Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging

Users have adopted a wide range of digital technologies into their communication repertoire. It remains unclear why they adopt multiple forms of communication instead of substituting one medium for another. It also raises the question: What type of need does each of these media fulfill? In the present article, the authors conduct comparative work that examines the gratifications obtained from Facebook with those from instant messaging. This comparison between media allows one to draw conclusions about how different social media fulfill user needs. Data were collected from undergraduate students through a multimethod study based on 77 surveys and 21 interviews. A factor analysis of gratifications obtained from Facebook revealed six key dimensions: pastime, affection, fashion, share problems, sociability, and social information. Comparative analysis showed that Facebook is about having fun and knowing about the social activities occurring in one’s social network, whereas instant messaging is geared more toward relationship maintenance and development. The authors discuss differences in the two technologies and outline a framework based on uses and gratifications theory as to why young people integrate numerous media into their communication habits.

[1]  Edwin B. Parker,et al.  Television in the lives of our children , 1962 .

[2]  S. Levine.  Rev. Marshall McLuhan, "Understanding Media: The Extension of Man" , 1964 .

[3]  H. Innis.  The Bias of Communication , 1964 .

[4]  後藤 和彦.  Marshall McLuhan:Understanding Media-The extensions of man, New York:McGraw-Hill, 1964 , 1967 .

[5]  E. Katz,et al.  On the use of the mass media for important things. , 1973 .

[6]  E. Katz,et al.  The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III. , 1975 .

[7]  Susan Tyler Eastman,et al.  Uses of television viewing and consumer life styles: A multivariate analysis , 1979 .

[8]  A. Rubin.  TELEVISION USE BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS , 1979 .

[9]  Philip Palmgreen,et al.  Relations Between Gratifications Sought and Obtained , 1980 .

[10]  Denis McQuail,et al.  Communication models for the study of mass communications , 1981 .

[11]  A. Rubin.  Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations , 1983 .

[12]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Using television to alleviate boredom and stress: Selective exposure as a function of induced excitational states , 1984 .

[13]  Marshall McLuhan,et al.  The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century , 1989 .

[14]  Alan M. Rubin,et al.  Talk Radio as Interpersonal Communication , 1989 .

[15]  Jean A. Dobos.  Gratification Models of Satisfaction and Choice of Communication Channels in Organizations , 1992 .

[16]  John Dimmick,et al.  The Gratifications of the Household Telephone , 1994 .

[17]  G. O'keefe,et al.  More Than Just Talk: Uses, Gratifications, and the Telephone , 1995 .

[18]  Thomas W. Valente.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[19]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites , 1998 .

[20]  John Eighmey,et al.  Adding Value in the Information Age: Uses and Gratifications of Sites on the World Wide Web , 1998 .

[21]  R. McIlwraith,et al.  “I'm addicted to television”: The personality, imagination, and TV watching patterns of self‐identified TV addicts , 1998 .

[22]  Louis Leung,et al.  The gratifications of pager use: sociability, information-seeking, entertainment, utility, and fashion and status , 1998, Telematics Informatics.

[23]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[24]  Louis Leung,et al.  More Than Just Talk on the Move: Uses and Gratifications of the Cellular Phone , 2000 .

[25]  Louis Leung,et al.  College Student Motives for Chatting on ICQ , 2001, New Media Soc..

[26]  Carolyn A. Lin.  Audience Attributes, Media Supplementation, and Likely Online Service Adoption , 2001 .

[27]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[28]  David C. Yen,et al.  Usefulness of instant messaging among young users: Social vs. work perspective , 2003 .

[29]  Thomas F. Stafford,et al.  Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[30]  Nancy K. Baym,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Telephone and Face-to-Face , 2004, New Media Soc..

[31]  Yifeng Hu,et al.  Friendships through IM: Examining the Relationship between Instant Messaging and Intimacy , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Lauren Squires,et al.  College students in multimedia relationships: Choosing, using, and fusing communication technologies , 2004 .

[33]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[34]  Wan-Ying Lin,et al.  The influence of social environment on internet connectedness of adolescents in Seoul, Singapore and Taipei , 2005, New Media Soc..

[35]  Andrew J. Flanagin.  IM Online: Instant Messaging Use Among College Students , 2005 .

[36]  P. Liamputtong.  Qualitative Research Methods , 2005 .

[37]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites , 2006, First Monday.

[38]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[39]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[40]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Facebook’s ’Privacy Trainwreck’: Exposure, Invasion, and Drama , 2006 .

[41]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Teens, privacy and online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace , 2007 .

[42]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[43]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Social networking websites and teens: an overview , 2007 .

[44]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Motivations for social networking at work , 2008, CSCW.

[45]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Instant Messaging on Campus: Use and Integration in University Students' Everyday Communication , 2008, Inf. Soc..

[46]  Zeynep Tufekci.  Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites , 2008 .

[47]  R. LaRose,et al.  A Social-Cognitive Approach to Uses and Gratifications , 2008 .

[48]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[49]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[50]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community , 2008 .

[51]  Amanda Lenhart,et al.  Adults and social network websites , 2009 .

[52]  Romeo Asiminei.  COMMUNICATION MODELS FOR THE STUDY OF MASS COMMUNICATION , 2011 .