Design of the flexibly-reconfigurable roll forming process by a progressively-improving goal seeking approach

Abstract In order to design the flexibly-reconfigurable roll forming (FRRF) process, i.e., to find the set of process parameters that lead to the target 3D surface, an efficient approach is suggested in the present study that can significantly improve the production rate by FRRF where each process design is usually applied for a few or a single forming. According to this approach, the results of the already performed simulations and experiments are used as the sample data for constructing a surrogate model that receives a set of process parameters and returns the longitudinal radius. Then, the genetic algorithm (GA) is hired to explore the surrogate model to predict a set of process parameters that would lead to the target longitudinal radius. This is accomplished by a goal seeking approach and maximization of a conditional likelihood function. The predicted set of the process parameters is given to an efficient finite element method (FEM) to evaluate the corresponding longitudinal radius, and the new input-output pair is added to the sample data to improve the subsequent modeling and predictions. Then, the sequential modeling-prediction-evaluation (MPE) steps are repeated until the output is close enough to the target value. Since the results of all the simulations and experiments are saved in a database to be used for the next designs, the efficiency of the procedure is progressively improved because the surrogate model becomes more informative that in turn enables more exact predictions. However, constructing the surrogate model becomes slower as the number of sample points increases. For preventing this phenomenon, a modified version of the Morris-Mitchel criterion is utilized for subset sampling that selects a desired number of sample points with maximum space-filling property. In order to examine the suggested procedure, an initial database containing 54 sample points collected from experimental study is constructed. Then, the suggested approach is hired to reproduce 3 of the samples which are randomly selected from the database. The results show that this method can be used for design of FRRF process with a few or even one MPE that can significantly improve the production rate in this process.

[1]  Joseba Mendiguren,et al.  An analytical model for web-warping in variable width flexible roll forming , 2016 .

[2]  H. Theil Principles of econometrics , 1971 .

[3]  Daniel Kirk,et al.  Development of a reconfigurable tool for forming aircraft body panels , 1998 .

[4]  B. Kang,et al.  Numerical verification on formability of metallic alloys for skin structure using multi-point die-less forming , 2017 .

[5]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria , 2000 .

[6]  A. Forrester,et al.  Design and analysis of 'noisy' computer experiments , 2006 .

[7]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  A review on design, modeling and applications of computer experiments , 2006 .

[8]  E.v. Finckenstein,et al.  Flexible numerically controlled tool system for hydro-mechanical deep drawing , 1991 .

[9]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodeling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: How Far Have We Really Come? , 2014 .

[10]  Qiang Li,et al.  Simulation and experimental verification of flexible roll forming of steel sheets , 2014 .

[11]  Mingzhe Li,et al.  A novel continuous roll forming process of sheet metal based on bended rolls , 2014 .

[12]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization , 2007 .

[13]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[14]  Jeong Kim,et al.  Study on flexibly-reconfigurable roll forming process for multi-curved surface of sheet metal , 2014 .

[15]  Beom-Soo Kang,et al.  Surrogate-based multi-point forming process optimization for dimpling and wrinkling reduction , 2016 .

[16]  Mingzhe Li,et al.  Process design and longitudinal deformation prediction in continuous sheet metal roll forming for three-dimensional surface , 2014 .

[17]  Cai Zhongyi,et al.  Principle and theoretical analysis of continuous roll forming for three-dimensional surface parts , 2013 .

[18]  Dong-Yol Yang,et al.  Development of a Highly Flexible Incremental Roll Forming Process for the Manufacture of a Doubly Curved Sheet Metal , 2003 .

[19]  Jeong Kim,et al.  Rapid prediction of longitudinal curvature obtained by flexibly reconfigurable roll forming using response surface methodology , 2017 .

[20]  Dong-Yol Yang,et al.  Investigation of a new incremental counter forming in flexible roll forming to manufacture accurate profiles with variable cross-sections , 2014 .

[21]  Jeong Kim,et al.  Feasibility Study on Flexibly Reconfigurable Roll Forming Process for Sheet Metal and Its Implementation , 2014 .

[22]  Mingzhe Li,et al.  Surface flexible rolling for three-dimensional sheet metal parts , 2014 .

[23]  Young Hoon Moon,et al.  Flexible roll forming process design for variable cross-section profile , 2015 .

[24]  Zhi Qing Hu,et al.  Continuous flexible forming of three-dimensional surface parts using bendable rollers , 2009 .

[25]  Beom-Soo Kang,et al.  An efficient finite element approach for shape prediction in flexibly-reconfigurable roll forming process , 2018 .

[26]  Hong Wei Liu,et al.  Investigation and improvement of 3D rolling process for 3D surface parts , 2015 .

[27]  Jeong Kim,et al.  Deformation analysis and shape prediction for sheet forming using flexibly reconfigurable roll forming , 2016 .

[28]  Mingzhe Li,et al.  Longitudinal bending deformation analysis of sheet metal in continuous roll forming process , 2015 .

[29]  Daming Wang,et al.  Continuous-forming method for three-dimensional surface parts combining rolling process with multipoint-forming technology , 2014 .

[30]  Beom-Soo Kang,et al.  Shape error prediction and compensation of three-dimensional surface in flexibly-reconfigurable roll forming , 2015 .

[31]  Beom-Soo Kang,et al.  Reliability-based robust process optimization of multi-point dieless forming for product defect reduction , 2017 .

[32]  David E. Hardt,et al.  Sheet Metal Die Forming Using Closed-Loop Shape Control , 1982 .

[33]  Dong-Yol Yang,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation into cold incremental rolling of doubly curved plates for process design of a new LARS (line array roll set) rolling process , 2009 .

[34]  B. Kang,et al.  Surrogate-based Pareto optimization of annealing parameters for severely deformed steel , 2016 .

[35]  B. Kang,et al.  Specialized finite elements for numerical simulation of the flexibly-reconfigurable roll forming process , 2019, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.

[36]  Mingzhe Li,et al.  Multi-point forming: a flexible manufacturing method for a 3-d surface sheet , 1999 .

[37]  Naomasa Nakajima,et al.  A Newly Developed Technique to Fabricate Complicated Dies and Electrodes with Wires , 1969 .

[38]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Exploratory designs for computational experiments , 1995 .

[39]  Zhongyi Cai,et al.  Study on the continuous roll forming process of swept surface sheet metal part , 2014 .

[40]  Ming Zhe Li,et al.  Multi-point forming technology for sheet metal , 2002 .

[41]  Jeong Kim,et al.  Tool fabrication for composite forming of aircraft winglet using multi-point dieless forming , 2016 .

[42]  Daming Wang,et al.  Research on forming precision of flexible rolling method for three-dimensional surface parts through simulation , 2014 .