Compounding as Abstract Operation in Semantic Space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model

[1]  Angeliki Lazaridou,et al.  Multimodal Word Meaning Induction From Minimal Exposure to Natural Text. , 2017, Cognitive science.

[2]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting : A review and empirical validation , 2017 .

[3]  Marco Marelli,et al.  Spicy Adjectives and Nominal Donkeys: Capturing Semantic Deviance Using Compositionality in Distributional Spaces , 2017, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Marco Marelli,et al.  Understanding Karma Police: The Perceived Plausibility of Noun Compounds as Predicted by Distributional Models of Semantic Representation , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  Geoff Hollis,et al.  The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[6]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in english compound and pseudocompound words. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[9]  Massimo Poesio,et al.  Reading visually embodied meaning from the brain: Visually grounded computational models decode visual-object mental imagery induced by written text , 2015, NeuroImage.

[10]  H. Baayen,et al.  Vietnamese compounds show an anti-frequency effect in visual lexical decision , 2015 .

[11]  M. Marelli,et al.  Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. , 2015, Psychological review.

[12]  Sandro Pezzelle Generating meaning representations for compound words: a new perspective from compositional distributional semantics , 2015 .

[13]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Subcategorisation, not uncertainty, drives the modification effect , 2014 .

[14]  M. Marelli,et al.  Picking buttercups and eating butter cups: Spelling alternations, semantic relatedness, and their consequences for compound processing , 2014, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[15]  Georgiana Dinu,et al.  Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors , 2014, ACL.

[16]  Petra E. Pajtas,et al.  Task influences on the production and comprehension of compound words , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Gary Libben,et al.  The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective , 2014, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  Marco Baroni,et al.  Frege in Space: A Program of Compositional Distributional Semantics , 2014 .

[19]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Relational diversity affects ease of processing even for opaque English compounds , 2014 .

[20]  Elia Bruni,et al.  Multimodal Distributional Semantics , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[21]  Georgiana Dinu,et al.  DISSECT - DIStributional SEmantics Composition Toolkit , 2013, ACL.

[22]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  Accentuate the Positive: Semantic Access in English Compounds , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[23]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.

[24]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Conceptual Composition: The Role of Relational Competition in the Comprehension of Modifier-Noun Phrases and Noun–Noun Compounds , 2013 .

[25]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Processing of English compounds is sensitive to the constituents’ semantic transparency , 2013 .

[26]  Trevor Bekolay,et al.  A Large-Scale Model of the Functioning Brain , 2012, Science.

[27]  Marco Marelli,et al.  Frequency Effects in the Processing of Italian Nominal Compounds: Modulation of Headedness and Semantic Transparency , 2012 .

[28]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds , 2011 .

[29]  R. Lieber A Lexical Semantic Approach to Compounding , 2011 .

[30]  Antonietta Bisetto,et al.  The Classification of Compounds , 2011 .

[31]  Max M. Louwerse,et al.  Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Dermot Lynott,et al.  Embodied Conceptual Combination , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[33]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Composition in Distributional Models of Semantics , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  E. Guevara A Regression Model of Adjective-Noun Compositionality in Distributional Semantics , 2010 .

[35]  Patrick Pantel,et al.  From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[36]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[37]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.

[38]  Fintan Costello,et al.  Using Lexical Patterns in the Google Web 1T Corpus to Deduce Semantic Relations Between Nouns , 2009, SEW@NAACL-HLT.

[39]  R. Baayen,et al.  Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  I. Laka,et al.  Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words , 2009 .

[41]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? , 2009 .

[42]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Does s now man prime plastic snow ?: The effect of constituent position in using relational information during the interpretation of modifier-noun phrases , 2009 .

[43]  Robert Fiorentino,et al.  Masked morphological priming of compound constituents , 2009 .

[44]  M. Marelli,et al.  Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds: A constituent priming study in Italian , 2009 .

[45]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Morphological dynamics in compound processing , 2008 .

[46]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[47]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns , 2008, Science.

[48]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[49]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[50]  M. Carreiras,et al.  The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Conceptual Combination: Implications for the mental lexicon , 2007 .

[52]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.

[53]  W. Kintsch,et al.  High-Dimensional Semantic Space Accounts of Priming. , 2006 .

[54]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Relation availability was not confounded with familiarity or plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  Tony Veale,et al.  Using WordNet to Automatically Deduce Relations between Words in Noun-Noun Compounds , 2006, ACL.

[56]  Lara L. Jones,et al.  Priming via relational similarity: A COPPER HORSE is faster when seen through a GLASS EYE , 2006 .

[57]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun–noun compounds , 2004, Brain and Language.

[58]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Conceptual Combination with PUNC , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[60]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[61]  Gary Libben,et al.  Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness , 2003, Brain and Language.

[62]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Morphological Representation as a Correlation Between form and Meaning , 2003 .

[63]  Barbara Rosario,et al.  The Descent of Hierarchy, and Selection in Relational Semantics , 2002, ACL.

[64]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  The Processing and Representation of Dutch and English Compounds: Peripheral Morphological and Central Orthographic Effects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[65]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Testing the Distributioanl Hypothesis: The influence of Context on Judgements of Semantic Similarity , 2001 .

[67]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning , 2000 .

[68]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination. , 2000 .

[69]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Relation-Based Combinations Versus Property-Based Combinations: A Test of the CARIN Theory and the Dual-Process Theory of Conceptual Combination , 2000 .

[70]  A. Ralli,et al.  The Role of Morphological Structure in the Processing of Compounds: The Interface between Linguistics and Psycholinguistics , 1999, Brain and Language.

[71]  Gary Libben,et al.  Processing Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study , 1999, Brain and Language.

[72]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Relations versus Properties in Conceptual Combination , 1998 .

[74]  Gary Libben,et al.  Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing, and Impairment , 1998, Brain and Language.

[75]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[76]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .

[77]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[78]  J. Fodor,et al.  The red herring and the pet fish: why concepts still can't be prototypes , 1996, Cognition.

[79]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective , 1994 .

[80]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds , 1994 .

[81]  M. Ryder Ordered Chaos: The Interpretation of English Noun-Noun Compounds , 1994 .

[82]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination , 1990 .

[83]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. , 1988 .

[84]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Comprehending Complex Concepts , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[85]  D. Medin,et al.  Context and structure in conceptual combination , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[86]  J. Hampton Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[87]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Conceptual Combination with Prototype Concepts , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[88]  Benjamin Cohen,et al.  Models of Concepts , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[89]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts , 1981, Cognition.

[90]  Judith N. Levi,et al.  The syntax and semantics of complex nominals , 1978 .

[91]  Pamela A. Downing On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns. , 1977 .

[92]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[93]  Zellig S. Harris,et al.  Distributional Structure , 1954 .