Testing Protocols for the Internet of Things on the EuWIn Platform

Several approaches have been considered by research community as possible enablers for the Internet of Things (IoT) implementation. This paper presents the results obtained by testing and comparing three different solutions. In particular, we compare a centralized solution based on software defined network (SDN), called software defined wireless networking (SDWN), with two standard and distributed solutions, that are ZigBee and IPv6 over low-power wireless personal area networks (6LoWPAN). SDWN uses a centralized network layer protocol, where routing policies are defined by an external controller that can be positioned anywhere in the network. The other two solutions are actually the most common protocol stacks for wireless sensor networks, and they both use a distributed routing protocol. The comparison is achieved by experimentations performed on the European Laboratory of Wireless Communications for the Future Internet (EuWIn) platform developed within the network of excellence, NEWCOM#. Results show that SDWN is the best solution in static or quasi-static environments, while the performance degrades in highly dynamic conditions. However, ZigBee has a good reactivity to environmental changes. This paper reports the evaluation of several performance metrics, including packet loss rate, round-trip-time, and overhead generated in the network, under different conditions and considering different kinds of traffic.

[1]  Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Towards the Implementation of IoT for Environmental Condition Monitoring in Homes , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[2]  Lucia Lo Bello,et al.  Comparative assessments of IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee and 6LoWPAN for low-power industrial WSNs in realistic scenarios , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems.

[3]  John A. Stankovic,et al.  Research Directions for the Internet of Things , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[4]  Hannes Tschofenig,et al.  Securing the Internet of Things: A Standardization Perspective , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[5]  Olivier Bonaventure,et al.  On link estimation in dense RPL deployments , 2012, 37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks - Workshops.

[6]  Irek Defée,et al.  A Non-beaconing ZigBee Network Implementation and Performance Study , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[7]  Chiara Buratti,et al.  Testing the impact of Wi-Fi interference on Zigbee networks , 2014, 2014 Euro Med Telco Conference (EMTC).

[8]  Nico Bayer,et al.  OpenFlow for Wireless Mesh Networks , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN).

[9]  Arif Mahmud,et al.  Exploitation of OpenFlow in wireless sensor networks , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology.

[10]  Karel Heurtefeux,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a routing protocol for wireless sensor networks: RPL under study , 2013, 6th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC).

[11]  Song Guo,et al.  A software defined wireless sensor network , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[12]  Chiara Buratti,et al.  A ZigBee Smart Energy Implementation for Energy Efficient Buildings , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[13]  J. Antonio García-Macías,et al.  An experimental analysis of Zigbee networks , 2008, 2008 33rd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN).

[14]  Giacomo Morabito,et al.  Software Defined Wireless Networks: Unbridling SDNs , 2012, 2012 European Workshop on Software Defined Networking.

[15]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[16]  Paolo Pagano,et al.  6LoWPAN conform ITS-Station for non safety-critical services and applications , 2013, 2013 13th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST).

[17]  Philip Levis,et al.  RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2012, RFC.

[18]  Maurizio A. Spirito,et al.  On the performance of ZigBee Pro and ZigBee IP in IEEE 802.15.4 networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[19]  Gabriel Montenegro,et al.  IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs): Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement, and Goals , 2007, RFC.

[20]  Lianfen Huang,et al.  Design and implementation of wireless Smart-home sensor network based on ZigBee protocol , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems.

[21]  Davide Dardari,et al.  The EuWIn Testbed for 802.15.4/Zigbee Networks: From the Simulation to the Real World , 2013, ISWCS.

[22]  Yoram Haddad,et al.  Wireless Software Defined Networks: Challenges and opportunities , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronic Systems (COMCAS 2013).

[23]  Kevin I-Kai Wang,et al.  A 6LoWPAN implementation for memory constrained and power efficient wireless sensor nodes , 2013, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[24]  Dominique Guinard,et al.  Embedding internet technology for home automation , 2010, 2010 IEEE 15th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2010).