A history of randomized task designs in fMRI

In the early days of fMRI, data were acquired using methods adapted mainly from PET imaging. Sets of similar stimuli were presented in extended blocks, with stimulus conditions changing from block to block. While this method provided optimum statistical power, it also presented a variety of potential confounds, including changes in attention, alertness, expectancy, and practice effects within and between blocks. Event-related paradigms using unpredictable, randomized stimulus sequences had been used in EEG studies for over 50 years before the development of fMRI, and provided a means to overcome these issues. However, the temporal dispersion of BOLD fMRI activity resulted in responses to successive stimuli adding together, making it difficult to perform rapid event-related paradigms using fMRI. Here we describe the background and history of methods developed to overcome this limitation, allowing rapid, randomized stimulus sequences to be used with fMRI. The advantages and disadvantages of this technique and how these methods have been applied in a variety of experimental settings are discussed.

[1]  Joseph B. Sala,et al.  Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[3]  R. Galamboš,et al.  An electroencephalograph study of classical conditioning. , 1962, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  E Courchesne,et al.  In vivo myeloarchitectonic analysis of human striate and extrastriate cortex using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  R. Turner,et al.  Microstructural Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex: From Brodmann's Post-Mortem Map to in Vivo Mapping with High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2013 .

[6]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  P300 and slow wave from oddball and single-stimulus visual tasks: inter-stimulus interval effects. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Object Priming in Humans Revealed by Rapid Presentation Event-Related fMRI , 1998, Neuron.

[8]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Identification of Imaging Biomarkers in Schizophrenia: A Coefficient-constrained Independent Component Analysis of the Mind Multi-site Schizophrenia Study , 2010, Neuroinformatics.

[9]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Searching scale space for activation in PET images , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[10]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic Designs in Event-Related fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[12]  VD Calhoun,et al.  Cingulate and insula activity predict relapse in recovering stimulant addicts. , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Vincent P. Clark,et al.  Low-dose estradiol alters brain activity , 2005, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[14]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Hemodynamic nonlinearities affect BOLD fMRI response timing and amplitude , 2009, NeuroImage.

[15]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial Selective Attention Affects Early Extrastriate But Not Striate Components of the Visual Evoked Potential , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Investigation of relationships between fMRI brain networks in the spectral domain using ICA and Granger causality reveals distinct differences between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Digital Picture Processing, Volume 1 , 1982 .

[19]  C. Tomes CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS , 1903 .

[20]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Barth,et al.  Neuromagnetic localization of epileptiform spike activity in the human brain. , 1982, Science.

[23]  J. Rohrbaugh,et al.  Endogenous potentials generated in the human hippocampal formation and amygdala by infrequent events. , 1980, Science.

[24]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects , 2012, NeuroImage.

[25]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  Jeff H Duyn,et al.  Novel frontiers in ultra-structural and molecular MRI of the brain. , 2011, Current opinion in neurology.

[27]  V. Clark,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces localized and specific alterations in neurochemistry: A 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  E. Halgren,et al.  Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Investigating the post-stimulus undershoot of the BOLD signal—a simultaneous fMRI and fNIRS study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  Carles Escera,et al.  ERPs and behavioural indices of long-term preattentive and attentive deficits after closed head injury , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Visual area topography as revealed by fMRI vs. PET , 1996, NeuroImage.

[32]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[33]  B E Swartz,et al.  An 18FDG-PET study of cortical activation during a short-term visual memory task in humans. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[34]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A projection pursuit algorithm to classify individuals using fMRI data: Application to schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[35]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Effective connectivity analysis of fMRI and MEG data collected under identical paradigms , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[36]  S E Petersen,et al.  Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Ruth M. Cruikshank,et al.  Electro-Encephalography: II. Visual Stimulation and the After-Image as Affecting the Occipital Alpha Rhythm , 1937 .

[38]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging. II. Signal detection and statistical inference. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[39]  S Lai,et al.  Paradigm‐dependent modulation of event‐related fMRI activity evoked by the oddball task , 2001, Human brain mapping.