Effective Policy based Management of 3D Mule - An Exploratory Study Towards Developing Student Supportive Policy Considerations

Learning environments that are based on 3D Multi User Virtual Environments (3D MUVE) can be referred as 3D Multi User Learning Environments (3D MULE). 3D MULE used in various educational and research activities show proven success sufficient to warrant their consideration as a mainstream educational paradigm. They introduce a platform for diverse learning activities with a novel set of challenges for teachers and students. Without suitable learning management practices, 3D MULE users can encounter difficulties during their learning interactions through 3D MUVE functions, although the learning environment is dynamic and engaging. To overcome this challenge, we researched learner supportive policy considerations for 3D MULE management. This paper presents an exploratory study with student engagements (N=32) that identifies key factors, self-regulation and environment management, for policy considerations. Moreover, the paper critically examines the importance of constructive alignment of learning activities with the 3D MULE features for useful learning experiences.

[1]  P. Pintrich A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[2]  Alan Miller,et al.  Towards Effective Blended Learning with 3D MUVE - An Analysis of Use Case Implementations for 3D MUVE Learning , 2011, CSEDU.

[3]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Effectiveness of a Virtual Laboratory as a preparatory resource for Distance Education chemistry students , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Colin Allison,et al.  Towards successful 3D virtual learning - a case study on teaching human computer interaction , 2009, 2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST).

[5]  Alan Miller,et al.  The third dimension in open learning , 2011, 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[6]  Alan Miller,et al.  Exploratory Learning for Computer Networking , 2007, ICWL.

[7]  Alan Miller,et al.  Educationally enhanced virtual worlds , 2010, 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[8]  Colin Allison,et al.  Games Methodologies and Immersive Environments for Virtual Fieldwork , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[9]  D. Schunk Commentary on self-regulation in school contexts , 2005 .

[10]  D. Kolb,et al.  Experiential Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions , 2000 .

[11]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[12]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[13]  Alan Miller,et al.  802.11 wireless experiments in a virtual world , 2009, ITiCSE '09.

[14]  P. Pintrich The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[15]  J. Biggs Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[16]  Alan Miller,et al.  Extending the Use of Virtual Worlds as an Educational Platform - Network Island: An Advanced Learning Environment for Teaching Internet Routing Algorithms , 2011, CSEDU.

[17]  R. Gonzalez Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[18]  Carina Girvan,et al.  Identifying an appropriate pedagogy for virtual worlds: A Communal Constructivism case study , 2010, Comput. Educ..