Gender and the GeoWeb: divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information

The GeoWeb presents an opportunity to expand the array of potential contributors describing the earth through digital geographic information. However, the adoption of user-generated geographic information has not been uniform, resulting in an uneven distribution of content and more nuanced digital divides. This paper uses a survey of Internet users to measure the gender divide in the contributions of cartographic information to the Internet and examine the impact of this divide within the context of OpenStreetMap and Google MapMaker. This paper argues that in both publicly available basemaps the gender divide results in men serving as the gatekeepers of local knowledge leading to gendered user-generated representations. As these digital basemaps are reproduced and utilized by almost every mobile application or web-based map, the gender divisions in the creators and content are endlessly reproduced.

[1]  Prostitution In Nevada,et al.  ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers , 1974 .

[2]  Donna Harawy.  Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[3]  J. B. Harley,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP , 1989 .

[4]  M. Mcneil.  Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1992 .

[5]  D. Rocheleau,et al.  Gendered resource mapping: Focusing on women's spaces in the landscape , 1994 .

[6]  M. Ruffin.  On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[7]  K. England.  Who Will Mind the Baby?: Geographies of Childcare and Working Mothers , 1996 .

[8]  J. Sempsey.  The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives , 1998 .

[9]  M. Kwan.  Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space–Time Measures , 1999 .

[10]  M. Kwan.  Gender, the Home-Work Link, and Space-Time Patterns of Nonemployment Activities , 1999 .

[11]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  Geographies of the information society , 2003 .

[12]  Bruce Bimber.  Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet 1 , 2000 .

[13]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching , 2001 .

[14]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Feminist Geography and GIS ” Gender , Place and Culture , 9 ( 3 ) : 271-279 Is GIS for Women ? Reflections on the Critical Discourse in the 1990 s , 2002 .

[15]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon experience , 2002, SGCS.

[16]  M. Saral,et al.  Mapping Women ’ s Worlds : knowledge , power and the bounds of GIS , 2002 .

[17]  Marianna Pavlovskaya,et al.  Mapping Urban Change and Changing GIS: Other views of economic restructuring , 2002 .

[18]  Jeremy W. Crampton,et al.  The Political Mapping of Cyberspace , 2003 .

[19]  Bruce Bimber.  Bimber Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet , 2003 .

[20]  Geraldine Pratt,et al.  Valuing Childcare: Troubles in Suburbia , 2003 .

[21]  H. Ono,et al.  Gender and the Internet , 2003 .

[22]  E. Hargittai,et al.  An Evolving Gender Digital Divide? , 2004 .

[23]  Sara McLafferty,et al.  Women and GIS: Geospatial Technologies and Feminist Geographies , 2005, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[24]  I. Wasserman,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Causes of Variation in Access, Level, and Scope of Use , 2005 .

[25]  Brenda Parker.  Constructing Community Through Maps? Power and Praxis in Community Mapping* , 2006 .

[26]  Christopher C. Miller,et al.  A Beast in the Field: The Google Maps Mashup as GIS/2 , 2006, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[27]  H. Miller.  Societies and cities in the age of instant access , 2007 .

[28]  Victoria Lawson,et al.  Geographies of Care and Responsibility , 2007 .

[29]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  M. Goodchild.  Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[31]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[32]  Matthew Zook,et al.  From cyberspace to DigiPlace: Visibility in an age of information and mobility , 2007 .

[33]  David L. Tulloch.  Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping , 2007, First Monday.

[34]  Marianna Pavlovskaya,et al.  Feminism and Geographic Information Systems: From a Missing Object to a Mapping Subject , 2007 .

[35]  David L. Tulloch.  Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games , 2008 .

[36]  Alfred A. Bove,et al.  Theorizing the digital divide: Information and communication technology use frameworks among poor women using a telemedicine system , 2008 .

[37]  M. Goodchild.  Commentary: whither VGI? , 2008 .

[38]  S. Jeffreys,et al.  Keeping Women Down and Out: The Strip Club Boom and the Reinforcement of Male Dominance , 2008, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[39]  Alex Singleton,et al.  Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb , 2008 .

[40]  S. Elwood.  Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS , 2008 .

[41]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth , 2009 .

[42]  M. Haklay.  How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[43]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Production, Consumption, Prosumption , 2010 .

[44]  S. Gorman,et al.  Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: A Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake , 2010 .

[45]  T. Misa.  Cultural Perceptions of Computers in Norway 1980-2007 , 2010 .

[46]  T. Misa.  Gender Codes: Why Women Are Leaving Computing , 2010 .

[47]  Mark Graham,et al.  NEOGEOGRAPHY AND THE PALIMPSESTS OF PLACE: WEB 2.0 AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A VIRTUAL EARTH , 2010 .

[48]  S. Elwood.  Geographic information science: emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web , 2010 .

[49]  Vyron Antoniou,et al.  How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus’ Law to Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010 .

[50]  John Riedl,et al.  WP:clubhouse?: an exploration of Wikipedia's gender imbalance , 2011, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[51]  S. Elwood,et al.  Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb , 2011 .