Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotations Remaps Movement Vectors, Not Final Positions

When exposed to novel visuomotor rotations, subjects readily adapt reaching movements, such that the virtual display of the hand is brought to the target. Whereas this clearly reflects remapping of the relationship between hand movements and the visual display, the nature of this remapping is not well understood. We now examine whether such adaptation results in remapping of the position of the visually displayed target and the final limb position or between the target vector and the movement vector. The latter is defined relative to a starting position, whereas the former should be independent of the starting position. Subjects first adapted to a 30° rotation during reaching movements made from a single starting location to four different target locations. After adaptation, generalization trials were introduced, during which reaching movements were made under the same visual rotation condition but started from one of two locations outside the practiced workspace. These trials were directed to either the previously practiced targets or new targets that reflected the direction and distance of the practiced trials. Generalization was greatest for movements made in similar directions, regardless of changes in spatial location. Most significantly, when reaching to the previously adapted targets, subjects did not reach to the previously learned limb positions but rather to positions that reflected a near 30° rotation of the new target vector. These results indicate that learned visuomotor rotations remap the representations of movement vectors and not final positions of the limb in the workspace.

[1]  M. Latash,et al.  Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Sainburg Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  M Latash,et al.  [Hypothesis on the equilibrium point and variability of amplitude, speed and time of single-joint movement]. , 1990, Biofizika.

[5]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Remembered positions: stored locations or stored postures? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  A model for reaching control. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[9]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Processes controlling arm movements in monkeys. , 1978, Science.

[11]  Slobodan Jaric,et al.  The effects of practice on movement distance and final position reproduction: implications for the equilibrium-point control of movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Kinematics and Dynamics Are Not Represented Independently in Motor Working Memory: Evidence from an Interference Study , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Jaric,et al.  Effects of practice on final position reproduction , 1992, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  J. Cooke,et al.  Initial agonist burst duration depends on movement amplitude , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[18]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  J. Cooke,et al.  Initial agonist burst is modified by perturbations preceding movement , 1986, Brain Research.

[21]  C. Ghez,et al.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  R G Meulenbroek,et al.  Planning reaching and grasping movements: simulating reduced movement capabilities in spastic hemiparesis. , 2001, Motor control.

[26]  J. Cooke,et al.  Responses to force perturbations preceding voluntary human arm movements , 1981, Brain Research.

[27]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Roland R. Lee,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning , 1997, Nature.

[33]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  P. Viviani,et al.  Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  M. Kawato,et al.  Adaptive internal model of intrinsic kinematics involved in learning an aiming task. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.