Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement

Previous research indicates that age, gender, and prior academic achievement have direct effects on students' approaches to learning and their academic performance and progression. Here an investigation is reported which explores the relationships between 60 first-year undergraduate accounting and business economics students' approaches to learning, their age, gender, prior academic achievement, and their subsequent academic performance and progression. Linear regression analyses identified the strongest predictor of first-year academic performance and progression as prior academic achievement (i.e. performance in school examinations). Cluster analysis of the six dimensions of the RASI, academic performance and progression revealed two clusters. The first cluster (labelled 'effective learner') had a 75.0% rate of progression; the second (labelled 'ineffective learner') had only an 11.7% rate of progression. 'Effective learner' scores high on Deep Approach and low on Surface Approach, while the 'ineffective learner' scores low on Deep Approach and high on Surface Approach.

[1]  John A. Clarke,et al.  Helping students become better learners: a case study in teacher education , 1991 .

[2]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[3]  Kim B. Tan,et al.  A NOTE ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF DEEP‐ELABORATIVE VERSUS SHALLOW‐REITERATIVE INFORMATION PROCESSING STUDENTS , 1990 .

[4]  M. G. Eley,et al.  Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students , 1992 .

[5]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Identifying distinctive approaches to studying , 1979 .

[6]  D. Child,et al.  BIGGS' SPQ: A BRITISH STUDY OF ITS INTERNAL STRUCTURE , 1984 .

[7]  Angus Duff,et al.  Quality of Learning on an MBA Programme: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance , 2003 .

[8]  R. Debus,et al.  Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[9]  M. Pendlebury,et al.  From fresher to finalist 1 , 1993 .

[10]  P. Booth,et al.  The quality of learning in accounting education: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance , 1999 .

[11]  Carol A. Christensen,et al.  Cognitive strategies and study habits: An analysis of the measurement of tertiary students' learning. , 1991 .

[12]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying in distance education , 1999 .

[13]  Keithia Lynne Wilson,et al.  Gender differences in approaches to learning in first year psychology students , 1996 .

[14]  S. Ravenscroft,et al.  The effect of grading policies and student gender on academic performance , 1992 .

[15]  A. Duff.  Approaches to learning: factor invariance across gender , 2002 .

[16]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature Students in Higher Education: II. An Investigation of Approaches to Studying and Academic Performance. , 1995 .

[17]  Angus Duff,et al.  A note on the reliability and validity of a 30‐item version of Entwistle & Tait's Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory , 1997 .

[18]  Velda McCune,et al.  Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts , 2000 .

[19]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Analysis and development of students' skill in selfregulated learning , 1988 .

[20]  L. Hand,et al.  Evaluation of student feedback , 2001 .

[21]  J. Biggs.  What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[22]  N. Entwistle,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING , 1981 .

[23]  David Kember,et al.  A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student , 1991 .

[24]  John Biggs,et al.  Faculty patterns in study behaviour , 1970 .

[25]  T. Dunne,et al.  Individual study orchestrations and their association with learning outcome , 1990 .

[26]  A. Duff.  Access policy and approaches to learning , 1999 .

[27]  A Fransson,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning: IV -- effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. , 1977, The British journal of educational psychology.

[28]  Lorraine Staehr,et al.  Improving students' learning approaches through intervention in an information systems learning environment , 2005 .

[29]  Barbara Flood,et al.  The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students , 2002 .

[30]  V. Beattie,et al.  Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? , 1997 .

[31]  David Watkins,et al.  Identifying the Study Process Dimensions of Australian University Students , 1982 .

[32]  R. Snow.  Aptitude, instruction, and individual development , 1989 .

[33]  A. Cliff.  Dissonance in first-year students’ reflections on their learning , 2000 .

[34]  David Kember,et al.  Approaches to Study of Distance Education Students , 1986 .

[35]  K. Thomas,et al.  Gender and the Arts/Science Divide in Higher Education. , 1988 .

[36]  David Watkins,et al.  A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. , 1985 .

[37]  J. Biggs.  THE ROLE OF METALEARNING IN STUDY PROCESSES , 1985 .

[38]  S. Severiens,et al.  Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis , 1994 .

[39]  A. Duff.  RESEARCH NOTE Validating the learning styles questionnaire and inventory of learning processes in accounting: a research note , 1997 .

[40]  Jan H. F. Meyer.  The modelling of ‘dissonant’ study orchestration in higher education , 2000 .

[41]  R. Waugh,et al.  A Rasch measurement model analysis of the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. , 1998, The British journal of educational psychology.

[42]  Falconer Mitchell.  High school accounting and student performance in the first level university accounting course: A UK study , 1988 .

[43]  R. Davidson.  Relationship of study approach and exam performance , 2002 .

[44]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  A comparative study of approaches to studying in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[45]  P. J. Janssen.  Studaxology: the expertise students need to be effective in higher education , 1996 .

[46]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory , 1993 .

[47]  David Kember,et al.  Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to learning , 1999 .

[48]  Hian Chye Koh,et al.  The determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme , 1999 .

[49]  C. A. Merwe,et al.  Gender as a factor in student learning: preliminary findings , 1989, Medical education.

[50]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes , 1991 .

[51]  Wayne A. Johnson,et al.  A model for screening and classifying potential accounting majors , 1983 .

[52]  Eugene Sadler-Smith,et al.  Approaches to Studying: age, gender and academic performance , 1996 .

[53]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment , 1979 .

[54]  C. D. Miller.  Learning Approaches and Motives: Male and Female Differences and Implications for Learning Assistance Programs. , 1990 .

[55]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender, subject and context as determinants of approaches to studying in higher education , 1995 .

[56]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies , 1996 .

[57]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Cognitive Prerequisites and Learning , 2002 .

[58]  Angus Duff,et al.  The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) and its Use in Management Education , 2004 .

[59]  Barbara Flood,et al.  Approaches to Learning of European Business Students , 2002 .

[60]  R. Clarke.  Students' approaches to learning in an innovative medical school: a cross-sectional study. , 1986, The British journal of educational psychology.

[61]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature students in higher education: I. A literature survey on approaches to studying , 1994 .