Birds achieve high robustness in uneven terrain through active control of landing conditions

SUMMARY We understand little about how animals adjust locomotor behaviour to negotiate uneven terrain. The mechanical demands and constraints of such behaviours likely differ from uniform terrain locomotion. Here we investigated how common pheasants negotiate visible obstacles with heights from 10 to 50% of leg length. Our goal was to determine the neuro-mechanical strategies used to achieve robust stability, and address whether strategies vary with obstacle height. We found that control of landing conditions was crucial for minimising fluctuations in stance leg loading and work in uneven terrain. Variation in touchdown leg angle (θTD) was correlated with the orientation of ground force during stance, and the angle between the leg and body velocity vector at touchdown (βTD) was correlated with net limb work. Pheasants actively targeted obstacles to control body velocity and leg posture at touchdown to achieve nearly steady dynamics on the obstacle step. In the approach step to an obstacle, the birds produced net positive limb work to launch themselves upward. On the obstacle, body dynamics were similar to uniform terrain. Pheasants also increased swing leg retraction velocity during obstacle negotiation, which we suggest is an active strategy to minimise fluctuations in peak force and leg posture in uneven terrain. Thus, pheasants appear to achieve robustly stable locomotion through a combination of path planning using visual feedback and active adjustment of leg swing dynamics to control landing conditions. We suggest that strategies for robust stability are context specific, depending on the quality of sensory feedback available, especially visual input.

[1]  I. Engberg,et al.  An electromyographic analysis of muscular activity in the hindlimb of the cat during unrestrained locomotion. , 1969, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[4]  V. Dietz,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of human locomotion. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  T. McMahon,et al.  Groucho running. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  P. Green,et al.  HEAD-BOBBING DURING WALKING, RUNNING AND FLYING: RELATIVE MOTION PERCEPTION IN THE PIGEON , 1988 .

[7]  R. Blickhan The spring-mass model for running and hopping. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  A. Biewener Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics. , 1989, Science.

[9]  A. Patla,et al.  Visual control of step length during overground locomotion: task-specific modulation of the locomotor synergy , 1989 .

[10]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  J. T. Erichsen,et al.  Lower-field myopia in birds: An adaptation that keeps the ground in focus , 1990, Vision Research.

[12]  T. McMahon,et al.  The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed? , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  T. McGeer,et al.  Passive bipedal running , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  S. Gatesy,et al.  Bipedal locomotion: effects of speed, size and limb posture in birds and humans , 1991 .

[15]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Running springs: speed and animal size. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  T. Collett,et al.  Lower-field myopia and astigmatism in amphibians and chickens. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  D R Carrier,et al.  Variable Gearing during Locomotion in the Human Musculoskeletal System Author(s) , 2022 .

[18]  M. Gorassini,et al.  Corrective responses to loss of ground support during walking. I. Intact cats. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  K. Pearson,et al.  Corrective responses to loss of ground support during walking. II. Comparison of intact and chronic spinal cats. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Interaction of leg stiffness and surfaces stiffness during human hopping. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Review article Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion , 1997 .

[22]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Mechanism of leg stiffness adjustment for hopping on surfaces of different stiffnesses. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  R J Full,et al.  Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Johan L. van Leeuwen Neuromuscular control: introduction and overview , 1999 .

[26]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Kinematic analysis of obstacle clearance during locomotion. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[27]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Runners adjust leg stiffness for their first step on a new running surface. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  J. Duysens,et al.  Load-regulating mechanisms in gait and posture: comparative aspects. , 2000, Physiological reviews.

[29]  Daniel Koditschek,et al.  Quantifying Dynamic Stability and Maneuverability in Legged Locomotion1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[30]  R. Full,et al.  Dynamic stabilization of rapid hexapedal locomotion. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[31]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  A movement criterion for running. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Hartmut Geyer,et al.  Swing-leg retraction: a simple control model for stable running , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  Karl Kral,et al.  Behavioural–analytical studies of the role of head movements in depth perception in insects, birds and mammals , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[34]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Human hopping on damped surfaces: strategies for adjusting leg mechanics , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Chet T Moritz,et al.  Passive dynamics change leg mechanics for an unexpected surface during human hopping. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[36]  Ronald F. Zernicke,et al.  Gait-related motor patterns and hindlimb kinetics for the cat trot and gallop , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Philip Holmes,et al.  Dynamics and stability of insect locomotion: a hexapedal model for horizontal plane motions , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[38]  A. Patla,et al.  Adapting locomotion to different surface compliances: neuromuscular responses and changes in movement dynamics. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Spring-mass running: simple approximate solution and application to gait stability. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  N. Fowkes,et al.  Modification patterns in germinating barley--malting II. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  J. Pakan,et al.  Two optic flow pathways from the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali to the cerebellum in pigeons (Columba livia) , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[42]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  A. Biewener,et al.  Running over rough terrain: guinea fowl maintain dynamic stability despite a large unexpected change in substrate height , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[44]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Running and Walking with Compliant Legs , 2006 .

[45]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Juergen Rummel,et al.  Advanced Swing Leg Control for Stable Locomotion , 2007, AMS.

[47]  Justin Seipel,et al.  A simple model for clock-actuated legged locomotion , 2007 .

[48]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[49]  A. Biewener,et al.  Running stability is enhanced by a proximo-distal gradient in joint neuromechanical control , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[50]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Running on uneven ground: leg adjustment to vertical steps and self-stability , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[51]  R J Full,et al.  Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[52]  Alexandra S. Voloshina,et al.  The role of intrinsic muscle mechanics in the neuromuscular control of stable running in the guinea fowl , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  Koushil Sreenath,et al.  MABEL, a new robotic bipedal walker and runner , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[54]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Modeling posture-dependent leg actuation in sagittal plane locomotion , 2009, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[55]  Susanne W. Lipfert,et al.  Swing leg control in human running , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[56]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Running on uneven ground: leg adjustments to altered ground level. , 2010, Human movement science.

[57]  M. Daley,et al.  Two explanations for the compliant running paradox: reduced work of bouncing viscera and increased stability in uneven terrain , 2010, Biology Letters.

[58]  Multiple and Curvilinear Regression , 2010 .

[59]  R. M. Wilkie,et al.  Using vision to control locomotion: looking where you want to go , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Running on uneven ground: leg adjustments by muscle pre-activation control. , 2010, Human movement science.

[61]  A. Biewener,et al.  Leg muscles that mediate stability: mechanics and control of two distal extensor muscles during obstacle negotiation in the guinea fowl , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  Andre Seyfarth,et al.  Does a crouched leg posture enhance running stability and robustness? , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[63]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  Running over unknown rough terrain with a one-legged planar robot , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[64]  T. Higham,et al.  Slipping, sliding and stability: locomotor strategies for overcoming low-friction surfaces , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[65]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Human locomotion through a multiple obstacle environment: strategy changes as a result of visual field limitation , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[66]  Graham R. Martin,et al.  Understanding bird collisions with man-made objects: a sensory ecology approach , 2011 .