Sampling rate and misidentification of Lévy and non-Lévy movement paths.

A large number of empirical studies have attributed Lévy search patterns to the foraging movements of animals. Typically, this is done by fitting a power-law distribution with an exponent of 1 < mu < or = 3 to the observed step lengths. Most studies record the animal's location at equally spaced time intervals, which are sometimes significantly longer than the natural time scale of the animal's movements. The collected data thus represent a subsample of the animal's movement. In this paper, the effect of subsampling on the observed properties of both Lévy and non-Lévy simulated movement paths is investigated. We find that the apparent properties of the observed movement path can be sensitive to the sampling rate even though Lévy search patterns are supposedly scale-independent. We demonstrate that, in certain contexts and dependent on the sampling rate used in observation, it is possible to misidentify a non-Lévy movement path as being a Lévy path. We also demonstrate that a Lévy movement path can be misidentified as a non-Lévy path, but this is dependent on the value of mu of the original simulated path, with the greatest uncertainty for mu = 2. We discuss the implications of these results in the context of studies of animal movements and foraging behavior.

[1]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effects of quality and quantity of social information at different neighbour distances , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Quantifying insect movement in the field , 1991 .

[3]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Germinal Cocho,et al.  Scale-free foraging by primates emerges from their interaction with a complex environment , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Using likelihood to test for Lévy flight search patterns and for general power-law distributions in nature. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  E A Codling,et al.  Sampling rate effects on measurements of correlated and biased random walks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[8]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[9]  H. Stanley,et al.  Lévy flights in random searches , 2000 .

[10]  A. Hofgaard,et al.  Foraging and movement paths of female reindeer: insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks, and Lévy flights , 2002 .

[11]  H. Fritz,et al.  Scale–dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long–range foraging seabird , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  H. Larralde,et al.  Lévy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  André W. Visser,et al.  Plankton motility patterns and encounter rates , 2006, Oecologia.

[14]  S. Benhamou HOW MANY ANIMALS REALLY DO THE LÉVY WALK , 2007 .

[15]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Scale‐free dynamics in the movement patterns of jackals , 2002 .

[16]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Honeybees use a Lévy flight search strategy and odour-mediated anemotaxis to relocate food sources , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Stefano Focardi,et al.  Adaptive Lévy Walks in Foraging Fallow Deer , 2009, PloS one.

[18]  N. Hill,et al.  A biased random walk model for the trajectories of swimming micro-organisms. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Ralf Metzler,et al.  Lévy strategies in intermittent search processes are advantageous , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  O Bénichou,et al.  Two-dimensional intermittent search processes: An alternative to Lévy flight strategies. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Free-Flight Odor Tracking in Drosophila Is Consistent with an Optimal Intermittent Scale-Free Search , 2007, PloS one.

[22]  F. J. Quirijns,et al.  Linkage between fishers' foraging, market and fish stocks density: Examples from some North Sea fisheries , 2007 .

[23]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  LÉVY PROCESSES IN ANIMAL MOVEMENT: AN EVOLUTIONARY HYPOTHESIS , 2007 .

[24]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Avoidance of conspecific odour trails results in scale-free movement patterns and the execution of an optimal searching strategy , 2007 .

[25]  R. Menzel,et al.  Displaced honey bees perform optimal scale-free search flights. , 2007, Ecology.

[26]  B. Enquist,et al.  On estimating the exponent of power-law frequency distributions. , 2008, Ecology.

[27]  A. James,et al.  Optimizing the encounter rate in biological interactions: Ballistic versus Lévy versus Brownian strategies. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Environmental context explains Lévy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators , 2010, Nature.

[29]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches , 2008 .

[30]  Deborah Austin,et al.  Intraspecific variation in movement patterns: modeling individual behaviour in a large marine predator , 2004 .

[31]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? , 2008, Ecology.

[32]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses , 1996, Nature.

[33]  S. Benhamou,et al.  Spatial analysis of animals' movements using a correlated random walk model* , 1988 .

[34]  M. Plank,et al.  Optimal foraging: Lévy pattern or process? , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[35]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Lévy flight patterns are predicted to be an emergent property of a bumblebees’ foraging strategy , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  Lévy trajectories of Peruvian purse-seiners as an indicator of the spatial distribution of anchovy ( Engraulis ringens ) , 2005 .

[37]  D. Boyer,et al.  Modeling the searching behavior of social monkeys , 2004 .

[38]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Necessary criterion for distinguishing true superdiffusion from correlated random walk processes. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  Andy Reynolds,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? Comment. , 2008, Ecology.

[40]  F. Bartumeus,et al.  Helical Lévy walks: Adjusting searching statistics to resource availability in microzooplankton , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Denis Boyer,et al.  Evidence for biological L\'evy flights stands , 2008, 0802.1762.

[42]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Adaptive Lévy walks can outperform composite Brownian walks in non-destructive random searching scenarios , 2009 .

[43]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  The influence of turning angles on the success of non-oriented animal searches. , 2008, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[44]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Human memory retrieval as Lévy foraging , 2007 .

[45]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[46]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Optimal random searches of revisitable targets: Crossover from superdiffusive to ballistic random walks , 2004 .

[47]  A M Reynolds,et al.  Appetitive flight patterns of male Agrotis segetum moths over landscape scales. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[49]  Marcos C. Santos,et al.  Dynamical robustness of Lévy search strategies. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[50]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.