Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning: results of 2 year follow up

Background: Screening with low dose chest computed tomographic scanning (LDCCT) may improve survival by identifying early asymptomatic lung cancer. Methods: Four hundred and forty nine high risk subjects were screened with serial LDCCT scanning over 2 years. Fine needle aspiration biopsy was recommended for non-calcified nodules (NCNs) of >10 mm diameter or demonstrating interval growth. Results: NCNs were identified in 111 subjects (24.7%), three of which were lung cancer. The overall prevalence (0.4%) and incidence (1.3%) rates of lung cancer detection were low. Three of the six lung cancers detected in the study were stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer; the remainder were unresectable central tumours. By contrast, eight subjects developed extrathoracic malignancy during the study period and other incidental pathology was noted in 221 subjects (49.2%). Smoking cessation rates at 19% were higher than in the general population, but 60.8% of subjects continued to smoke. Conclusion: LDCCT scanning is useful in detecting early peripheral non-small cell lung cancers but its usefulness as a screening tool is limited by low specificity and by poor sensitivity for central tumours.

[1]  C. Henschke Early lung cancer action project , 2000, Cancer.

[2]  G. Byrnes,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  John Eng,et al.  Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2003, JAMA.

[4]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: I. Application of regional cancer survival model to estimate cancer mortality distribution by site , 2002, BMC Cancer.

[5]  S. Swensen,et al.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[6]  G. McVey,et al.  Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning: results of 2 year follow up , 2005, Thorax.

[7]  S S Smith,et al.  The epidemiology of tobacco use, dependence, and cessation in the United States. , 1999, Primary Care.

[8]  L. Camporota The public health burden of acute lung injury. , 2006 .

[9]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: II. results for the global burden of disease 2000 , 2002, BMC Cancer.

[10]  M. Shilova Specific Features of the Spread of Tuberculosis in Russia at the End of the 20th Century , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  F. Fazio,et al.  Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results , 2003, The Lancet.

[12]  S. Swensen,et al.  Change in smoking status after spiral chest computed tomography scan screening , 2003, Cancer.

[13]  M. Melamed,et al.  The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer. Implications for screening. , 1992, Chest.

[14]  C. Henschke,et al.  Smoking cessation following CT screening for early detection of lung cancer. , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[15]  W. Heindel,et al.  Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers , 2004, European Radiology.

[16]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Early lung cancer action project: annual screening using single-slice helical CT. , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  P. M. Logan,et al.  Lung cancer audit in an Irish teaching hospital , 2004, Irish journal of medical science.

[19]  G. Bepler,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.