Reversing the Trend of Engineering Enrollment Declines With Innovative Outreach, Recruiting, and Retention Programs

This paper discusses an all-encompassing approach to increase the number of students in engineering through innovative outreach, recruiting, and retention programs. Prior to adopting these programs, the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at the University of Oklahoma (OU), Norman, experienced a reduction in engineering enrollment similar to the trend that has occurred across the U.S. over the last few years. As a result, the school investigated the key factors that influence selection of engineering as a career path and initiated a corrective program to reverse this trend. The program involves focusing on the present through retention, on the immediate future through recruiting, and on the distant future through outreach. The focus of all of these programs is to mobilize the OU-ECE faculty and student body to present advanced engineering technologies, innovative demonstrations, and hands-on activities at a level that the individual student can understand and appreciate. Student surveys and interviews are used to assess the program qualitatively, and OU-ECE enrollment numbers are used as a quantitative assessment.

[1]  Richard Gale,et al.  Generation NXT: Building Young Engineers With LEGOs , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[2]  Matthew Ohland,et al.  Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation and Retention: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study , .

[3]  R. Layton,et al.  Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs , 2008 .

[4]  C. Vogt,et al.  Faculty as a Critical Juncture in Student Retention and Performance in Engineering Programs , 2008 .

[5]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[6]  S. G. Brainard,et al.  A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.

[7]  José Eduardo Ribeiro Cury,et al.  Practicing engineering in a freshman introductory course , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[8]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  Gary Gereffi,et al.  Getting the Numbers Right: International Engineering Education in the United States, China, and India , 2008 .

[10]  L.J. Bottomley,et al.  Women in engineering at North Carolina State University: an effort in recruitment, retention, and encouragement , 1999, FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011.

[11]  Chad Davis.  Work in progress - FIRST robotics competition from the perspective of a first time mentor , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[12]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Understanding Our Students: A Longitudinal‐Study of Success and Failure in Engineering With Implications for Increased Retention , 2007 .

[13]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2006 .

[14]  系統管理者,et al.  Vision and Mission , 2010 .

[15]  Andrew B. Williams.  The qualitative impact of using LEGO MINDSTORMS robots to teach computer engineering , 2003, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[16]  Beryl Lieff Benderly,et al.  Rising Above "The Gathering Storm" , 2007 .

[17]  J. Froyd,et al.  Integrated Engineering Curricula , 2005 .

[18]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[19]  Charles E. McDowell,et al.  Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality , 2006, CACM.

[20]  L. Nilson.  Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors , 1997 .