Magnetic-field Exposures in the Workplace: Reference Distribution and Exposures in Occupational Groups.

Exposures to extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields were assessed by taking personal measurements with a dosimeter calibrated at 50 Hz with a bandwidth of 40-400 Hz. The study group was a population-based random sample of 1,098 Swedish men. Exposures were determined as workday mean, median, maximum, and standard deviation, and the time fraction of the day when exposures exceeded 0.20 µT. For workday means, the 50th percentile was 0.17 µT, and the 75th percentile was 0.27 µT. For median values, the 50th percentile was 0.11 µT and the 75th percentile was 0.16 µT. The strongest correlation (Spearman rank correlation = r&infs;) found was between the workday mean and the fraction of time above 0.20 µT (r&infs; = 0.89). The authors used the same data to estimate exposures for the 100 most common occupations according to the 1990 Swedish census. A minimum of four independent measurements for each occupation was required. Among occupations with low workday mean values were earth-moving machine operator, health care worker, and concrete worker. Among occupations with high workday mean exposures were welder and electrical or electronics engineer or technician. High exposure levels were also found in occupations outside the study base, such as train engine driver and glass, ceramic, or brick worker. Exposures to magnetic fields vary widely, since levels of exposure are strongly affected by factors such as duration of exposure and distance from the source. Large variations often found between individuals within occupations could reflect variations in tasks across different workdays for the particular occupations and/or local conditions such as tools and installations, and/or how the work is organized and performed.

[1]  D. Kriebel,et al.  Comparisons between magnetic field exposure indices in an automobile transmission plant. , 1995, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  H Kromhout,et al.  Assessment and grouping of occupational magnetic field exposure in five electric utility companies. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[3]  D A Savitz,et al.  Correlations among indices of electric and magnetic field exposure in electric utility workers. , 1994, Bioelectromagnetics.

[4]  D. Savitz DR. SAVITZ REPLIES , 1992 .

[5]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Cohort and Nested Case‐Control Studies of Hematopoietic Cancers and Brain Cancer among Electric Utility Workers , 1993, Epidemiology.

[6]  M Feychting,et al.  Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-voltage power lines. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  G Thériault,et al.  Cancer risks associated with occupational exposure to magnetic fields among electric utility workers in Ontario and Quebec, Canada, and France: 1970-1989. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  D. Savitz,et al.  11 – Epidemiologic Evidence on Cancer in Relation to Residential and Occupational Exposures , 1994 .

[9]  G Thériault,et al.  Occupational and residential 60-Hz electromagnetic fields and high-frequency electric transients: exposure assessment using a new dosimeter. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[10]  T D Bracken,et al.  Magnetic field exposure among utility workers. , 1995, Bioelectromagnetics.

[11]  D. Thomas,et al.  Exposure to magnetic fields among electrical workers in relation to leukemia risk in Los Angeles County. , 1994, American journal of industrial medicine.