Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry

Abstract The study seeks to investigate how students’ perceptions of peer feedback on their EFL writing change over time, the factors affecting their perceived usefulness of peer feedback for draft revision, and their opinions about the use of a rubric in the peer feedback practice. Fifty-three Chinese EFL learners, including six case study informants, participated in the study. The data collected consisted of questionnaires, interviews, and students’ reflective essays. The findings showed that the students’ perceived usefulness of peer feedback decreased over time, and that their perceived usefulness of peer feedback for draft revision was affected by five factors: (1) Students’ knowledge of assigned essay topics; (2) Students’ limited English proficiency; (3) Students’ attitudes towards the peer feedback practice; (4) Time constraints of the in-class peer feedback session; (5) Students’ concerns with interpersonal relationship. The students regarded the rubric as an explicit guide to evaluating their peers’ EFL writing, though negative perceptions were also reported. The paper ends with a discussion of the implementation of peer feedback in the Chinese EFL writing class and directions for future research.

[1]  Nuwar Mawlawi Diab,et al.  Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing , 2011 .

[2]  S. Hanrahan,et al.  Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views , 2001 .

[3]  George M. Jacobs,et al.  Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path , 1998 .

[4]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[5]  S. Sengupta.  Peer evaluation: ‘I am not the teacher’ , 1998 .

[6]  Zhenhui Rao.  Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills , 2007 .

[7]  Trena M. Paulus,et al.  The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing , 1999 .

[8]  Shuqiang Zhang.  Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 1995 .

[9]  Hui-Tzu Min,et al.  Training students to become successful peer reviewers , 2005 .

[10]  A. Tsui,et al.  Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments , 2000 .

[11]  H. Andrade,et al.  A review of rubric use in higher education , 2010 .

[12]  Randall W. Sadler,et al.  The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing , 2003 .

[13]  Sumie Matsuno,et al.  Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms , 2009 .

[14]  E. Berg,et al.  The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality , 1999 .

[15]  Kimi Kondo-Brown,et al.  A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance , 2002 .

[16]  David Carless,et al.  Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation? , 2010 .

[17]  Jun Liu,et al.  Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms , 2002 .

[18]  Martha C. Pennington,et al.  Explaining Hong Kong Students' Response to Process Writing: An Exploration of Causes and Outcomes. , 1996 .

[19]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Peer Revision in the L2 Classroom: Social-Cognitive Activities, Mediating Strategies, and Aspects of Social Behavior. , 1996 .

[20]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Effects of Training for Peer Response on Students' Comments and Interaction , 1995 .

[21]  David Carless,et al.  From Testing to Productive Student Learning: Implementing Formative Assessment in Confucian-Heritage Settings , 2010 .

[22]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. , 1994 .

[23]  H. Jacobs.  Testing Esl Composition: A Practical Approach , 1981 .

[24]  Goodith White,et al.  A process genre approach to teaching writing , 2000 .

[25]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? , 1994 .

[26]  Heidi Andrade,et al.  Student responses to criteria‐referenced self‐assessment , 2007 .

[27]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education , 1998 .

[28]  Richard Badger,et al.  A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class , 2006 .

[29]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction , 1996 .

[30]  Wei Zhu,et al.  INTERACTION AND FEEDBACK IN MIXED PEER RESPONSE GROUPS , 2001 .

[31]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups , 1998 .

[32]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Student revision with peer and expert reviewing , 2010 .

[33]  N. Caulk,et al.  Comparing Teacher and Student Responses to Written Work , 1994 .

[34]  C. Schunn,et al.  Commenting on Writing , 2006 .

[35]  H. Andrade.  Using Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning. , 2000 .

[36]  Nuwar Mawlawi Diab,et al.  Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts , 2010 .

[37]  Hui-Tzu Min,et al.  The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality , 2006 .

[38]  Harry Torrance.  Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. 1 , 2007 .

[39]  Annie Brown.  Self-Assessment of Writing in Independent Language Learning Programs: The Value of Annotated Samples. , 2005 .

[40]  Karen E. Johnson,et al.  Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction , 1994 .

[41]  Huahui Zhao,et al.  Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom , 2010 .

[42]  Ling Shi,et al.  Topical knowledge and ESL writing , 2012 .

[43]  Wei-Na Zhu,et al.  Triangulation in Classroom Research: A Study of Peer Revision , 1997 .

[44]  Paul Rollinson,et al.  Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 2005 .

[45]  Manami Suzuki,et al.  Japanese Learners' Self Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English. , 2008 .

[46]  Diane J. Tedick,et al.  ESL writing assessment: Subject-matter knowledge and its impact on performance , 1990 .

[47]  Guangwei Hu,et al.  Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers , 2005 .

[48]  Shuqiang Zhang,et al.  Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback , 1999 .

[49]  Tomoko Fujita,et al.  Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms , 2004 .

[50]  M. Rahimi.  Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing , 2013 .

[51]  J. Stanley.  Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators , 1992 .