Compounding as Abstract Operation in Semantic Space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Angeliki Lazaridou,et al. Multimodal Word Meaning Induction From Minimal Exposure to Natural Text. , 2017, Cognitive science.
[2] M. Brysbaert,et al. Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting : A review and empirical validation , 2017 .
[3] Marco Marelli,et al. Spicy Adjectives and Nominal Donkeys: Capturing Semantic Deviance Using Compositionality in Distributional Spaces , 2017, Cogn. Sci..
[4] Marco Marelli,et al. Understanding Karma Police: The Perceived Plausibility of Noun Compounds as Predicted by Distributional Models of Semantic Representation , 2016, PloS one.
[5] Geoff Hollis,et al. The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[6] Victor Kuperman,et al. Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[7] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in english compound and pseudocompound words. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[8] D. Bates,et al. Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .
[9] Massimo Poesio,et al. Reading visually embodied meaning from the brain: Visually grounded computational models decode visual-object mental imagery induced by written text , 2015, NeuroImage.
[10] H. Baayen,et al. Vietnamese compounds show an anti-frequency effect in visual lexical decision , 2015 .
[11] M. Marelli,et al. Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. , 2015, Psychological review.
[12] Sandro Pezzelle. Generating meaning representations for compound words: a new perspective from compositional distributional semantics , 2015 .
[13] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Subcategorisation, not uncertainty, drives the modification effect , 2014 .
[14] M. Marelli,et al. Picking buttercups and eating butter cups: Spelling alternations, semantic relatedness, and their consequences for compound processing , 2014, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[15] Georgiana Dinu,et al. Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors , 2014, ACL.
[16] Petra E. Pajtas,et al. Task influences on the production and comprehension of compound words , 2014, Memory & cognition.
[17] Gary Libben,et al. The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective , 2014, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[18] Marco Baroni,et al. Frege in Space: A Program of Compositional Distributional Semantics , 2014 .
[19] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Relational diversity affects ease of processing even for opaque English compounds , 2014 .
[20] Elia Bruni,et al. Multimodal Distributional Semantics , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[21] Georgiana Dinu,et al. DISSECT - DIStributional SEmantics Composition Toolkit , 2013, ACL.
[22] Victor Kuperman,et al. Accentuate the Positive: Semantic Access in English Compounds , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[23] Jeffrey Dean,et al. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.
[24] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Conceptual Composition: The Role of Relational Competition in the Comprehension of Modifier-Noun Phrases and Noun–Noun Compounds , 2013 .
[25] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Processing of English compounds is sensitive to the constituents’ semantic transparency , 2013 .
[26] Trevor Bekolay,et al. A Large-Scale Model of the Functioning Brain , 2012, Science.
[27] Marco Marelli,et al. Frequency Effects in the Processing of Italian Nominal Compounds: Modulation of Headedness and Semantic Transparency , 2012 .
[28] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds , 2011 .
[29] R. Lieber. A Lexical Semantic Approach to Compounding , 2011 .
[30] Antonietta Bisetto,et al. The Classification of Compounds , 2011 .
[31] Max M. Louwerse,et al. Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[32] Dermot Lynott,et al. Embodied Conceptual Combination , 2010, Front. Psychology.
[33] Mirella Lapata,et al. Composition in Distributional Models of Semantics , 2010, Cogn. Sci..
[34] E. Guevara. A Regression Model of Adjective-Noun Compositionality in Distributional Semantics , 2010 .
[35] Patrick Pantel,et al. From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[36] L. Barsalou,et al. Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. , 2009, Acta psychologica.
[37] Gabriella Vigliocco,et al. Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.
[38] Fintan Costello,et al. Using Lexical Patterns in the Google Web 1T Corpus to Deduce Semantic Relations Between Nouns , 2009, SEW@NAACL-HLT.
[39] R. Baayen,et al. Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] I. Laka,et al. Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words , 2009 .
[41] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? , 2009 .
[42] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Does s now man prime plastic snow ?: The effect of constituent position in using relational information during the interpretation of modifier-noun phrases , 2009 .
