Late First-Trimester Placental Disruption and Subsequent Gestational Hypertension/Preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential relationship between placental disruption in weeks 13 and 14 and the subsequent development of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. METHODS: Using subjects recruited during a randomized trial funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, which compared early amniocentesis and late transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in weeks 13 and 14, rates of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia were compared between cases with varying degrees of placental disruption. RESULTS: A total of 3,698 of 3,775 randomized subjects had cytogenetically normal pregnancies and were analyzed. A significantly higher rate of hypertension/preeclampsia was observed in the late CVS group (5.4%, n = 1,878) compared with the early amniocentesis cohort (3.5%, n = 1,820; P = .005). This difference persisted after controlling for maternal age, body mass index, parity, previous preterm delivery, smoking, and fetal gender. Early amniocentesis cases were further stratified on the basis of whether the placenta had been penetrated (n = 460) or not (n = 1,360). Risk of hypertensive complications was lowest if the placenta was not traversed (3.4%), greater with placental penetration (3.9%), and highest when the placenta was directly sampled during CVS (5.4%, P = .02). CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that focal disruption of the placenta at 13–14 weeks may increase the risk of hypertension/preeclampsia. These findings provide support for the theory that disturbances in early placentation lead subsequently to maternal hypertension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-1

[1]  J. Philip,et al.  Late First-Trimester Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis: Results of an International Randomized Trial , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  R. Snijders,et al.  First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18 , 2003 .

[3]  Vivien L Pan,et al.  Molecular Epidemiology of Preeclampsia , 2003, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[4]  N. Nevin,et al.  Transplacental early amniocentesis and pregnancy outcome , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  N. Okun,et al.  Randomised trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesis , 1998, The Lancet.

[6]  C. Lundsteen,et al.  Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling , 1997, The Lancet.

[7]  M. Hammar,et al.  Transplacental needle passage and other risk‐factors associated with second trimester amniocentesis , 1997, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  M. Caplan,et al.  Endothelin-1-induced placental and fetal growth restriction in the rat. , 1997, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine.

[9]  C. Giorlandino,et al.  Transplacental amniocentesis: Is it really a higher‐risk procedure? , 1994, Prenatal diagnosis.

[10]  C. Yallampalli,et al.  Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis in rats during pregnancy produces signs similar to those of preeclampsia. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  C. Lundsteen,et al.  Randomised comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling , 1992, The Lancet.

[12]  D. Ledbetter,et al.  A randomized comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Chorionic-Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis Study Group. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M. Sandstrom,et al.  Early Amniocentesis: Report of 407 Cases With Neonatal Follow-Up , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  J. Simpson,et al.  Fetomaternal transfusion depends on amount of chorionic villi aspirated but not on method of chorionic villus sampling. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  S. Samuels,et al.  Amniocentesis before 15 weeks' gestation: outcome, risks, and technical problems. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  Ann Tabor,et al.  RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMEN , 1986, The Lancet.

[17]  M. Gravett,et al.  Genetic Amniocentesis: Significance of Intraamniotic Bleeding and Placental Location , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  J. Crane,et al.  Genetic amniocentesis: impact of placental position upon the risk of pregnancy loss. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  N. Saurbrey,et al.  Elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein caused by midtrimester amniocentesis: a prognostic factor. , 1983, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  R. Resnik,et al.  Reproductive outcome following amniocentesis for genetic indications. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  E. Gerdts Letter: Cervical cancer and gonorrhoea. , 1974, Lancet.

[22]  R. Cooke The national institute of child health and human development , 1962 .