The Preservation of Complex Objects Volume 2: Software Art

It is a pleasure to be invited to offer a short preface to this second volume in the POCOS series. POCOS is an outward-looking and thoughtful project which addresses topics of significant complexity for the preservation of digital collections. Preservation is challenging enough for relatively well-understood and self-contained data types like images and documents but the digital estate is increasingly about sophisticated interactions and interdependencies between software, hardware and people. Our digital memory is growing in scale, our interactions with it are growing more sophisticated, and the ways in which elements are constructed are growing ever more subtle. So the challenge is not necessarily getting easier the more we know about it. Those concerned with safeguarding our digital legacy must never fall into the trap of constraining digital creativity-but nor should they be so complacent as to think they can afford to ignore change. Instead of waiting for inspiration to come through introspection or individual genius, POCOS invited, persuaded and cajoled many people to consider the transience of our digital heritage. Three symposia followed, on broad themes of visualisation, software art and virtual worlds. Creators, policy makers, conservators and collection managers shared their aspirations, expectations, priorities and limitations. The resulting reports will become a lasting contribution-perhaps even a roadmap-for research and development. Although those behind it would never be so grand to claim it themselves, it has all the best elements of a 'grand challenges' initiative. This volume considers the preservation of software art. At first inspection, preservation of software art may seem like an esoteric concern for ephemeral objects. But, as with all of POCOS, it challenges many of our expectations about collection management and preservation. There are complex technical challenges about the interdependencies of software, operating systems, hardware and users. It introduces the inter-subjectivity of meaning and the contexts of performance which defy simplistic approaches to documentation and representation. It crosses the boundaries of institutional genre and raises disconcerting questions about policy and competence. So there is a real sense that software art is a topic for the avant-garde of digital preservation: it pushes the boundaries not for its own sake but in order that all can progress, It was appropriate that the POCOS symposium on software art should assemble at The Lighthouse in Glasgow. Formerly the home to the Glasgow Herald newspaper, The Lighthouse was designed by John Keppie whose able apprentice-Charles Rennie Mackintosh-has created an enduring …

[1]  Margaret Hedstrom,et al.  Significant properties of digital objects: definitions, applications, implications ( 1 ) , 1995 .

[2]  Carl Honoré,et al.  In Praise of Slow : How a Worldwide Movement Is Challenging the Cult of Speed , 2004 .

[3]  J. H. Bowman British Librarianship and Information Work 2001–2005 , 2012 .

[4]  Sarah Higgins,et al.  The dcc curation lifecycle model , 2008, JCDL '08.

[5]  Rob Kling,et al.  Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations , 1987 .

[6]  T. Bennett The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics , 1995 .

[7]  E. Hermens,et al.  Art, Conservation and Authenticities: Material, Concept, Context , 2009 .

[8]  MPhil PhD Linda Candy BA,et al.  Explorations in Art and Technology , 2002, Springer London.

[9]  Andrew Frost New Media Art , 2005 .

[10]  Richard Rinehart MOAC - A Report on Integrating Museum and Archive Access in the Online Archive of California , 2003, D Lib Mag..

[11]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Social Impact , 2019, Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.

[12]  Michael Utvich The Circular Page , 2004 .

[13]  Seamus Ross,et al.  Theoretical Discussions on Digital Representations of Performance , 2010 .

[14]  John Whalen,et al.  The collaboration imperative. , 2014, Harvard business review.

[15]  David L. Giaretta Advanced Digital Preservation , 2011 .

[16]  Adam Farquhar,et al.  Significance Is in the Eye of the Stakeholder , 2009, ECDL.

[17]  Hedley Swain,et al.  Museum revolutions: how museums change and are changed , 2010 .

[18]  Stuart Fleming,et al.  Authenticity in art , 1976 .

[19]  Janez Strehovec,et al.  New media art as research: art-making beyond the autonomy of art and aesthetics , 2009 .

[20]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[21]  Christiane Paul Whitney Challenges for a Ubiquitous Museum : Presenting and Preserving New Media , 2004 .

[22]  Martin Blazeby The Preservation of Complex Objects , 2012 .

[23]  Douglas Brown Art of the Electronic Age , 1997 .