[43] Robert Fiorentino,et al. Masked morphological priming of compound constituents , 2009 .
[44] M. Marelli,et al. Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds: A constituent priming study in Italian , 2009 .
[45] R. Harald Baayen,et al. Morphological dynamics in compound processing , 2008 .
[46] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[47] Tom Michael Mitchell,et al. Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns , 2008, Science.
[48] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. , 2008, British journal of psychology.
[49] R. Harald Baayen,et al. Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .
[50] M. Carreiras,et al. The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[51] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Conceptual Combination: Implications for the mental lexicon , 2007 .
[52] Mark Steyvers,et al. Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.
[53] W. Kintsch,et al. High-Dimensional Semantic Space Accounts of Priming. , 2006 .
[54] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Relation availability was not confounded with familiarity or plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[55] Tony Veale,et al. Using WordNet to Automatically Deduce Relations between Words in Noun-Noun Compounds , 2006, ACL.
[56] Lara L. Jones,et al. Priming via relational similarity: A COPPER HORSE is faster when seen through a GLASS EYE , 2006 .
[57] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun–noun compounds , 2004, Brain and Language.
[58] Michael J Cortese,et al. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[59] Mark T. Keane,et al. Conceptual Combination with PUNC , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.
[60] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.
[61] Gary Libben,et al. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness , 2003, Brain and Language.
[62] Marcus Taft,et al. Morphological Representation as a Correlation Between form and Meaning , 2003 .
[63] Barbara Rosario,et al. The Descent of Hierarchy, and Selection in Relational Semantics , 2002, ACL.
[64] Robert Schreuder,et al. The Processing and Representation of Dutch and English Compounds: Peripheral Morphological and Central Orthographic Effects , 2002, Brain and Language.
[65] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[66] Michael Ramscar,et al. Testing the Distributioanl Hypothesis: The influence of Context on Judgements of Semantic Similarity , 2001 .
[67] A. Glenberg,et al. Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning , 2000 .
[68] Mark T. Keane,et al. Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination. , 2000 .
[69] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Relation-Based Combinations Versus Property-Based Combinations: A Test of the CARIN Theory and the Dual-Process Theory of Conceptual Combination , 2000 .
[70] A. Ralli,et al. The Role of Morphological Structure in the Processing of Compounds: The Interface between Linguistics and Psycholinguistics , 1999, Brain and Language.
[71] Gary Libben,et al. Processing Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study , 1999, Brain and Language.
[72] A. Pollatsek,et al. Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[73] Bradley C. Love,et al. Relations versus Properties in Conceptual Combination , 1998 .
[74] Gary Libben,et al. Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing, and Impairment , 1998, Brain and Language.
[75] T. Landauer,et al. A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .
[76] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .
[77] Curt Burgess,et al. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .
[78] J. Fodor,et al. The red herring and the pet fish: why concepts still can't be prototypes , 1996, Cognition.
[79] Dominiek Sandra,et al. The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective , 1994 .
[80] Pienie Zwitserlood,et al. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds , 1994 .
[81] M. Ryder. Ordered Chaos: The Interpretation of English Noun-Noun Compounds , 1994 .
[82] Gregory L. Murphy,et al. Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination , 1990 .
[83] Edward E. Smith,et al. Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. , 1988 .
[84] Gregory L. Murphy,et al. Comprehending Complex Concepts , 1988, Cogn. Sci..
[85] D. Medin,et al. Context and structure in conceptual combination , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.
[86] J. Hampton. Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions , 1987, Memory & cognition.
[87] Daniel N. Osherson,et al. Conceptual Combination with Prototype Concepts , 1984, Cogn. Sci..
[88] Benjamin Cohen,et al. Models of Concepts , 1984, Cogn. Sci..
[89] Edward E. Smith,et al. On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts , 1981, Cognition.
[90] Judith N. Levi,et al. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals , 1978 .
[91] Pamela A. Downing. On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns. , 1977 .
[92] K. Forster,et al. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .
[93] Zellig S. Harris,et al. Distributional Structure , 1954 .