Numerical micromechanical investigation of interfacial strength parameters in a carbon fibre composite material

A finite element micromechanical model of a high strength composite material is subjected to a range of loading conditions to demonstrate its ability to predict failure. An investigation into the relative magnitude and distribution of the normal and shear stresses within the interface region of a single fibre embedded in a matrix region is compared to that of a multi-fibre representative volume element, where the fibre placement is statistically equivalent to that of a real material. A study is subsequently undertaken in which the relative magnitudes of the shear and normal strengths of the fibre–matrix interface are varied under transverse tension and shear. The results are interpreted with relation to the yield strength of the matrix. The predicted performance of the composite is shown to compare well with published experimental data, under transverse tension and in-plane shear. It is concluded that a single set of interface strength parameters can be used to represent the behaviour of the composite material. The results also show that interfacial shear strengths are expected to be equal, and higher than the interfacial normal strength.

[1]  L. Berglund,et al.  Transverse single-fibre test for interfacial debonding in composites: 2. Modelling , 1997 .

[2]  Conor T. McCarthy,et al.  A micromechanical study on the effect of intra-ply properties on transverse shear fracture in fibre reinforced composites , 2011 .

[3]  Conor T. McCarthy,et al.  Micromechanical modelling of the transverse damage behaviour in fibre reinforced composites , 2011 .

[4]  Masaki Hojo,et al.  Evaluation of interfacial strength in CF/epoxies using FEM and in-situ experiments , 2006 .

[5]  J. Karger‐Kocsis,et al.  Effects of fiber/matrix adhesion on off-axis mechanical response in carbon-fiber/epoxyresin composites , 1995 .

[6]  M. Romanowicz.  Effect of interfacial debonding on the failure behavior in a fiber-reinforced composite subjected to transverse tension , 2009 .

[7]  C. McCarthy,et al.  Investigation of strain hardening effects under in-plane shear of unidirectional composite materials , 2012 .

[8]  R. E. Robertson,et al.  The Physics of Glassy Polymers , 1973 .

[9]  Carlos González,et al.  Prediction of the failure locus of C/PEEK composites under transverse compression and longitudinal shear through computational micromechanics , 2008 .

[10]  T. Okabe,et al.  A periodic unit-cell simulation of fiber arrangement dependence on the transverse tensile failure in unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced composites , 2011 .

[11]  The Mullins Effect in a Pure Shear , 2000 .

[12]  Conor T. McCarthy,et al.  A combined experimental–numerical approach for generating statistically equivalent fibre distributions for high strength laminated composite materials , 2010 .

[13]  M. A. McCarthy,et al.  Identification of Damage and Plasticity Parameters for Continuum Damage Mechanics Modelling of Carbon and Glass Fibre‐Reinforced Composite Materials , 2011 .

[14]  Conor T. McCarthy,et al.  A cubic spline implementation of non-linear shear behaviour in three-dimensional progressive damage models for composite laminates , 2010 .

[15]  P. Lesne,et al.  Combined effects of the fibre distribution and of the fibre matrix or interphase matrix transverse modulus ratio on the possible fracture modes of unidirectional composites submitted to a transverse loading , 1995 .

[16]  J. Llorca,et al.  Influence of the loading path on the strength of fiber-reinforced composites subjected to transverse compression and shear , 2008 .

[17]  Carlos González,et al.  Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers under transverse compression: Microscopic mechanisms and modeling , 2007 .

[18]  T. Peijs,et al.  Deformation, yield and fracture of unidirectional composites in transverse loading: 2. Influence of fibre–matrix adhesion , 1999 .

[19]  M. Benzeggagh,et al.  Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus , 1996 .

[20]  T. Adachi,et al.  Effect of fiber array irregularities on microscopic interfacial normal stress states of transversely loaded UD-CFRP from viewpoint of failure initiation , 2009 .

[21]  Tomas Ireman,et al.  Three-dimensional stress analysis of bolted single-lap composite joints , 1998 .

[22]  Carlos González,et al.  Effect of fiber, matrix and interface properties on the in-plane shear deformation of carbon-fiber reinforced composites , 2010 .

[23]  Somnath Ghosh,et al.  Interfacial debonding analysis in multiple fiber reinforced composites , 2000 .

[24]  M. Rink,et al.  Yield criteria for amorphous glassy polymers , 1997 .

[25]  Geometrical range of microscopic stress distribution change due to fibre array irregularities for thermally and transversely loaded CF/epoxy composites , 2010 .

[26]  Boming Zhang,et al.  A virtual experimental approach to estimate composite mechanical properties: Modeling with an explicit finite element method , 2010 .