Patient-specific finite element modeling of the Cardiokinetix Parachute® device: effects on left ventricular wall stress and function

Abstract The Parachute® (Cardiokinetix, Inc., Menlo Park, California) is a catheter-based device intended to reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after antero-apical myocardial infarction. When deployed, the device partitions the LV into upper and lower chambers. To simulate its mechanical effects, we created a finite element LV model based on computed tomography (CT) images from a patient before and 6 months after Parachute® implantation. Acute mechanical effects were determined by in silico device implantation (VIRTUAL-Parachute). Chronic effects of the device were determined by adjusting the diastolic and systolic material parameters to better match the 6-month post-implantation CT data and LV pressure data at end-diastole (ED) (POST-OP). Regional myofiber stress and pump function were calculated in each case. The principal finding is that VIRTUAL-Parachute was associated with a 61.2 % reduction in the lower chamber myofiber stress at ED. The POST-OP model was associated with a decrease in LV diastolic stiffness and a larger reduction in myofiber stress at the upper (27.1 %) and lower chamber (78.4 %) at ED. Myofiber stress at end-systole and stroke volume was little changed in the POST-OP case. These results suggest that the primary mechanism of Parachute® is a reduction in ED myofiber stress, which may reverse eccentric post-infarct LV hypertrophy.

[1]  A. McCulloch,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of left ventricular mechanics in the beating dog heart. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  David Saloner,et al.  A computationally efficient formal optimization of regional myocardial contractility in a sheep with left ventricular aneurysm. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  W Grossman,et al.  Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. , 1975, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  David Saloner,et al.  Regional left ventricular myocardial contractility and stress in a finite element model of posterobasal myocardial infarction. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  J. Ross,et al.  Fiber Orientation in the Canine Left Ventricle during Diastole and Systole , 1969, Circulation research.

[6]  Robert C Gorman,et al.  Effect of ventricular size and patch stiffness in surgical anterior ventricular restoration: a finite element model study. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  W. Abraham,et al.  Percutaneous left ventricular partitioning in patients with chronic heart failure and a prior anterior myocardial infarction: Results of the PercutAneous Ventricular RestorAtion in Chronic Heart failUre PaTiEnts Trial. , 2012, American heart journal.

[8]  Edward W Hsu,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element stress analysis after linear repair of left ventricular aneurysm. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  Robert C Gorman,et al.  Akinetic myocardial infarcts must contain contracting myocytes: finite-element model study. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[10]  Christopher M O'Connor,et al.  Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Richard B Thompson,et al.  Fast measurement of intracardiac pressure differences with 2D breath‐hold phase‐contrast MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Lik Chuan Lee,et al.  First evidence of depressed contractility in the border zone of a human myocardial infarction. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  J. Guccione,et al.  MRI-based finite-element analysis of left ventricular aneurysm. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[14]  V. Mitrović,et al.  Percutaneous implantation of the left ventricular partitioning device for chronic heart failure: a pilot study with 1‐year follow‐up , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[15]  S. Chugh,et al.  Isolated myocyte contractile function is normal in postinfarct remodeled rat heart with systolic dysfunction. , 1997, Circulation.

[16]  Elliot R. McVeigh,et al.  Regional cardiac function assessment in 4D CT: Comparison between SQUEEZ and ejection fraction , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  N Westerhof,et al.  Measurement of left ventricular wall stress. , 1980, Cardiovascular research.

[18]  Michael Dae,et al.  Percutaneous implantation of an intraventricular device for the treatment of heart failure: experimental results and proof of concept. , 2009, Journal of cardiac failure.

[19]  S. Kische,et al.  Left ventricular partitioning device in a patient with chronic heart failure: short-term clinical follow-up. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[20]  Elliot R. McVeigh,et al.  A New Method for Cardiac Computed Tomography Regional Function Assessment: Stretch Quantifier for Endocardial Engraved Zones (SQUEEZ) , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[21]  Robert C Gorman,et al.  Extension of borderzone myocardium in postinfarction dilated cardiomyopathy. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  A D McCulloch,et al.  Mechanics of active contraction in cardiac muscle: Part II--Cylindrical models of the systolic left ventricle. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  David Saloner,et al.  A novel method for quantifying in-vivo regional left ventricular myocardial contractility in the border zone of a myocardial infarction. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  R. Felix,et al.  Myocardial viability assessment in patients with highly impaired left ventricular function: comparison of delayed enhancement, dobutamine stress MRI, end-diastolic wall thickness, and TI201-SPECT with functional recovery after revascularization , 2005, European Radiology.

[25]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Computational modeling of LDL and albumin transport in an in vivo CT image-based human right coronary artery. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.