Colony size affects collective decision-making in the ant Temnothorax albipennis

Abstract.Social insects are well-known for their ability to achieve robust collective behaviours even when individuals have limited information. It is often assumed that such behaviours rely on very large group sizes, but many insect colonies start out with only a few workers. Here we investigate the influence of colony size on collective decision-making in the house-hunting of the ant Temnothorax albipennis. In experiments where colony size was manipulated by splitting colonies, we show that worker number has an influence on the speed with which colonies discover new nest sites, but not on the time needed to make a decision (achieve a quorum threshold) or total emigration time. This occurred because split colonies adopted a lower quorum threshold, in fact they adopted the same threshold in proportion to their size as full-size colonies. This indicates that ants may be measuring relative quorum, i.e. population in the new nest relative to that of the old nest, rather than the absolute number. Experimentally reduced colonies also seemed to gain more from experience through repeated emigrations, as they could then reduce nest discovery times to those of larger colonies. In colonies of different sizes collected from the field, total emigration time was also not correlated with colony size. However, quorum threshold was not correlated with colony size, meaning that individuals in larger colonies adopted relatively lower quorum thresholds. Since this is a different result to that from size-manipulated colonies, it strongly suggests that the differences between natural small and large colonies were not caused by worker number alone. Individual ants may have adjusted their behaviour to their colony’s size, or other factors may correlate with colony size in the field. Our study thus shows the importance of experimentally manipulating colony size if the effect of worker number on the emergence of collective behaviour is to be studied.

[1]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  R. Jeanne,et al.  Effects of colony size and stage of development on defense response by the swarm-founding wasp Polybia occidentalis , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Comparing foraging behaviour of small and large honey‐bee colonies by decoding waggle dances made by foragers , 2004 .

[4]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of ant foraging trail networks , 2003 .

[5]  J. Herbers,et al.  Reliability theory and foraging by ants , 1981 .

[6]  Individual foraging effort as a function of colony population in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy , 1989 .

[8]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Task partitioning in insect societies , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[10]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  How does colony growth influence communication in ants? , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[11]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[12]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation , 1996, Evolutionary Ecology.

[13]  Istvan Karsai,et al.  Organization and Regulation of Nest Construction Behavior in Metapolybia Wasps , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[14]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Ants estimate area using Buffon's needle , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  S. Pratt Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[18]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Task Partitioning in Insect Societies. I. Effect of Colony Size on Queueing Delay and Colony Ergonomic Efficiency , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Melissa L. Thomas,et al.  Colony size affects division of labour in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[20]  D. McShea,et al.  Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  F R Adler,et al.  Information Collection and Spread by Networks of Patrolling Ants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Robert L Jeanne,et al.  Scaling in Nests of a Social Wasp: A Property of the Social Group , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[23]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Not everything that counts can be counted: ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  J. Herbers,et al.  Foraging behaviour and colony structure in ants , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Field survey of a monogynous leptothoracine ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) evidence of seasonal polydomy ? , 1997, Insectes Sociaux.

[26]  J. F. Burkhardt Individual Flexibility and Tempo in the Ant, Pheidole dentata, the Influence of Group Size , 1998, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[27]  A. Szczuka,et al.  The effect of past and present group size on responses to prey in the ant Formica polyctena Först. , 1997, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[28]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Foraging Strategy, Worker Mortality, and the Growth of the Colony in Social Insects , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[29]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh's ants , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  N. Franks,et al.  Improvement in collective performance with experience in ants , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Decision making by small and large house-hunting ant colonies: one size fits all , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  I. Karsai,et al.  Productivity, individual-level and colony-level flexibility, and organization of work as consequences of colony size. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.