SNR and functional sensitivity of BOLD and perfusion-based fMRI using arterial spin labeling with spiral SENSE at 3 T.

Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies using parallel imaging to reduce the readout window have reported a loss in temporal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that is less than would be expected given a purely thermal noise model. In this study, the impact of parallel imaging on the noise components and functional sensitivity of both BOLD and perfusion-based fMRI data was investigated. Dual-echo arterial spin labeling data were acquired on five subjects using sensitivity encoding (SENSE), at reduction factors (R) of 1, 2 and 3. Direct recording of cardiac and respiratory activity during data acquisition enabled the retrospective removal of physiological noise. The temporal SNR of the perfusion time series closely followed the thermal noise prediction of a radicalR loss in SNR as the readout window was shortened, with temporal SNR values (relative to the R=1 data) of 0.72 and 0.56 for the R=2 and R=3 data, respectively, after accounting for physiological noise. However, the BOLD temporal SNR decreased more slowly than predicted even after accounting for physiological noise, with relative temporal SNR values of 0.80 and 0.63 for the R=2 and R=3 data, respectively. Spectral analysis revealed that the BOLD trends were dominated by low-frequency fluctuations, which were not dominant in the perfusion data due to signal processing differences. The functional sensitivity, assessed using mean F values over activated regions of interest (ROIs), followed the temporal SNR trends for the BOLD data. However, results for the perfusion data were more dependent on the threshold used for ROI selection, most likely due to the inherently low SNR of functional perfusion data.

[1]  Christine Preibisch,et al.  Functional MRI using sensitivity-encoded echo planar imaging (SENSE-EPI) , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  Lin Li,et al.  Reduced susceptibility effects in perfusion fMRI with single-shot spin-echo EPI acquisitions at 1.5 Tesla. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A signal processing model for arterial spin labeling functional MRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  G. Glover,et al.  Self‐navigated spiral fMRI: Interleaved versus single‐shot , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Application of sensitivity‐encoded echo‐planar imaging for blood oxygen level‐dependent functional brain imaging † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Mark Bydder,et al.  Optimization of sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k‐space trajectories , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[9]  Robert A. Österbauer,et al.  Sensitivity‐encoded single‐shot spiral imaging for reduced susceptibility artifacts in BOLD fMRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Sensitivity-encoded (SENSE) echo planar fMRI at 3T in the medial temporal lobe , 2005, NeuroImage.

[13]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  J B Ra,et al.  Fast imaging using subencoding data sets from multiple detectors , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J. Hogg.  Magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service.

[17]  E C Wong,et al.  Comparison of simultaneously measured perfusion and BOLD signal increases during brain activation with T1‐based tissue identification , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  R. Buxton,et al.  Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II) , 1998 .

[19]  R. Buxton,et al.  Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[20]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[21]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Localized cerebral blood flow response at submillimeter columnar resolution , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Physiological noise reduction for arterial spin labeling functional MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Iterative tomographic image reconstruction using Fourier-based forward and back-projectors , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Jiongjiong Wang,et al.  Continuous ASL (CASL) perfusion MRI with an array coil and parallel imaging at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.