A Follow‐up Study of the Characteristics of Dean's Letters
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Cooke,et al. A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behavior in medical students. University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Clinical Clerkships Operation Committee. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[2] M. Roberson,et al. The dishonest dean's letter: an analysis of 532 dean's letters from 99 U.S. medical schools. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[3] N. Wagoner,et al. Program directors' responses to a survey on variables used to select residents in a time of change. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[4] C. Maclaren,et al. Characteristics of dean's letters in 1981 and 1992 , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[5] D. Altman,et al. Comparing medical school graduates who perform poorly in residency with graduates who perform well , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[6] S. Smith. Correlations between graduates' performances as first‐year residents and their performances as medical students , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[7] D. Kassebaum,et al. Educational debt, specialty choices, and practice intentions of underrepresented‐minority medical school graduates , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[8] M. Hojat,et al. Further psychometric evaluations of a class‐ranking model as a predictor of graduates' clinical competence in the first year of residency , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[9] L. Arnold,et al. First‐year residents' performances compared with their medical school class ranks as determined by three ranking systems , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[10] D. Hunt. Functional and dysfunctional characteristics of the prevailing model of clinical evaluation systems in North American medical schools , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[11] M. Hojat,et al. Class ranking models for deans' letters and their psychometric evaluation. , 1991, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[12] J. Carline,et al. Comparing assessments of medical students' potentials as residents made by the residency directors and deans at two schools , 1991, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[13] N. Wagoner,et al. A new approach to standardizing the dean's letter , 1989, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[14] P. Yarnold,et al. Comparative performance information in the dean's letter. , 1988, Research in medical education : proceedings of the ... annual Conference. Conference on Research in Medical Education.
[15] L. Leiden,et al. National survey of writers of dean's letters for residency applications. , 1986, Journal of medical education.
[16] N. Wagoner,et al. Factors used by program directors to select residents. , 1986, Journal of medical education.
[17] J. Yager,et al. The quality of deans' letters from medical schools. , 1984, Journal of medical education.
[18] Friedman Rb. Sounding board. Fantasy land. , 1983 .
[19] N. Wagoner,et al. Report on a survey of program directors regarding selection factors in graduate medical education. , 1979, Journal of medical education.