Cooperative Knowledge Discovery in Design Projects

As concurrent design has changed the landscape of design project management, knowledge management method is introduced in this field to enhance learning in an organization. However, new challenges arise for knowledge management in concurrent design projects: knowledge has changed from domain expert knowledge to organizational cooperative knowledge; simple knowledge conceptualization is not sufficient to represent interactions between concepts. Therefore, aims for these challenges, a new cooperative knowledge discovery method based on semantic networks by classification on concept interactions is proposed.

[1]  Guillaume Ducellier,et al.  Traceability and structuring of cooperative knowledge in design using PLM , 2013 .

[2]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  CML: The CommonKADS Conceptual Modelling Language , 1994, EKAW.

[3]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use , 1996 .

[4]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontologies: A silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce , 2002 .

[5]  Birger Hjørland.  The DDC, the universe of knowledge, and the post‐modern library , 1999 .

[6]  N. Matta,et al.  Definition of a practical learning system , 2005, 2005 6th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training.

[7]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Foundations for service ontologies: aligning OWL-S to dolce , 2004, WWW '04.

[8]  Thomas G. Dietterich.  Machine-Learning Research , 1997, AI Mag..

[9]  William A. Wulf,et al.  Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering teams , 1993 .

[10]  Myriam Lewkowicz,et al.  Project Memory in Design , 2001 .

[11]  Pedro M. Domingos.  A few useful things to know about machine learning , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[12]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[13]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[14]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management , 2003 .

[15]  Cao Feng,et al.  STATLOG: COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS ON LARGE REAL-WORLD PROBLEMS , 1995 .

[16]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[17]  Nada Matta,et al.  Project Situations Aggregation to Identify Cooperative Problem Solving Strategies , 2006, KES.

[18]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  Classification in context: Relativity, reality, and representation , 2004 .

[19]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use , 1997 .

[20]  Mark Klein,et al.  Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering teams , 1993, Computer.

[21]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW seriously , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[22]  Guillaume Ducellier,et al.  Memory Meetings - An Approach to Keep Track of Project Knowledge in Design , 2016, KDIR/KMIS.

[23]  Manuel Zacklad,et al.  Communities of action: a cognitive and social approach to the design of CSCW systems , 2003, GROUP '03.

[24]  Francis Miksa,et al.  The DDC, the Universe of Knowledge, and the Post-Modern Library , 1999 .

[25]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Information-Theoretic Rule Induction , 1988, ECAI.

[26]  Setrag Khoshafian,et al.  Introduction to Groupware, Workflow, and Workgroup Computing , 1995 .