The African Economic Partnership Agreements with the EU: Reflections inspired by the case of the East African Community ☆

This paper appraises the likely effects of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between the East African Community (EAC) and the European Union (EU). Customs data are used to estimate the revenue and welfare effects of an EPA with and without an exception list. Revenue and welfare effects are rather small. The paper then discusses the benefits that would have occurred had the EAC-EU protocol on rules of origin been simplified and made more compatible with the multilateral trading system. An inclusion of services would have also helped achieve the objective of increased competitiveness in goods trade, while the time table for tariff reduction in the EAC should have been shorter. The paper suggests in closing that the present appraisal is applicable also to the other African EPAs.

[1]  J. Melo,et al.  Preferential Market Access Design: Evidence and Lessons from African Apparel Exports to the United States and the European Union , 2014 .

[2]  Y. R. Damuri.  How Preferential are Preferential Trade Agreements?: Analysis of Product Exclusions in PTAs , 2009 .

[3]  P. Brenton,et al.  Africa's trade in services and the opportunities and risks of economic partnership agreements , 2010 .

[4]  M. Bacchetta,et al.  The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence to Coherence , 2011 .

[5]  Edward J. Balistreri,et al.  Services Liberalization in Preferential Trade Arrangements: The Case of Kenya , 2011 .

[6]  Alexander Keck,et al.  New Evidence on Preference Utilization , 2012 .

[7]  J. Melo,et al.  Revenue and Welfare Implications for Rwanda finalizing an Economic Partnership Agreement with the EU , 2014 .

[8]  D. Laborde,et al.  An Impact Study of the Economic Partnership Agreements in the Six ACP Regions , 2011 .

[9]  O. Cadot,et al.  Rules of Origin for Preferential Trading Arrangements: Implications for Afta of EU and Us Regimes , 2006 .

[10]  O. Cadot,et al.  Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin , 2007 .

[11]  Jaime de Melo,et al.  Regional Integration in Africa: Challenges and Prospects , 2014 .

[12]  Jeremy T. Harris,et al.  Multilateralising Preferential Rules of Origin around the World , 2009 .

[13]  O. Cadot,et al.  North-South Standards Harmonization and International Trade , 2012 .

[14]  Ben Shepherd,et al.  Measuring the cost of international trade in services , 2013, World Trade Review.

[15]  A. Khandelwal,et al.  Trade Liberalization and New Imported Inputs , 2009 .

[16]  P. Brenton,et al.  Assessing the Adjustment Implications of Trade Policy Changes Using Trist (Tariff Reform Impact Simulation Tool) , 2009 .

[17]  Alberto Portugal-Perez,et al.  Rules of Origin, Preferences and Diversification in Apparel: African Exports to the US and to the EU , 2008 .

[18]  David G. Tarr,et al.  Modeling Services Liberalization: The Case of Tanzania , 2008 .