Collinearity impairs local element visual search.

In visual searches, stimuli following the law of good continuity attract attention to the global structure and receive attentional priority. Also, targets that have unique features are of high feature contrast and capture attention in visual search. We report on a salient global structure combined with a high orientation contrast to the background, which actually impairs the search for a local element. In a search display containing 21 × 27 short horizontal element bars, we rotated the orientation of a whole column by 90° so that it stood out as a salient vertical collinear column. Observers searched for a small tilt on one of the elemental bars, and the target only occasionally overlapped with the salient column (overlapping targets) by chance. In other words, the collinear column was not informative about a target search and was task-irrelevant. Our results showed that the target tilt orientation was discerned more slowly and less accurately for overlapping targets than nonoverlapping targets. In five experiments, we demonstrated that collinear grouping on the salient distractor was the major cause of this impairment. Potential mechanisms of how a global structure interacts with perceptual salience are discussed.

[1]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Jon Driver,et al.  lateral interactions , 2004 .

[3]  A. Dale,et al.  The Representation of Illusory and Real Contours in Human Cortical Visual Areas Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Sur,et al.  Orientation Maps of Subjective Contours in Visual Cortex , 1996, Science.

[5]  H. Nothdurft.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Eds L. Itti,et al.  The primary visual cortex creates a bottom-up saliency map , 2005 .

[8]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[9]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Developmental trends in utilizing perceptual closure for grouping of shape: Effects of spatial proximity and collinearity , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[11]  J. Driver,et al.  Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[12]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  Interference with Bottom-Up Feature Detection by Higher-Level Object Recognition , 2007, Current Biology.

[13]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Contour Saliency in Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[14]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Yantis,et al.  Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Zhaoping Li.  A saliency map in primary visual cortex , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Jon Driver,et al.  Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  N. Rubin,et al.  fMRI Activation in Response to Illusory Contours and Salient Regions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2003, Neuron.

[21]  L. Zhaoping,et al.  V1 mechanisms and some figure–ground and border effects , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[22]  R. F Hess,et al.  Contour integration and cortical processing , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[23]  J. Driver,et al.  Task-dependent modulation of target-flanker lateral interactions in vision , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Attention Modulates Contextual Influences in the Primary Visual Cortex of Alert Monkeys , 1999, Neuron.

[25]  S. Shipp.  The brain circuitry of attention , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  L. Itti,et al.  Mechanisms of top-down attention , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture: An Empirical Comparison of Display-Size and Distance Methods , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  R. D. Calkins.  Orientation of Maps , 1909 .

[32]  M. Turatto,et al.  Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Cue-dependent deficits in grating orientation discrimination after V4 lesions in macaques , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[35]  M Dojat,et al.  Moving illusory contours activate primary visual cortex: an fMRI study. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[37]  G. Moraglia,et al.  Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[39]  Norma V. Graham,et al.  Beyond multiple pattern analyzers modeled as linear filters (as classical V1 simple cells): Useful additions of the last 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[40]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Li Jingling,et al.  Change Detection is Easier at Texture Border Bars When They are Parallel to the Border: Evidence for V1 Mechanisms of Bottom-up Salience , 2008, Perception.

[42]  Markus Conci,et al.  Closure of salient regions determines search for a collinear target configuration , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  B. Spehar.  The role of contrast polarity in perceptual closure , 2002, Vision Research.

[44]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.