On the “selectivity” of the Golgi‐Cox method

The randomness of the impregnation of layer IV cortical neurons by the Golgi‐Cox method (Van der Loos, 1956) has been assessed directly in Barrel C‐1 of the mouse SmI. All Golgi‐Cox impregnated neurons and unimpregnated neurons which were revealed with Nissl counterstain were counted and measured in ten cerebral hemispheres cut tangential to the pia overlying the barrel field. The percentage of Golgi stained neurons varied considerably in different preparations from 0.73% to 2.26% with an average of 1.29%. The size distributions of both the Golgi impregnated and Nissl stained cells are similar but the difference of the means is statistically significant. However, if the means are eqated there is no statistical difference in the two populations. When the Golgi precipitate is removed and the cells re‐measured following Nissl staining there is a systematic reduction of the perikaryal cross‐sectional area which is compatible with the differences in the means observed for the two populations as a whole. Finally, the frequency with which Golgi impregnated neurons are found in the barrel sides and hollows parallels the frequency with which Nissl stained neurons are observed in these two locations. We conclude that this variant of the Golgi method impregnates barrel neurons randomly. The value of this information for quantitative studies of cerebral cortex is discussed as is the potential of the system for elucidating some of the mechanisms responsible for Golgi impregnation.

[1]  W. M. Cowan,et al.  A computer system for the measurement of cell and nuclear sizes* , 1973, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  F. Valverde,et al.  Rate and extent of recovery from dark rearing in the visual cortex of the mouse. , 1971, Brain research.

[3]  F. Volkmar,et al.  Pattern of dendritic branching in occipital cortex of rats reared in complex environments. , 1973, Experimental neurology.

[4]  D. F. Wann,et al.  Mouse SmI cortex: qualitative and quantitative classification of golgi-impregnated barrel neurons. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  E. Ramón-Moliner,et al.  The histology of the postcruciate gyrus in the cat . II. A statistical analysis of the dendritic distribution , 1961, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (S I) of mouse cerebral cortex , 1970 .

[7]  E. Ramon‐Moliner,et al.  Electron microscopy of previously identified cells and processes within the central nervous system , 1972, Journal of neurocytology.

[8]  S. Levay,et al.  Synaptic patterns in the visual cortex of the cat and monkey. Electron microscopy of Golgi Preparations , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  Ramón y Cajal,et al.  Histologie du système nerveux de l'homme & des vertébrés , 1909 .

[10]  D. Sholl.  The organization of the cerebral cortex , 1957 .

[11]  M. Marín‐padilla.  Structural abnormalities of the cerebral cortex in human chromosomal aberrations: a Golgi study. , 1972, Brain research.

[12]  J. D. Green,et al.  Graded impregnation of nervous tissue stained by the Golgi procedure. , 1974, Stain technology.

[13]  Professor Dr. John C. Eccles,et al.  The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine , 1967, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[14]  T. Powell.  Transneuronal Cell Degeneration in the Olfactory Bulb shown by the Golgi Method , 1967, Nature.

[15]  W. Stell.  Correlation of retinal cytoarchitecture and ultrastructure in Golgi preparations , 1965, The Anatomical record.

[16]  J Szentágothai,et al.  Quantitative histological analysis of the cerebellar cortex in the cat. II. Cell numbers and densities in the granular layer. , 1971, Brain research.

[17]  Theodor W. Blackstad,et al.  Electron Microscopy of Golgi Preparations for the Study of Neuronal Relations , 1970 .

[18]  H. Loos.  Une combinaison de deux vieilles méthodes histologiques pour le système nerveux central , 1956 .

[19]  D F Wann,et al.  An on-line digital-computer system for the semiautomatic analysis of Golgi-impregnated neurons. , 1973, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[20]  D E Hillman,et al.  The primate cerebellar cortex: a Golgi and electron microscopic study. , 1967, Progress in brain research.

[21]  G. J. Smit,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the cerebral cortex. I. Aselectivity of the Golgi-Cox staining technique. , 1969, Brain research.

[22]  T. Woolsey,et al.  Somatosensory Cortex: Structural Alterations following Early Injury to Sense Organs , 1973, Science.

[23]  E. Ramón-Moliner,et al.  The Golgi-Cox Technique , 1970 .

[24]  F. Massey,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Analysis , 1970 .

[25]  R W Guillery,et al.  Patterns of synaptic interconnections in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of cat and monkey: a brief review. , 1971, Vision research.

[26]  T. Powell,et al.  The structure of the caudate nucleus of the cat: light and electron microscopy. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[27]  T. Powell,et al.  The mitral and short axon cells of the olfactory bulb. , 1970, Journal of cell science.

[28]  A. Scheibel,et al.  The effect of visual deprivation on cortical neurons: a Golgi study. , 1967, Experimental neurology.

[29]  E G Jones,et al.  The neuronal organization of the inferior colliculus of the adult cat. I. The central nucleus , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.