CD4 cell count as a surrogate endpoint in HIV clinical trials: a meta‐analysis of studies of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group

Objective:To evaluate initial changes in CD4 cell count as a surrogate endpoint for clinical outcome in HIV-infected patients. Design:Meta-analysis of all relevant Phase II and III randomized clinical trials undertaken by the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Methods:Individual patient data were obtained from each clinical trial, and the difference between a pair of treatments in their effect on clinical outcome (AIDS or death, or death alone) during 2 years of follow-up was evaluated. The proportion of treatment effect explained (PTE) was the proportion of this difference explained by the change in CD4 cell count 6 months after starting treatment, evaluated using proportional hazards models. A weighted average PTE across treatment comparisons was obtained. The association between the difference between treatments in clinical outcome, expressed as hazard ratio, and the difference in mean change in CD4 cell count was evaluated using regression analysis. Results:There were 15 clinical trials involving 24 treatment comparisons. The weighted average PTE for both progression to AIDS or death was 0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07–0.26] and for death was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00–0.20). There were significant associations between treatment differences in effect on AIDS or death, and on death alone, and the difference in mean change in CD4 cell count. A difference in mean change in CD4 cell count of 30 or 40 × 106/l or more in favor of the test treatment indicated with high probability that there was a corresponding difference in progression to AIDS or death. Conclusions:The small PTE suggest that other mechanisms of drug action not captured by initial change in CD4 cells are important. CD4 cell count is a weak surrogate endpoint, but has some value as an aid for screening treatments for drug development or preliminary regulatory approval.

[1]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Zidovudine compared with didanosine in patients with advanced HIV type 1 infection and little or no previous experience with zidovudine. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  Ann Collier,et al.  Combination and Monotherapy with Zidovudine and Zalcitabine in Patients with Advanced HIV Disease , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  D. Lin,et al.  Evaluating the role of CD4-lymphocyte counts as surrogate endpoints in human immunodeficiency virus clinical trials. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  T. Fleming,et al.  Perspective: validating surrogate markers--are we being naive? , 1997, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  M. Fischl,et al.  Zalcitabine Compared with Zidovudine in Patients with Advanced HIV-1 Infection Who Received Previous Zidovudine Therapy , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  J. Phair,et al.  A comparison of immediate with deferred zidovudine therapy for asymptomatic HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts of 500 or more per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  T. Merigan,et al.  A controlled trial comparing continued zidovudine with didanosine in human immunodeficiency virus infection. The NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Robert Schooley,et al.  CD4+ Lymphocytes Are an Incomplete Surrogate Marker for Clinical Progression in Persons with Asymptomatic HIV Infection Taking Zidovudine , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  S. Hammer,et al.  A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Study Team. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  T. Lancet,et al.  Randomised trial of addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to zidovudine-containing regimens for patients with HIV-1 infection: the CAESAR trial , 1997, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Gelman,et al.  Guideline for flow cytometric immunophenotyping: a report from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. , 1993, Cytometry.

[12]  M J Daniels,et al.  Meta-analysis for the evaluation of potential surrogate markers. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  Evaluating the role of CD4-lymphocyte counts as surrogate endpoints in human immunodeficiency virus clinical trials. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  M. Niu,et al.  Nevirapine, Zidovudine, and Didanosine Compared with Zidovudine and Didanosine in Patients with HIV-1 Infection , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  M D Hughes,et al.  Evaluating surrogate markers. , 1995, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology : official publication of the International Retrovirology Association.

[16]  M A Fischl,et al.  A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J. Phair,et al.  The duration of zidovudine benefit in persons with asymptomatic HIV infection. Prolonged evaluation of protocol 019 of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[18]  M. Gail,et al.  On the use of laboratory markers as surrogates for clinical endpoints in the evaluation of treatment for HIV infection. , 1990, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[19]  J. Darbyshire,et al.  Delta: a randomised double-blind controlled trial comparing combinations of zidovudine plus didanosine or zalcitabine with zidovudine alone in HIV-infected individuals , 1996, The Lancet.

[20]  M. Wulfsohn,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a reduced daily dose of zidovudine in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome , 1990 .

[21]  Douglas D. Richman,et al.  The safety and efficacy of zidovudine (AZT) in the treatment of subjects with mildly symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) infection a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 1990 .

[22]  K. K. Lai,et al.  Zidovudine Compared With Didanosine in Patients With Advanced HIV Type I Infection and Little or No Previous Experience With Zidovudine , 1995 .

[23]  A. Babiker,et al.  Can HIV-1 RNA viral load be used as a surrogate marker for clinical endpoints in HIV disease? , 1997 .

[24]  J. Kagan,et al.  Assessment of the effects of instrumentation, monoclonal antibody, and fluorochrome on flow cytometric immunophenotyping: a report based on 2 years of the NIAID DAIDS flow cytometry quality assessment program. , 1993, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[25]  P. Hartigan,et al.  Changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ lymphocyte counts and the risk of progression to AIDS. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on AIDS. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  B. Graubard,et al.  Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  W. Guerra Zidovudine in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. A controlled trial in persons with fewer than 500 CD4-positive cells per cubic millimeter , 1991 .

[28]  M. Hughes,et al.  Monitoring Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels in Addition to CD4+ Lymphocyte Count Improves Assessment of Antiretroviral Therapeutic Response , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  Roger Detels,et al.  Plasma Viral Load and CD4+ Lymphocytes as Prognostic Markers of HIV-1 Infection , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  P. Hartigan,et al.  Changes in Plasma HIV RNA Levels and CD4+ Lymphocyte Counts Predict Both Response to Antiretroviral Therapy and Therapeutic Failure , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[31]  F. Wit,et al.  Randomised trial of addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to zidovudine-containing regimens for patients with HIV-1 infection: the CAESAR trial , 1997 .

[32]  P Flandre,et al.  Estimating the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker. , 1999, Statistics in Medicine.

[33]  T. Merigan,et al.  Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection with saquinavir, zidovudine, and zalcitabine. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  S W Lagakos,et al.  Surrogate Markers in AIDS: Where Are We? Where Are We Going? , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  D. DeMets,et al.  Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled? , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.