Values and Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions of Chinese University Students

The purpose of this study is to analyse the effects of personal demographic factors on Chinese university students’ values and perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) issues, and to identify the link between personal values and perceptions of CSR. The quantitative data consisted of 980 Chinese university students, and were collected by using a structured self-completion questionnaire. This study found that: 1) the importance of values education should be stressed, because we found that altruistic values associate negatively with perception of CSR, in contrast, egoistic values associate positively; 2) a CSR education programme should be designed accordingly to fit different student characteristics and needs such as gender and major differences; 3) values should be used as criteria for education and recruitment purposes, e.g., we found that female students represent more ethical values than male students, and have a more negative perception of the CSR performance; 4) the importance of environment performance should be recognised by Chinese corporations and policy-makers, because we found that Chinese corporations perform better in economic and social responsibilities than environmental responsibility. It provides an insight of the value structures of Chinese university students and the forces that shape ethical perceptions. It offers a comprehensive study of Chinese companies’ CSR performance, and the results improve the awareness of scholars and managers in solving the current problems and developing their CSR performances further.

[1]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  U. Dhar,et al.  Profession and Dietary Habits as Determinants of Perceived and Expected Values , 2008 .

[3]  W. Frederick.  Anchoring Values In Nature: Toward A Theory of Business Values , 1992, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[4]  Durwood Ruegger,et al.  A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics , 1992 .

[5]  David S. Steingard,et al.  How Teaching Business Ethics Makes a Difference: Findings from an Ethical Learning Model , 2006 .

[6]  J. Crawford,et al.  An empirical investigation of the influence of modernisation on the moral judgements of managers in the People’s Republic of China , 2004 .

[7]  Keith Davis,et al.  Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? , 1960 .

[8]  Upinder Dhar,et al.  Perception of Values: A Study of Future Professionals , 2004 .

[9]  Saadiatul Ibrahim,et al.  Executive and management attitudes towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia , 2002 .

[10]  Shruti Gupta,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Programs as a Continuum: An Exploratory Study , 2007 .

[11]  C. Walton,et al.  Corporate social responsibilities , 1967 .

[12]  Jan-Åke Törnroos,et al.  Ethics and value creation in business research: comparing two approaches , 2006 .

[13]  N. Smith,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? , 2003 .

[14]  P. Stern,et al.  The Value Basis of Environmental Concern , 1994 .

[15]  S. Borkowski,et al.  The ethical attitudes of students as a function of age, sex and experience , 1992 .

[16]  Richard W. Hoyt,et al.  A cross cultural comparison of ethical perspectives and decision approaches of business students: United States of America versus New Zealand , 1996 .

[17]  Morrell Heald,et al.  Management's Responsibility to Society: The Growth of an Idea , 1957, Business History Review.

[18]  Laura L. Whitcomb,et al.  Business Ethical Values in China and the U.S. , 1998 .

[19]  A. Carroll.  The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[20]  D. I. Hawkins,et al.  Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education , 1972 .

[21]  Thomas M. Jones,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined , 1980 .

[22]  H. Bettignies,et al.  Values and Management Education in China , 2007 .

[23]  W. M. Greenfield.  In the name of corporate social responsibility , 2004 .

[24]  W. Frederick.  Moving to CSR , 1998 .

[25]  Zhenzhong Ma,et al.  A Comparison of Personal Values of Chinese Accounting Practitioners and Students , 2007 .

[26]  Jan W. van Deth,et al.  The Concept of Values , 1995 .

[27]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Personal value priorities of economists , 2004 .

[28]  W. H. Shaw,et al.  Moral Issues in Business , 1979 .

[29]  B. K. Burton,et al.  Some Determinants of Student Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation , 1999 .

[30]  Y. Wong,et al.  Neo‐confucianism: the bane of foreign firms in China , 1998 .

[31]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance , 1979 .

[32]  T. Feddersen,et al.  Saints and Markets: Activists and the Supply of Credence Goods , 2001 .

[33]  Dima Jamali,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context , 2007 .

[34]  M. Rokeach.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[35]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[36]  Timothy A. Manuel.  An Ethics Role-Playing Case: Stockholders versus Stakeholders , 2010 .

[37]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[38]  Lawrence B. Chonko,et al.  Ethics and marketing management: An empirical examination , 1985 .

[39]  P. Drucker,et al.  管理的实践=The practice of management , 1954 .

[40]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model , 1985 .

[41]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach , 1995 .

[42]  C. Orpen.  The attitudes of united states and South African managers to corporate social responsibility , 1987 .

[43]  Kenneth D. Butterfield,et al.  A Review of The Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003 , 2005 .

[44]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[45]  Marjaana Lindeman,et al.  Measuring Values With the Short Schwartz's Value Survey , 2005, Journal of personality assessment.

[46]  Brian Murphy,et al.  An evaluation of stakeholder relationship marketing in China , 2006 .

[47]  Mohamed M. Ahmed,et al.  Business Students' Perception of Ethics and Moral Judgment: A Cross-Cultural Study , 2003 .

[48]  William C. Frederick,et al.  From CSR1 to CSR2 , 1994 .

[49]  C. Barnard.  The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[50]  A. Crane,et al.  Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization , 2005 .

[51]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[52]  Tim Barnett,et al.  Ethical Ideology and the Ethical Judgments of Marketing Professionals , 1998 .

[53]  T. Jones.  INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[54]  Pieter C. Arlow.  Personal characteristics in college students' evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility , 1991 .

[55]  Robert S. Rubin,et al.  The Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: United States and European Union Multinational Corporations , 2007 .

