Differences between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of education: profiles to describe congruence and friction

Teachers and students have their own perceptions of education. Congruent perceptions contribute to optimal teaching–learning processes and help achieving best learning outcomes. This study investigated patterns in differences between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of their learning environment. Student profiles were identified taking into account the degree of congruence/friction with teachers’ perceptions. Teacher profiles were identified based on their differences in perceptions to students. Profiles were validated with regard to learning-related student characteristics and approaches to teaching. Tenth graders (N = 994) of four secondary schools filled out the Inventory of Perceived Study Environment-Extended (IPSEE) and the Inventory of Learning Styles. Their teachers (N = 136) filled out the teacher version of the IPSEE and the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Latent class analyses were conducted to define profiles with respect to the magnitude of differences in perceptions. Results showed three student profiles: Closest match profile (30 %), intermediate profile (59 %), and distal profile (11 %). While closest match students had desirable learning-related characteristics, others did not and are at risk for destructive friction. Two teacher profiles described idealistic teachers (70 %) and adaptive teachers (30 %), which related to approaches to teaching. Subgroups of students and teachers provide a comprehensive picture of those who are at risk because of too large differences in perceptions. This study stresses that differences in perceptions deserve detailed attention for optimising learning environments. Involving both students and teachers in the instructional design process could be a way to better account for perceptions of both stakeholders.

[1]  Margaret C. Donaldson.  Children's Minds , 1978 .

[2]  T. Seidel.  The role of student characteristics in studying micro teaching–learning environments , 2007 .

[3]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Patterns in Student Learning: Relationships Between Learning Strategies, Conceptions of Learning, and Learning Orientations , 2004 .

[4]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Classroom Environment Instruments: Development, Validity and Applications , 1998 .

[5]  Linda Murphy,et al.  Tutor and student perceptions of what makes an effective distance language teacher , 2011 .

[6]  Karen D. Könings,et al.  Participatory design in secondary education: is it a good idea? Students’ and teachers’ opinions on its desirability and feasibility , 2007 .

[7]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[8]  L. Feinstein,et al.  Unexpected Pathways Through Education: Why Do Some Students Not Succeed in School and What Helps Others Beat the Odds? , 2008, The Journal of social issues.

[9]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Negative Effects of Traditional Middle Schools on Students' Motivation , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[10]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. , 1985 .

[11]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments , 1990 .

[12]  F. Tuerlinckx,et al.  Task perception as a mediating variable: a contribution to the validation of instructional knowledge. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[13]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Teachers' Perspectives on Innovations: Implications for Educational Design. , 2007 .

[14]  Gellof Kanselaar,et al.  Learning Environment Perceptions of European University Students , 1999 .

[15]  Frederick L. Oswald,et al.  Perceived fit with an academic environment: Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes , 2008 .

[16]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Participatory design in secondary education: Its desirability and feasibility according to teachers and students. , 2007 .

[17]  A. Cook‐Sather.  Listening to Students about Learning Differences , 2003 .

[18]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[19]  Jan D. Vermunt,et al.  Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures , 2002 .

[20]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Ten steps to complex learning (2nd ed.) , 2012 .

[21]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Powerful learning environments : unravelling basic components and dimensions , 2003 .

[22]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. , 1997, The British journal of educational psychology.

[23]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environments: what students think , 2007 .

[24]  Children's Views of the Primary Classroom as an Environment for Working and Learning , 2000 .

[25]  Yaron Doppelt.  Impact of science-technology learning environment characteristics on learning outcomes: pupils’ perceptions and gender differences , 2004 .

[26]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Paul Ginns,et al.  Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised Approaches to teaching inventory , 2005 .

[28]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Exploring high school students' and teachers' preferences toward the constructivist Internet‐based learning environments in Taiwan , 2005 .

[29]  Joseph S. Renzulli,et al.  Abilities, Interests, and Styles as Aptitudes for Learning: A Person-Situation Interaction Perspective , 2014 .

[30]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Contemporary Approaches to Research on Learning Environments Worldviews , 2006 .

[31]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Does a New Learning Environment Come Up to Students' Expectations? A Longitudinal Study , 2008 .

[32]  den Pj Perry Brok,et al.  Convergence and divergence between students' and teachers' perceptions of instructional behaviour in Dutch secondary education. , 2006 .

[33]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[34]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles , 2001 .

[35]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Student and Teacher Perceptions of the Environment of Elementary School Classrooms , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[36]  J. Elen,et al.  Metacognitive instructional knowledge: cognitive mediation and instructional design , 1999 .

[37]  Gert Rijlaarsdam,et al.  Importance in instructional text: teachers' and students' perceptions of task demands , 2002 .

[38]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Congruence and friction between learning and teaching , 1999 .

[39]  Erik Roelofs,et al.  Constructivism and Authentic Pedagogy: State of the Art and Recent Developments in the Dutch National Curriculum in Secondary Education. , 1999 .

[40]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .