The place of personal writing in a PhD thesis: epistemological and methodological considerations

This paper reports on a particular approach to doing a doctorate in which the first author has used personal writing to increase the relevance, autonomy and quality of her learning and to allow her to present her study, her personal reactions to the study and the experiences that have led her to the study in one thesis. The personal writing consisted of reflective and critical journal and letter writing through which Mary dealt with the affective, social and moral factors she believed to be an integral part of deep learning in a social science. The paper describes how, as well as having consequences for her research on improving autonomy, motivation and learning in Year 8 science students, this has led her to present her PhD thesis on two levels: science education and narrative.

[1]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The Practice of constructivism in science education , 1993 .

[2]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  Development and Dilemmas in Science Education. , 1988 .

[3]  Lawrence Stenhouse,et al.  Curriculum Research and Development in Action , 1979 .

[4]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning in science : the implications of children's science , 1985 .

[5]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[6]  C. Sutton,et al.  Words, Science and Learning , 1992 .

[7]  R. Rorty.  Habermas and Lyotard on postmodernity , 1991 .

[8]  Beau Jones,et al.  Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction , 1990 .

[9]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change , 1993 .

[10]  John Biggs.  Teaching for learning : the view from cognitive psychology , 1991 .

[11]  S. Kemmis,et al.  Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research , 1986 .

[12]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[13]  Mike Watts,et al.  Constructivism in the Classroom: enabling conceptual change by words and deeds , 1987 .

[14]  John R. Baird,et al.  Learning from the PEEL experience , 1992 .

[15]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. , 1990 .

[16]  Virginia Richardson,et al.  Handbook of Research on Teaching , 2001 .

[17]  Sue Dockett,et al.  Australian association for research in education , 1989 .

[18]  F. Michael Connelly,et al.  Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry , 1990 .

[19]  Richard T. White,et al.  Metalearning and conceptual change , 1989 .

[20]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[21]  J. Baird,et al.  Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: a classroom study , 1986 .

[22]  S. Paris,et al.  How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. , 1990 .

[23]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[24]  D. Pugh,et al.  How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors , 1994 .

[25]  J. Bruner.  Acts of meaning , 1990 .