How open are Canadian households to electric vehicles? A national latent class choice analysis with willingness-to-pay and metropolitan characterization

Abstract This paper reports on results developed from a 2015 national survey of Canadian consumers that sought to assess attitudes and preferences towards consumer electric vehicles. A latent class discrete choice model was developed based on stated preferences choices. Four classes emerged with each being oriented to one of the primary vehicle technologies considered. The dominant characteristics of the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)-oriented class are purchase price sensitivity, EV scepticism and an apparent resistance to change; for the Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV)-oriented class it is reluctance to plug-in and an unusual combination of high environmental concern and an acceptance to burn gasoline; for the suburban-oriented Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV)-oriented class it is measured optimism about plugging-in combined with an orientation to a replacement vehicle for the next purchase; and for the younger and most urban Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV)-oriented class it is the highest optimism about electric vehicles and a focus on positive aspects such as rapid acceleration and minimized maintenance costs. By orientation of household mindset, approximately 40% are ICE, 30% are PHEV, 20% are HEV and 10% are BEV. These results suggest considerable openness to electric vehicles. Willingness-to-pay for vehicle and charging attributes and incentives were calculated and are highly useful in interpreting the latent classes. The results feature interesting geographical variation which is captured at the level of Canadian metropolitan areas.

[1]  D. Sperling,et al.  Demand for Electric Vehicles in Hybrid Households: An Exploratory Analysis , 1994 .

[2]  John M. Rose,et al.  Accounting for Preference and Scale Heterogeneity in Establishing Whether it Matters Who is Interviewed to Reveal Household Automobile Purchase Preferences , 2011 .

[3]  K. Train,et al.  Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[4]  Andrew J. Yates,et al.  Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? , 2015 .

[5]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations , 2012 .

[6]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Size matters: How vehicle body type affects consumer preferences for electric vehicles , 2017 .

[7]  Mark J. Koetse,et al.  A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[8]  Junyi Shen.  Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data , 2009 .

[9]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Willingness-to-pay for infrastructure investments for alternative fuel vehicles , 2013 .

[10]  John K. Dagsvik,et al.  Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles , 2002 .

[11]  Lixian Qian,et al.  Heterogeneous consumer preferences for alternative fuel cars in China , 2011 .

[12]  P. Plötz,et al.  Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany , 2014 .

[13]  J. Scott.  Rational Choice Theory , 2007 .

[14]  Stefan Lindhard Mabit,et al.  Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high , 2011 .

[15]  John M. Rose,et al.  Environmental attitudes and emissions charging: An example of policy implications for vehicle choice , 2013 .

[16]  Kenneth Train,et al.  EM algorithms for nonparametric estimation of mixing distributions , 2008 .

[17]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness , 2016 .

[18]  Christian A. Klöckner,et al.  Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use , 2013 .

[19]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[20]  Johan Jansson,et al.  Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda , 2015 .

[21]  John D. Graham,et al.  Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers’ intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle , 2015 .

[22]  Cinzia Cirillo,et al.  Measuring Future Vehicle Preferences , 2012 .

[23]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[24]  Michiel C.J. Bliemer,et al.  Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs , 2009 .

[25]  Andreas R. Ziegler,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Stated Preferences for Alternative Energy Sources and Propulsion Technologies in Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2010 .

[26]  Kenneth Lebeau,et al.  The market potential for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles in Flanders: A choice-based conjoint analysis , 2012 .

[27]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China , 2015 .

[28]  Michael Alan Tamor,et al.  Electric vehicles in multi-vehicle households , 2015 .

[29]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers , 2015 .

[30]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Key threshold for electricity emissions , 2015 .

[31]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles , 2013 .

[32]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes , 2011 .

[33]  Kenneth S Kurani,et al.  Households’ Stories of Their Encounters With a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle , 2012 .

[34]  Takanori Ida,et al.  Consumers’ willingness to pay for alternative fuel vehicles: A comparative discrete choice analysis between the US and Japan , 2014 .

[35]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2012 .

[36]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[37]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Assessing the importance of car meanings and attitudes in consumer evaluations of electric vehicles , 2016 .

[38]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling Studies , 2013 .

[39]  Denis Bolduc,et al.  Hybrid Choice Modeling of New Technologies for Car Choice in Canada , 2008 .

[40]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention , 2012 .

[41]  Yves Dube,et al.  A comprehensive review of lithium-ion batteries used in hybrid and electric vehicles at cold temperatures , 2016 .

[42]  Christopher D. Higgins,et al.  Identifying and characterizing potential electric vehicle adopters in Canada: A two-stage modelling approach , 2016 .

[43]  Jillian Anable,et al.  Who will adopt electric vehicles?: A segmentation approach of UK consumers , 2011 .

[44]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .

[45]  G. Ewing,et al.  Car fuel-type choice under travel demand management and economic incentives , 1998 .

[46]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles , 2007 .

[47]  Shanyong Wang,et al.  Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model , 2016 .