[56]  Elizabeth J. Rozell,et al.  The Influence of Personality and Demographic Variables on Ethical Decisions Related to Insider Trading , 1993 .

[57]  Satish P. Deshpande,et al.  Managers' Perception of Proper Ethical Conduct: The Effect of Sex, Age, and Level of Education , 1997 .

[58]  S. Schwartz.  A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work , 1999 .

[59]  Susan C. Borkowski,et al.  Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-Analysis , 1998 .

[60]  Daryl M. Guffey,et al.  Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals , 1996 .

[61]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications , 2006 .

[62]  Philip Selznick.  Leadership in administration , 1957 .

[63]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Ethics in american companies: A managerial perspective , 1987 .

[64]  U.S. Consumer Sensitivity to Corporate Social Performance , 1997 .

[65]  M. Friedman,et al.  Capitalism and Freedom , 1963 .

[66]  Thomas A. Hemphill.  Corporate Citizenship: The Case for a New Corporate Governance Model , 2004 .

[67]  N. Feather,et al.  From values to actions: Recent applications of the expectancy-value model , 1988 .

[68]  Fritz Rieger,et al.  A Study of the Relationship Between Personal Values and Moral Reasoning of Undergraduate Business Students , 2008 .

[69]  John P. Angelidis,et al.  The Relationship between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are there Differences Between Business Managers and Students? , 2008 .

[70]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Value Hierarchies Across Cultures , 2001 .

[71]  M. Lovejoy,et al.  Values, Personality, and Social Structure , 1973 .

[72]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[73]  S. P. Sethi,et al.  Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework , 1975 .

[74]  G. W. England.  Personal Value Systems of American Managers , 1967 .

[75]  E. Hansen,et al.  Corporate responsibility performance in the forest industries: A comparative analysis of student perceptions in Finland and the USA , 2011 .

[76]  C. Hemingway,et al.  Managers' Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2004 .

[77]  H. L. Johnson.  Business in contemporary society : framework and issues , 1971 .

[78]  Alan K. M. Au,et al.  Are New Zealand Business Students More Unethical Than Non-Business Students? , 1997 .

[79]  Ying Fan,et al.  A classification of Chinese culture , 2000 .

[80]  C. MacDonald,et al.  Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line” , 2004, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[81]  Rafik Z. Elias.  An Examination of Business Students' Perception of Corporate Social Responsibilities Before and After Bankruptcies , 2004 .

[82]  Edwin M. Epstein.  The Corporate Social Policy Process: Beyond Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Social Responsiveness , 1987 .

[83]  Grace Meina Lee,et al.  Values and Attitudes Toward Social and Environmental Accountability: a Study of MBA Students , 2007 .

[84]  R. Ford,et al.  Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature , 1994 .

[85]  D. Melé,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory , 2004 .

[86]  Barry Z. Posner,et al.  The Values of Business and Federal Government Executives: More Different Than Alike , 1996 .

[87]  L. Donaldson.  The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management Theory , 1990 .

[88]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management , 2005 .

[89]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[90]  S. Hunt,et al.  The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Revision and Three Questions , 2006 .

[91]  Chen-Fong Wu.  A Study of the Adjustment of Ethical Recogntion and Ethical Decision-Making of Managers-to-be Across the Taiwan Strait Before and After Receiving a Business Ethics Education , 2003 .

[92]  Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld.  EXECUTIVE APOLOGIES FOR PRICE FIXING: ROLE BIASED PERCEPTIONS OF CAUSALITY1 , 1981 .

[93]  David P. Baron,et al.  Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy , 2001 .

[94]  T. Jones.  Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model , 1991 .

[95]  D. Wood.  Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[96]  Simon A. Austin,et al.  Applying a Universal Content and Structure of Values in Construction Management , 2009 .

[97]  Xiaohe Lu,et al.  A Chinese Perspective: Business Ethics in China Now and in the Future , 2009 .

[98]  P. Homer,et al.  A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. , 1988 .

[99]  Don E. Giacomino,et al.  An Examination of the Differences Between Personal Values and Value Types of Female and Male Accounting and Nonaccounting Majors , 1998 .

[100]  Wanxue Qi,et al.  The social and cultural background of contemporary moral education in China , 2004 .

[101]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Serving the world's poor, profitably. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[102]  Peggy Simcic Brønn,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: an overview , 2001 .

[103]  M. Siltaoja,et al.  Value Priorities as Combining Core Factors Between CSR and Reputation – A Qualitative Study , 2006 .

[104]  Oliver Sheldon,et al.  The Philosophy of Management , 1980 .

[105]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[106]  Kit-Chun Lam,et al.  Factors Affecting Ethical Attitudes in Mainland China and Hong Kong , 2008 .

[107]  A. Carroll.  Corporate Social Responsibility , 1999, The Routledge Companion to Corporate Social Responsibility.

[108]  Craig V. VanSandt.  The Relationship Between Ethical Work Climate and Moral Awareness , 2003 .

[109]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[110]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[111]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[112]  Miriam K. Ringo,et al.  Business and Society , 1964 .

[113]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[114]  Kyoko Fukukawa,et al.  Values and the Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility: The U.S. versus China , 2007 .

[115]  Stephen. Pavelin,et al.  Corporate social performance and geographical diversification , 2006 .

[116]  John Meehan,et al.  Corporate social responsibility: the 3C‐SR model , 2006 .

[117]  An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers in Singapore , 1996 .

[118]  Zhuang Xiaoman,et al.  Teacher training for moral education in China , 2004 .