A Follow‐up Study of the Characteristics of Dean's Letters

Purpose To assess the content and quality of dean's letters since the publication of guidelines recommended by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) in 1989. Method In 1998, the dean's letter writers at all 124 U.S. medical schools were surveyed. The questionnaire incorporated items from two previous surveys (1981 and 1992). In addition, samples of dean's letters (n = 451) from all U.S. medical schools for the graduating class of 1998 were rated based on the AAMC's guidelines. Results The response rate of the 1998 survey (66%) was lower than those of the two previous surveys (87% for 1992 and 85% for 1981). Schools that prepared letters that followed the AAMC's guidelines were somewhat more likely to have responded. According to the letter writers in 1998, close to 300,000 letters (approximately 1,050,000 pages total) were sent to residency directors, at an estimated cost of $26,000 per school. A total of 65% of schools produced adequate dean's letters based on the 1989 AAMC's guidelines, compared with 55% in 1992. Many schools were organizing the dean's letter in more readable formats, and more schools provided information that allowed for a comparison of students within the same school. Conclusion The improvements in dean's letters are encouraging, but ten years after the AAMC's guidelines, 35% of U.S. schools still produce unacceptable letters. With the addition of the electronic submission of information, it is time to review further improvements to the dean's letter.

[1]  M. Cooke,et al.  A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behavior in medical students. University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Clinical Clerkships Operation Committee. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  M. Roberson,et al.  The dishonest dean's letter: an analysis of 532 dean's letters from 99 U.S. medical schools. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  N. Wagoner,et al.  Program directors' responses to a survey on variables used to select residents in a time of change. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  C. Maclaren,et al.  Characteristics of dean's letters in 1981 and 1992 , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing medical school graduates who perform poorly in residency with graduates who perform well , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  S. Smith Correlations between graduates' performances as first‐year residents and their performances as medical students , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  D. Kassebaum,et al.  Educational debt, specialty choices, and practice intentions of underrepresented‐minority medical school graduates , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  M. Hojat,et al.  Further psychometric evaluations of a class‐ranking model as a predictor of graduates' clinical competence in the first year of residency , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  L. Arnold,et al.  First‐year residents' performances compared with their medical school class ranks as determined by three ranking systems , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[10]  D. Hunt Functional and dysfunctional characteristics of the prevailing model of clinical evaluation systems in North American medical schools , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  M. Hojat,et al.  Class ranking models for deans' letters and their psychometric evaluation. , 1991, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  J. Carline,et al.  Comparing assessments of medical students' potentials as residents made by the residency directors and deans at two schools , 1991, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  N. Wagoner,et al.  A new approach to standardizing the dean's letter , 1989, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  P. Yarnold,et al.  Comparative performance information in the dean's letter. , 1988, Research in medical education : proceedings of the ... annual Conference. Conference on Research in Medical Education.

[15]  L. Leiden,et al.  National survey of writers of dean's letters for residency applications. , 1986, Journal of medical education.

[16]  N. Wagoner,et al.  Factors used by program directors to select residents. , 1986, Journal of medical education.

[17]  J. Yager,et al.  The quality of deans' letters from medical schools. , 1984, Journal of medical education.

[18]  Friedman Rb Sounding board. Fantasy land. , 1983 .

[19]  N. Wagoner,et al.  Report on a survey of program directors regarding selection factors in graduate medical education. , 1979, Journal of medical education.