Low-level properties of natural images predict topographic patterns of neural response in the ventral visual pathway.

Neuroimaging research over the past 20 years has begun to reveal a picture of how the human visual system is organized. A key distinction that has arisen from these studies is the difference in the organization of low-level and high-level visual regions. Low-level regions contain topographic maps that are tightly linked to properties of the image. In contrast, high-level visual areas are thought to be arranged in modules that are tightly linked to categorical or semantic information in the image. To date, an unresolved question has been how the strong functional selectivity for object categories in high-level visual regions might arise from the image-based representations found in low-level visual regions. Here, we review recent evidence suggesting that patterns of response in high-level visual areas may be better explained by response to image properties that are characteristic of different object categories.

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Domain specificity in visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  Abstract encoding of auditory objects in cortical activity patterns. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  I. Biederman,et al.  Shape Tuning in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Partially Distributed Representations of Objects and Faces in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Probing intermediate stages of shape processing. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[9]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[11]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Adaptive shape coding for perceptual decisions in the human brain. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[12]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  fMRI of human visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[13]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[14]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  A. Oliva,et al.  A Real-World Size Organization of Object Responses in Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[16]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Real-World Scene Representations in High-Level Visual Cortex: It's the Spaces More Than the Places , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Tom Hartley,et al.  Low-Level Image Properties of Visual Objects Predict Patterns of Neural Response across Category-Selective Regions of the Ventral Visual Pathway , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[19]  Soojin Park,et al.  Disentangling Scene Content from Spatial Boundary: Complementary Roles for the Parahippocampal Place Area and Lateral Occipital Complex in Representing Real-World Scenes , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  L. Tyler,et al.  Object-Specific Semantic Coding in Human Perirhinal Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Vogels,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Tom Hartley,et al.  Patterns of response to visual scenes are linked to the low-level properties of the image , 2014, NeuroImage.

[23]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual Field Maps in Human Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[24]  N. Kanwisher.  Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Amiram Grinvald,et al.  Iso-orientation domains in cat visual cortex are arranged in pinwheel-like patterns , 1991, Nature.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  A Cardinal Orientation Bias in Scene-Selective Visual Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Multivariate Patterns in Object-Selective Cortex Dissociate Perceptual and Physical Shape Similarity , 2008, PLoS biology.

[30]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings , 2000, Current Biology.

[31]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.

[32]  Anitha Pasupathy,et al.  Transformation of shape information in the ventral pathway , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  H. Wilson,et al.  From orientations to objects: Configural processing in the ventral stream. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[35]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  How Distributed Is Visual Category Information in Human Occipito-Temporal Cortex? An fMRI Study , 2002, Neuron.

[36]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[37]  Carlo Baldassi,et al.  Shape Similarity, Better than Semantic Membership, Accounts for the Structure of Visual Object Representations in a Population of Monkey Inferotemporal Neurons , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Dirk B. Walther,et al.  Natural Scene Categories Revealed in Distributed Patterns of Activity in the Human Brain , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  R. Quiroga.  Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  Russell A. Epstein.  Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  J. Peirce.  Understanding mid-level representations in visual processing. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[42]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.

[44]  Natalia Y. Bilenko,et al.  The “Parahippocampal Place Area” Responds Preferentially to High Spatial Frequencies in Humans and Monkeys , 2011, PLoS biology.

[45]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[48]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  The Representation of Biological Classes in the Human Brain , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[50]  Ryan J. Prenger,et al.  Bayesian Reconstruction of Natural Images from Human Brain Activity , 2009, Neuron.

[51]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The functional architecture of the ventral temporal cortex and its role in categorization , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[52]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals , 2002, Current Biology.

[53]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Environmental Knowledge Is Subserved by Separable Dorsal/Ventral Neural Areas , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  N. Kanwisher.  Faces and places: of central (and peripheral) interest , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[56]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[59]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[60]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.