Material and Energy Productivity

Resource productivity, measured as GDP output per resource input, is a widespread sustainability indicator combining economic and environmental information. Resource productivity is ubiquitous, from the IPAT identity to the analysis of dematerialization trends and policy goals. High resource productivity is interpreted as the sign of a resource-efficient, and hence more sustainable, economy. Its inverse, resource intensity (resource per GDP) has the reverse behavior, with higher values indicating environmentally inefficient economies. In this study, we investigate the global systematic relationship between material, energy and carbon productivities, and economic activity. We demonstrate that different types of materials and energy exhibit fundamentally different behaviors, depending on their international income elasticities of consumption. Biomass is completely inelastic, whereas fossil fuels tend to scale proportionally with income. Total materials or energy, as aggregates, have intermediate behavior, depending on the share of fossil fuels and other elastic resources. We show that a small inelastic share is sufficient for the total resource productivity to be significantly correlated with income. Our analysis calls into question the interpretation of resource productivity as a sustainability indicator. We conclude with suggestions for potential alternatives.

[1]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy-GDP ratio to composite efficiency index , 2006 .

[2]  John Barrett,et al.  Distributional effects of climate change taxation: the case of the UK. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  John Dimitropoulos,et al.  Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: An overview of the state of knowledge , 2007 .

[4]  Hal Turton,et al.  Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries , 2002 .

[5]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Vicent Alcántara,et al.  Inequality of energy intensities across OECD countries: a note , 2004 .

[7]  S. Davis,et al.  Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  C. Hall,et al.  Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective , 1984, Science.

[9]  Rutger Hoekstra,et al.  Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy , 2002 .

[10]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Energy efficiency, sustainability and economic growth , 2007 .

[11]  P. Ferrão,et al.  A new environmental Kuznets curve? Relationship between direct material input and income per capita: evidence from industrialised countries , 2003 .

[12]  L. Lovins,et al.  Factor Four – Doubling Wealth, Halving Resource Use , 1997, Energy Exploration & Exploitation.

[13]  L. Schipper,et al.  On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries , 2000 .

[14]  R. Madlener,et al.  ENERGY REBOUND AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A REVIEW OF THE MAIN ISSUES AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2009 .

[15]  P E Waggoner,et al.  A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Heinz Schandl,et al.  Regional Patterns in Global Resource Extraction , 2006 .

[17]  Bernd Meyer,et al.  Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe , 2008 .

[18]  J. Sun Three types of decline in energy intensity—an explanation for the decline of energy intensity in some developing countries , 2003 .

[19]  N. Schulz The Direct Material Inputs into Singapore's Development , 2007, Journal of industrial ecology.

[20]  J. Ramos-Martín,et al.  Historical Analysis of Energy Intensity of Spain: From a “Conventional View” to an “Integrated Assessment” , 2001 .

[21]  M. Ruth,et al.  Indicators of Dematerialization and the Materials Intensity of Use , 1998 .

[22]  J. Goldemberg A note on the energy intensity of developing countries , 1996 .

[23]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2000 .

[24]  J. Kaivo-oja,et al.  Linking analyses and environmental Kuznets curves for aggregated material flows in the EU , 2007 .

[25]  Y. Kaya Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth : Interpretation of proposed scenarios , 1989 .

[26]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A cross-country analysis of aggregate energy and carbon intensities , 2006 .

[27]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Sustainable growth and resource productivity : economic and global policy issues , 2009 .

[28]  H. Haberl,et al.  Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century , 2009 .

[29]  Samuel Niza,et al.  The material basis of the global economy Worldwide patterns of natural resource extraction and their implications for sustainable resource use policies , 2007 .

[30]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR , 2004 .

[31]  Jordi Roca,et al.  Energy intensity, CO2 emissions and the environmental Kuznets curve. The Spanish case , 2001 .

[32]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  The Energetic Metabolism of Societies Part I: Accounting Concepts , 2001 .

[34]  F. Buttel Social structure and energy efficiency: A preliminary cross-national analysis , 1978 .

[35]  M. Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a Vital Factor in Analysing the Environmental Impact of Socio-Economic Metabolism , 2001 .

[36]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints , 2008 .

[37]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Policy review on decoupling : development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries , 2005 .

[38]  J. Duro,et al.  International inequality in energy intensity levels and the role of production composition and energy efficiency: An analysis of OECD countries , 2010 .

[39]  Göran Englund,et al.  Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect : Evidence from USA and six European countries 1960-2002 , 2009 .

[40]  F. Krausmann,et al.  Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis , 2010 .

[41]  J. Roberts,et al.  Carbon intensity and economic development 1962–1991: A brief exploration of the environmental Kuznets curve , 1997 .

[42]  M. Chertow The IPAT Equation and Its Variants Changing Views of Technology and Environmental Impact , 2001 .

[43]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Changes in Population, Affluence, and Environmental Pressures During Industrialization: The Case of Austria 1830–1995 , 2001 .

[44]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change , 1999 .

[45]  Y. Moriguchi,et al.  What Factors Have Changed Japanese Resource Productivity? , 2008 .

[46]  S. H. Schurr,et al.  Energy use, Technological Change, and Productive Efficiency: An Economic-Historical Interpretation , 1984 .

[47]  B. Dawson,et al.  INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) , 2008 .

[48]  R. Auty Materials intensity of GDP: Research issues on the measurement and explanation of change , 1985 .

[49]  B. Commoner The Closing Circle , 1971 .

[50]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  Hiroaki Takiguchi,et al.  Japanese 3R Policies Based on Material Flow Analysis , 2008 .

[52]  Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  Comparison of the evolution of energy intensity in Spain and in the EU15. Why is Spain different , 2010 .

[53]  Heinz Schandl,et al.  Resource use and resource efficiency in the Asia-Pacific region , 2010 .