Intense dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide compared with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer: mature results of an AGO phase III study.

PURPOSE Patients with primary breast cancer who have extensive axillary lymph node involvement have a poor prognosis after conventional adjuvant therapy. We compared intense dose-dense (IDD) adjuvant chemotherapy with conventionally scheduled adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, phase III trial, a total of 1,284 eligible patients with four or more involved axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive IDD sequential epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (IDD-ETC) every 2 weeks or conventionally scheduled epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel every three weeks. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS At a median follow-up of 62 months, 5-year event-free survival rates were 62% in the conventional arm and 70% in the IDD-ETC arm, representing a 28% reduction of the relative risk of relapse (P < .001). This benefit was independent of menopausal, hormone receptor, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. The 5-year overall survival rates were 77% versus 82%, representing a 24% reduction of the relative risk of death (P = .0285). IDD therapy was associated with significantly more nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities, but no treatment-related death occurred. Four occurrences of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were observed in the IDD-ETC arm. No severe congestive heart failure was reported. CONCLUSION IDD-ETC was less well tolerated compared with conventional chemotherapy but significantly improved event-free and overall survivals in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer who had four or more positive axillary lymph nodes.

[1]  J. Peto,et al.  Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures , 1972 .

[2]  H. Earl,et al.  Epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Berry,et al.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. , 2006, JAMA.

[4]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Randomized trial of letrozole following tamoxifen as extended adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive breast cancer: updated findings from NCIC CTG MA.17. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  P. Bruzzi,et al.  Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: results from a randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  W. Gradishar Randomized Trial of Letrozole Following Tamoxifen as Extended Adjuvant Therapy in Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Updated Findings From NCIC CTG MA.17 , 2006 .

[7]  M. Levine,et al.  Analysis of dose intensity for adjuvant chemotherapy trials in stage II breast cancer. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  J. Bergh,et al.  Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in trials of adjuvant epirubicin for early breast cancer: correlation with doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  H. Skipper,et al.  Kinetics of mammary tumor cell growth and implications for therapy , 1971, Cancer.

[10]  J. Bryant,et al.  Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  C. Hudis,et al.  5-year results of dose-intensive sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for women with high-risk node-positive breast cancer: A phase II study. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  S. Schraub,et al.  Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Larry Norton,et al.  HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. Tu,et al.  Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  R. Kreienberg,et al.  Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin(E), paclitaxel (T) and cyclophosphamide (C) (ETC) is superior to conventional dosed chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients (≥ 4 +LN). First results of an AGO-trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  V. Noronha,et al.  Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Richard L Schilsky,et al.  Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  The impact of epoetin-alpha on anemia, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and survival in breast cancer patients (pts) treated with dose-dense sequential chemotherapy: Mature results of an AGO phase III study (ETC trial) , 2007 .

[19]  Xueri Li,et al.  Sequential Adjuvant Epirubicin-Based and Docetaxel Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients:The FNCLCC PACS 01 Trial , 2009 .

[20]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  R. Gelber,et al.  Adjuvant chemotherapy with sequential or concurrent anthracycline and docetaxel: Breast International Group 02-98 randomized trial. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  Marek Pawlicki,et al.  Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. Ledermann,et al.  Phase III trial of high-dose sequential chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support compared with standard dose chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: intergroup trial of the AGO-Ovar/AIO and EBMT. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  O. Dizdar,et al.  Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  L. Norton A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth. , 1988, Cancer research.

[27]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .