DEPENDENCE OF SPATIAL BEHAVIOUR AND THE RARITY OF RANDOMNESS , 1978 .

[46]  R. Gagné The plant-feeding gall midges of North America , 1989 .

[47]  P. Marks On the Origin of the Field Plants of the Northeastern United States , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[48]  E. Evans Community dynamics of prairie grasshoppers subjected to periodic fire: predictable trajectories or random walks in time? , 1988 .

[49]  I. Bradbury,et al.  THE BIOLOGY OF CANADIAN WEEDS.: 45. Solidago canadensis L. , 1980 .

[50]  F. Messina Mirid Fauna Associated with Old-Field Goldenrods (Solidago: Compositae) in Ithaca, N.Y. , 1978 .

[51]  B. Rathcke Competition and Coexistence with A Guild of Herbivorous Insects , 1976 .

[52]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[53]  W. E. Wallner Factors Affecting Insect Population Dynamics: Differences Between Outbreak and Non-Outbreak Species , 1987 .

[54]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Stability from variability , 1990, Nature.

[55]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[56]  R. B. Root Organization of a Plant-Arthropod Association in Simple and Diverse Habitats: The Fauna of Collards (Brassica Oleracea) , 1973 .

[57]  J. Macmahon,et al.  Guilds: The Multiple Meanings of a Concept , 1989 .

[58]  T. Casey,et al.  Patterns of interaction among herbivore species. , 1993 .

[59]  N. Cappuccino Comparative Population Dynamics of Two Goldenrod Aphids: Spatial Patterns and Temporal Constancy. , 1987, Ecology.

[60]  F. Gilbert,et al.  On the abundance of hoverflies (Syrphidae) , 1989 .