Identifying farmer attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) crops in Scotland: Are they pro - or anti-GM?

[1]  Lynn A. Maguire,et al.  Understanding Participant Perspectives: Q-Methodology in National Forest Management , 1998 .

[2]  C. Levin,et al.  CULTIVATING NUTRITION: A SURVEY OF VIEWPOINTS ON INTEGRATING AGRICULTURE AND NUTRITION , 2003 .

[3]  Dane Scott.  Science and the Consequences of Mistruct: Lessons from Recent GM Controversies , 2003 .

[4]  K. Klonsky,et al.  Farmer goals and management styles: Implications for advancing biologically based agriculture , 2006 .

[5]  J. B. Dent,et al.  Empirical models of farmer behaviour using psychological, social and economic variables. Part I: linear modelling , 1998 .

[6]  P. Stern,et al.  Participation by Local Governmental Officials in Watershed Management Planning , 2003 .

[7]  B. B Davies,et al.  Exploring environmental perspectives in lowland agriculture: A Q methodology study in East Anglia, UK , 2007 .

[8]  A. Gray.  Ecology and government policies: the GM crop debate* , 2004 .

[9]  Rob Krueger,et al.  Beyond Bias? The Promise and Limits of Q Method in Human Geography , 2000 .

[10]  J. Fairweather,et al.  New Zealand Farmer and Grower Intentions to Use Gene Technology: Results from a Resurvey , 2003 .

[11]  G. Walter.  Images of Success: How Illinois Farmers Define the Successful Farmer1 , 2010 .

[12]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Converging Networks and Clashing Stories: South Africa's Agricultural Biotechnology Debate , 2004 .

[13]  Sally Brooks.  Biotechnology and the Politics of Truth: From the Green Revolution to an Evergreen Revolution , 2005 .

[14]  George Gaskell,et al.  Europeans and biotechnology in 2002 - Eurobarometer 58.0 : A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project "Life Sciences in European Society" , 2003 .

[15]  Mark Chong,et al.  Perception of the risks and benefits of Bt eggplant by Indian farmers , 2005 .

[16]  P. Robbins,et al.  The Practical Politics of Knowing: State Environmental Knowledge and Local Political Economy* , 2000 .

[17]  D. Gibbs,et al.  Competitiveness versus ‘clean and green’? The regulation and governance of GMOs in Australia and the UK , 2008 .

[18]  Cultural theory and plural rationalities: perspectives on GM among UK scientists , 2003 .

[19]  Kimberly L. Byrd.  Mirrors and Metaphors: Contemporary Narratives of the Wolf in Minnesota , 2002 .

[20]  Birgitte Rasmussen,et al.  Refining the debate on GM crops using technological foresight—the Danish experience , 2005 .

[21]  Les Levidow,et al.  GM crops on trial: Technological development as a real-world experiment , 2007 .

[22]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Policy Beliefs in Spatial Decisions: Contrasting Core Beliefs Concerning Space-making for Waste Infrastructure , 2004 .

[23]  John Barry,et al.  Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology , 1999 .

[24]  P. Swedeen,et al.  Post-normal science in practice: A Q study of the potential for sustainable forestry in Washington State, USA , 2006 .

[25]  C. Herrick.  ‘Cultures of GM’: discourses of risk and labelling of GMOs in the UK and EU , 2005 .

[26]  Steven R. Brown.  A Primer on Q Methodology , 1993, Operant Subjectivity.

[27]  Thomas A. Burnham,et al.  CONSUMER RESPONSE TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: MARKET SEGMENT ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCERS AND POLICY MAKERS , 2001 .

[28]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Structuring subjectivities? Using Q methodology in human geography , 2005 .

[29]  D. Pelletier,et al.  Moving from Debate to Dialogue About Genetically Engineered Foods and Crops: Insights from a Land Grant University , 2001 .