Variability Specific to a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Product Deterioration

Environmental issues and increasing global demand have led to calls for sustainable production and consumption. Products deemed insufficiently environmentally friendly are beginning to be removed from the market, and manufacturers must achieve social responsibility and economic benefits. However, in a conventional linear supply chain, an increase in sales volume directly leads to an increase in waste and resource consumption, resulting in a trade-off between the environment and the economy. Closed-loop supply chains resolve trade-offs, achieve corporate social responsibility, and enhance competitiveness. Closed-loop supply chains must recover used products with a high degree of uncertainty. Uncertainty in the quantity, quality, and timing of used products can cause serious problems such as the bullwhip effect in the dynamic behavior of the supply chain. This study aims to analyze the dynamic impact of used product uncertainty on a closed-loop supply chain and propose ways to deal with it. Products deteriorate with their use and eventually become worthless for recovery and remanufacturing. This study confirms that, even when there is no demand variability and lead time, the uncertainty of used products, especially qualitative uncertainty, causes large variability in the closed-loop supply chain. The results of the numerical example using the model proposed in this study show that the policy of limiting the quantity of remanufacturing can mitigate the variability. Furthermore, the appropriate limits vary depending on the characteristics of the product, such as its lifetime. This suggests the need to control the amount of remanufacturing for the sustainability of the closed-loop supply chain rather than remanufacturing as much as possible, to reduce environmental impact.

[1]  Tetsuo Yamada,et al.  Solar Energy Demand-to-Supply Management by the On-Demand Cumulative-Control Method: Case of a Childcare Facility in Tokyo , 2022, Energies.

[2]  Surendra M. Gupta,et al.  Designing a Sustainable Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Uncertainty and Various Capacity Levels , 2021, Logistics.

[3]  G. Hammes,et al.  How the combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals , 2021 .

[4]  J. Framiñan,et al.  Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in closed-loop supply chains: The interplay of information transparencies, return rates, and lead times , 2020 .

[5]  Masato Inoue,et al.  Remanufacturing Option Selection with Disassembly for Recovery Rate and Profit , 2020, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[6]  Masato Inoue,et al.  Collaboration Strategy for a Decentralized Supply Chain Using Linear Physical Programming , 2020, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[7]  Masato Inoue,et al.  Decision support model of environmentally friendly and economical material strategy for life cycle cost and recyclable weight , 2020 .

[8]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Uncertainty factors, methods, and solutions of closed-loop supply chain — A review for current situation and future prospects , 2020 .

[9]  Ehsan Shekarian,et al.  A review of factors affecting closed-loop supply chain models , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[10]  Masato Inoue,et al.  Designing Reverse Supply Chain Network with Costs and Recycling Rate by Using Linear Physical Programming , 2019, International Journal of Smart Computing and Artificial Intelligence.

[11]  A. Ishigaki,et al.  Data Analysis of Shipment for Textiles and Apparel from Logistics Warehouse to Store Considering Disposal Risk , 2019, Sustainability.

[12]  Aris A. Syntetos,et al.  The boomerang returns? Accounting for the impact of uncertainties on the dynamics of remanufacturing systems , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[13]  Antonio Carlos Braz,et al.  The bullwhip effect in closed-loop supply chains: A systematic literature review , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Surendra M. Gupta,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain in Consideration of Extra Demand , 2018, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[15]  Yongfeng Zhang,et al.  Bullwhip effect mitigation of green supply chain optimization in electronics industry , 2018 .

[16]  Masato Inoue,et al.  Global supply chain network design and Asian analysis with material-based carbon emissions and tax , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[17]  Janet Godsell,et al.  Supply Chain Configurations in the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review , 2017 .

[18]  Surendra M. Gupta,et al.  Design of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Stochastic Product Returns , 2017, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[19]  Keith R. Skene,et al.  The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context , 2015, Journal of Business Ethics.

[20]  Xun Wang,et al.  The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Conny Bakker,et al.  Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market , 2016 .

[22]  Masato Inoue,et al.  Disassembly system modeling and design with parts selection for cost, recycling and CO2 saving rates using multi criteria optimization , 2016 .

[23]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chains , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Jen-Ming Chen,et al.  The co-opetitive strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing , 2012 .

[25]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..