Learning curves of basic laparoscopic psychomotor skills in SINERGIA VR simulator

PurposeSurgical simulators are currently essential within any laparoscopic training program because they provide a low-stakes, reproducible and reliable environment to acquire basic skills. The purpose of this study is to determine the training learning curve based on different metrics corresponding to five tasks included in SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator.MethodsThirty medical students without surgical experience participated in the study. Five tasks of SINERGIA were included: Coordination, Navigation, Navigation and touch, Accurate grasping and Coordinated pulling. Each participant was trained in SINERGIA. This training consisted of eight sessions (R1–R8) of the five mentioned tasks and was carried out in two consecutive days with four sessions per day. A statistical analysis was made, and the results of R1, R4 and R8 were pair-wise compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significance is considered at P value <0.005.ResultsIn total, 84.38% of the metrics provided by SINERGIA and included in this study show significant differences when comparing R1 and R8. Metrics are mostly improved in the first session of training (75.00% when R1 and R4 are compared vs. 37.50% when R4 and R8 are compared). In tasks Coordination and Navigation and touch, all metrics are improved. On the other hand, Navigation just improves 60% of the analyzed metrics. Most learning curves show an improvement with better results in the fulfillment of the different tasks.ConclusionsLearning curves of metrics that assess the basic psychomotor laparoscopic skills acquired in SINERGIA virtual reality simulator show a faster learning rate during the first part of the training. Nevertheless, eight repetitions of the tasks are not enough to acquire all psychomotor skills that can be trained in SINERGIA. Therefore, and based on these results together with previous works, SINERGIA could be used as training tool with a properly designed training program.

[1]  James Lau,et al.  Another use of the mobile device: warm-up for laparoscopic surgery. , 2011, The Journal of surgical research.

[2]  A. Park,et al.  Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  Mithra Vankipuram,et al.  Cognitive simulators for medical education and training , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[4]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: Didactic design and technical development , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[6]  Marlies P. Schijven,et al.  Distributed versus massed training: efficiency of training psychomotor skills , 2011 .

[7]  Paul G Gauger,et al.  Laparoscopic simulation training with proficiency targets improves practice and performance of novice surgeons. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[8]  Charles J. Teplitz,et al.  The Learning Curve Deskbook: A Reference Guide to Theory, Calculations, and Applications , 1991 .

[9]  G. Fried,et al.  Proving the Value of Simulation in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[10]  G. Muir,et al.  Acquiring surgical skills: a comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery. , 2004, European urology.

[11]  Marie K Stelzer,et al.  Dry lab practice leads to improved laparoscopic performance in the operating room. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[12]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Retracting and seeking movements during laparoscopic goal-oriented movements. Is the shortest path length optimal? , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Teodor P Grantcharov,et al.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[14]  Hong-Bo Wei,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  Sonja N. Buzink,et al.  Criterion-based laparoscopic training reduces total training time , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  Melina C Vassiliou,et al.  Sim one, do one, teach one: considerations in designing training curricula for surgical simulation. , 2011, Journal of surgical education.

[17]  Marlies P Schijven,et al.  Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees? , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[18]  Melina C Vassiliou,et al.  Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[19]  Rudi Campo,et al.  Feasibility and construct validity of a novel laparoscopic skills testing and training model , 2008, Gynecological Surgery.

[20]  Enrique J. Gómez,et al.  Construct and face validity of SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[21]  G. Maddern,et al.  A Systematic Review of Skills Transfer After Surgical Simulation Training , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[22]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  Validation of surgical simulators. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[23]  S. Botden,et al.  What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[24]  Daniel W Birch,et al.  A needs-assessment study for continuing professional development in advanced minimally invasive surgery. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[25]  Enrique J. Gómez,et al.  Validation of SINERGIA as training tool: a randomized study to test the transfer of acquired basic psychomotor skills to LapMentor , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[26]  Kamal Nagpal,et al.  Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Trends of Utilization and Associated Outcomes in England , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[27]  Dennis L. Fowler,et al.  Enabling, Implementing, and Validating Training Methods in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2010, World Journal of Surgery.

[28]  Sabha Ganai,et al.  Virtual Reality and Computer-Enhanced Training Devices Equally Improve Laparoscopic Surgical Skill in Novices , 2008, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[29]  R. Wolterbeek,et al.  Laparoscopic skills simulator: construct validity and establishment of performance standards for residency training , 2008, Gynecological Surgery.

[30]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Simulation for the Operating Room: Proficiency-Based Training as a Paradigm Shift in Surgical Skills Training , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[31]  José B. Pagador,et al.  Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[32]  E. Verdaasdonk,et al.  The influence of different training schedules on the learning of psychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[33]  B. Goff,et al.  Training and assessment in gynaecologic surgery: the role of simulation. , 2010, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[34]  Feza H. Remzi,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.