Data-driven semi-supervised and supervised learning algorithms for health monitoring of pipes

Abstract The use of guided ultrasonic waves (GUWs) for SHM of pipelines has been a popular method for over three decades. The superiority of GUWs over traditional vibration-based techniques lie in its ability to detect small damages (cracks and corrosion) over a satisfactory length of a pipeline. The physics of the system, however, is extremely involved that renders model-based techniques computationally prohibitive. Data-driven approaches, based on statistical learning algorithmsare far more suitable in such scenarios. In this paper, we propose two data-driven techniques, involving a semi-supervised and a supervised learning approach, for damage detection in pipes. In addition to circumventing the use of a model-based approach, the proposed approaches also aid in reducing the number of sensors deployed, leading to reductions in maintenance costs. The semi-supervised learning-based approach detects the presence of damage using a hierarchical clustering-based algorithm. The supervised learning-based approach performs damage localization in a multinomial logistic regression framework. We validate the proposed algorithms by acquiring guided wave responses from experimental pipes in a pitch-catch configuration using low-cost piezoelectric transducers. We demonstrate that our fully data-driven techniques accurately detect and localize cracks on two cast iron pipes of different lengths using a combination of two sensors.

[1]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Causes, cost consequences, and risk implications of accidents in US hazardous liquid pipeline infrastructure , 2009, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[2]  Yinghui Lu,et al.  Numerical implementation of matching pursuit for the analysis of complex ultrasonic signals , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[3]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Next generation guided wave health monitoring for long range inspection of pipes , 2009 .

[4]  J. Rose,et al.  Natural beam focusing of non-axisymmetric guided waves in large-diameter pipes. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[5]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[6]  Lingyu Yu,et al.  Corrosion detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors using pitch-catch waves and cross-time–frequency analysis , 2012 .

[7]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[8]  Joel B. Harley,et al.  Damage Detection in Pipes under Changing Environmental Conditions Using Embedded Piezoelectric Transducers and Pattern Recognition Techniques , 2013 .

[9]  M. Lowe,et al.  The Reflection of Guided Waves From Circumferential Notches in Pipes , 1998 .

[10]  Moon Ho Park,et al.  Ultrasonic inspection of long steel pipes using Lamb waves , 1996 .

[11]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Ultrasonic Guided Waves in Structural Health Monitoring , 2004 .

[12]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Sparsity-based approaches for damage detection in plates , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[13]  Zheng Liu,et al.  State-of-the-Art Review of Technologies for Pipe Structural Health Monitoring , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[14]  Rakesh Malladi,et al.  Modelling ultrasound guided wave propagation for plate thickness measurement , 2014, Smart Structures.

[15]  Tribikram Kundu,et al.  Underwater Pipeline Inspection Using Guided Waves , 2001, NDE Challenges of the 21st Century: Theory to Practice.

[16]  Mario Bergés,et al.  Robust ultrasonic damage detection under complex environmental conditions using singular value decomposition. , 2015, Ultrasonics.

[17]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[18]  Salvatore Salamone,et al.  A multi-helical ultrasonic imaging approach for the structural health monitoring of cylindrical structures , 2015 .

[19]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Peter Cawley,et al.  THE REFLECTION OF GUIDED WAVES FROM NOTCHES IN PIPES: A GUIDE FOR INTERPRETING CORROSION MEASUREMENTS , 2004 .

[21]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Baseline-free pipeline monitoring using optical fiber–guided laser ultrasonics , 2012 .

[22]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  A study of two unsupervised data driven statistical methodologies for detecting and classifying damages in structural health monitoring , 2013 .

[23]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures , 1993 .

[24]  Joel B. Harley,et al.  Toward Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring: Application of Machine Learning and Signal Processing to Damage Detection , 2013, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[25]  Hae Young Noh,et al.  Sparse representation of ultrasonic guided‐waves for robust damage detection in pipelines under varying environmental and operational conditions , 2016 .

[26]  M. Lowe,et al.  Defect detection in pipes using guided waves , 1998 .