Stochastic optimal reactive power dispatch method based on point estimation considering load margin

Conventional optimal reactive power dispatch approaches operate mostly in deterministic form where the power injections are fixed. In practice, however, power injections, especially from intermittent renewable sources, and demand are of uncertainties. To address this problem, in this paper, we develop a load margin constrained stochastic optimal reactive power dispatch (LMC-SORPD) method. We first formulated the considered problem into a chance-constrained programming, which is then solved through genetic algorithm and stochastic power flow based on point estimation. Simulation results on several cases demonstrate that the proposed method is able to prevent the risk of under and over-voltage and increase load margin at a cost of a small but acceptable increase of active power loss. Specified chance-constrained handling techniques are adopted to improve the computational speed. Numerical examples validate the effectiveness of those techniques.

[1]  C. Cañizares,et al.  Reactive Power and Voltage Control in Distribution Systems With Limited Switching Operations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Bhujanga B. Chakrabarti,et al.  Reactive power planning incorporating voltage stability , 2002 .

[3]  S.T. Lee,et al.  Probabilistic load flow computation using the method of combined cumulants and Gram-Charlier expansion , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  J. Aguado,et al.  Cumulant-based stochastic nonlinear programming for variance constrained voltage stability analysis of power systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Global Convergence Properties of Conjugate Gradient Methods for Optimization , 1992, SIAM J. Optim..

[6]  Barbara Borkowska,et al.  Probabilistic Load Flow , 1974 .

[7]  Kenji Iba Reactive power optimization by genetic algorithm , 1993 .

[8]  J.H. Zhang,et al.  A Chance Constrained Transmission Network Expansion Planning Method With Consideration of Load and Wind Farm Uncertainties , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  K. C. Mamandur,et al.  Optimal Control of Reactive Power flow for Improvements in Voltage Profiles and for Real Power Loss Minimization , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[10]  F. Alvarado,et al.  Computation of closest bifurcations in power systems , 1994 .

[11]  B. Stott,et al.  Further developments in LP-based optimal power flow , 1990 .

[12]  Qianfan Wang,et al.  A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic program for unit commitment with uncertain wind power output , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[13]  Magnus Perninge,et al.  A Stochastic Optimal Power Flow Problem With Stability Constraints—Part I: Approximating the Stability Boundary , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Zechun Hu,et al.  Stochastic optimal reactive power dispatch: Formulation and solution method , 2010 .

[15]  Y. Kataoka,et al.  Voltage stability limit of electric power systems with Generator reactive power constraints considered , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Carlos A. Castro,et al.  Continuation fast decoupled power flow with secant predictor , 2003 .

[17]  M. Perninge,et al.  A Stochastic Optimal Power Flow Problem With Stability Constraints—Part II: The Optimization Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  J. G. Kassakian,et al.  Forward Pass: Policy Challenges and Technical Opportunities on the U.S. Electric Grid , 2012, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[19]  J. Contreras,et al.  Optimal reactive power dispatch using stochastic chance-constrained programming , 2012, 2012 Sixth IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution: Latin America Conference and Exposition (T&D-LA).