Spatial discourse and navigation: an analysis of route directions in the city of Venice

We report four studies in which we investigated the production of spatial discourse designed to help people move around in unfamiliar environments. In Study 1, descriptions of three routes were collected from residents of the city of Venice. Analysis of the descriptions revealed the variety of ways used to describe each route. Typical features of route directions were found, in particular the uneven distribution of the landmarks mentioned, which tended to concentrate at critical points where an orientation problem had to be solved. Study 2 used individual protocols to construct more abstract (‘skeletal’) descriptions, reflecting the essentials needed for navigation. New subjects selected those units of information they judged necessary and sufficient to guide a person travelling along the routes. The contents of the skeletal descriptions were very similar, whether they were established by people familiar with Venice or complete strangers, suggesting that people can judge the relevance of information in route directions, regardless of their knowledge of the environment described. Study 3 showed that the ratings of the communicative value of the original individual protocols also resulted in very similar responses from familiar and unfamiliar judges. Finally, Study 4 assessed the value of individual descriptions for assisting navigation by testing the navigational performance elicited by these descriptions. Subjects unfamiliar with the city of Venice were given skeletal descriptions or descriptions which had been rated ‘good’ or ‘poor’ in the previous study. Navigation with good descriptions gave significantly lower error scores than navigation with poor descriptions, and skeletal descriptions gave scores similar to those of good descriptions. Poor descriptions also resulted in more errors from subjects who tended to use a survey perspective than from subjects expressing a preference for visual memories of landmarks. We suggest that the efficiency of route directions as navigational aids depends not only on their intrinsic characteristics but also on the mode of processing adopted by the users. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  E. Tolman.  Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[2]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[3]  C. Linde,et al.  Spatial Networks as a Site for the Study of Language and Thought. , 1975 .

[4]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[5]  Christopher Riesbeck,et al.  "You Can't Miss it!": Judging the Clarity of Directions , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  P. Thorndyke.  Distance estimation from cognitive maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  B. Tversky.  Distortions in memory for maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Philip L. Pearce,et al.  Route maps: A study of travellers' perceptions of a section of countryside , 1981 .

[9]  W. Klein.  Local deixis in route directions , 1982 .

[10]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Linearization in Describing Spatial Networks , 1982 .

[12]  Veronika Ehrich,et al.  Discourse organization and sentence form: The structure of room descriptions in Dutch∗ , 1983 .

[13]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  E. Lindberg,et al.  Cognitive Mapping of Large-Scale Environments , 1984 .

[15]  Lynn A. Streeter,et al.  How to Tell People Where to Go: Comparing Navigational Aids , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[16]  M. Mascolo,et al.  Effect of semantic clustering on the memory of spatial locations. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  P. Dixon.  The structure of mental plans for following directions. , 1987 .

[18]  Sholl Mj.  Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. , 1987 .

[19]  Eric J. Vanetti,et al.  Communicating Environmental Knowledge , 1988 .

[20]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The role of cognitive maps in spatial decisions , 1989 .

[21]  W. Levelt.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[22]  M. Denis,et al.  Chapter 10 Description of perceived or imagined spatial networks , 1991 .

[23]  P. Lloyd.  Strategies used to communicate route directions by telephone: a comparison of the performance of 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds and adults , 1991, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  Michel Denis,et al.  Analog properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions , 1992 .

[25]  B. Tversky,et al.  Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions , 1992 .

[26]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Comparing Elaboration and Dual Coding Theories: The Case of Maps and Text , 1993 .

[27]  D. Kimura,et al.  Sex differences in route-learning , 1993 .

[28]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[29]  Wolfgang Maass,et al.  Spatial Layout Identification and Incremental Descriptions , 1994 .

[30]  J Pailhous,et al.  Distortions and fluctuations in topographic memory , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[31]  M. de Vega,et al.  Characters and their perspectives in narratives describing spatial environments , 1994 .

[32]  Ann Lickorish,et al.  Graphics in written directions: appreciated by readers but not writers , 1995 .

[33]  Eric Chown,et al.  Prototypes, location, and associative networks (PLAN): Towards a unified theory of cognitive mapping , 1995 .

[34]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Path Selection and Route Preference in Human Navigation: A Progress Report , 1995, COSIT.

[35]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Spatial Perspective in Descriptions , 1996 .

[36]  C. Lawton.  STRATEGIES FOR INDOOR WAYFINDING: THE ROLE OF ORIENTATION , 1996 .

[37]  Marie-Paule Daniel,et al.  Modes of Linearization in the Description of Spatial Configurations , 1996 .

[38]  J. M. Golding,et al.  The process of answering direction-giving questions when someone is lost on a university campus: The role of pragmatics , 1996 .

[39]  B. Tversky,et al.  Perspective in Spatial Descriptions , 1996 .

[40]  S. Levinson,et al.  LANGUAGE AND SPACE , 1996 .

[41]  David J. Bryant,et al.  Representing Space in Language and Perception , 1997 .

[42]  Michel Denis,et al.  Spatial Descriptions as Navigational Aids: A Cognitive Analysis of Route Directions , 1998, Kognitionswissenschaft.