[24]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Technologies as cultural artefacts , 1996 .

[25]  Olav W. Bertelsen,et al.  Criticism as an approach to interface aesthetics , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[26]  Alexander Kulik Building on Realism and Magic for Designing 3D Interaction Techniques , 2009, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[27]  J. Rugg Issues in curating contemporary art and performance , 2007 .

[28]  N. James Preservation , 2002, Antiquity.

[29]  Peter Schlichtiger Closely Coupled Systems , 1991, Operating Systems of the 90s and Beyond.

[30]  Christine L. Liao Avatars, Second Life, and New Media Art: The Challenge for Contemporary Art Education , 2008 .

[31]  Manfred Thaller,et al.  Same Same But Different - Comparing Rendering Environments for Interactive Digital Objects , 2010, EuroMed.

[32]  Tim Ingold,et al.  The textility of making , 2010 .

[33]  J. Trant Emerging convergence? Thoughts on museums, archives, libraries, and professional training , 2009 .

[34]  M. Magruder Transitional space(s): Creation, collaboration and improvisation within shared virtual/physical environments , 2011 .

[35]  Corinne Jörgensen,et al.  Partnerships and Collaboration among Public Libraries, Public Broadcast Media, and Museums: Current Context and Future Potential , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[36]  Bonnie Mak,et al.  Constructions of Authenticity , 2007, Libr. Trends.

[37]  Astrid Mager,et al.  Media Archaeology. Approaches, Applications, and Implications , 2013 .

[38]  Katherine Timms New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries, and Museums , 2009 .

[39]  Michael Magruder The Vitruvian World: a case study in creative hybridisation of virtual, physical and networked space , 2009 .

[40]  S. Ewen,et al.  The New Media Reader , 2001 .

[41]  James Gleick,et al.  Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything , 1999 .

[42]  N. Goodman,et al.  Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols , 1971 .

[43]  Heide Hagebölling Elements of a History of Interactive Dramaturgy , 2004 .

[44]  W. Dutton Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities , 1996 .

[45]  P. Brook Empty Space , 1941, Nature.

[46]  O. Grau,et al.  Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion , 2003 .

[47]  Miriam Cunningham,et al.  Collaboration and the knowledge economy : issues, applications, case studies , 2008 .

[48]  J. Butt Playing with History: The Historical Approach to Musical Performance , 2002 .

[49]  Paul Smith,et al.  Best Before...software artworks may be seen after this date; however their quality may be affected by improper storage. , 2011 .

[50]  Sylvie Mokhtari Rethinking Curating: Art After New Media , 2013 .

[51]  Ryoji Ikeda Digital Art , 2010 .

[52]  Joseph Grigely,et al.  Textualterity: Art, Theory, and Textual Criticism , 1995 .

[53]  Anne Morris,et al.  Links between Libraries and Museums: Investigating Museum-Library Collaboration in England and the USA , 2007 .

[54]  Steve Benford,et al.  From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences , 2009, CHI.

[55]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Ethnography and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[56]  Seamus Ross Digital Preservation, Archival Science and Methodological Foundations for Digital Libraries , 2012 .

[57]  Alexandra Yarrow,et al.  Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation , 2008 .

[58]  The Cybernetics of Performance and New Media Art , 2000, Leonardo.

[59]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. , 2012 .

[60]  Daisy Abbott Getting to know our Audience: AHDS Performing Arts Scoping Study , 2006 .

[61]  Margot Lovejoy,et al.  Context Providers: Conditions of Meaning in Media Arts , 2011 .

[62]  Vicky Reich,et al.  LOCKSS: A Permanent Web Publishing and Access System , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[63]  S. Covey Principle-Centered Leadership , 1989 .

[64]  Perla Innocenti Theories, methods and testbeds for curation and preservation of digital art , 2010 .

[65]  Simon Sheikh,et al.  Art and Its Institutions : Current Conflicts, Critique and Collaborations , 2006 .

[66]  Steve Benford,et al.  Designing the spectator experience , 2005, CHI.

[67]  Jennifer VanderBurgh New media in the white cube and beyond: Curatorial models for digital art , 2010 .