The Criterion Validity and Between-Day Reliability of the Perch for Measuring Barbell Velocity During Commonly Used Resistance Training Exercises

Abstract Weakley, J, Munteanu, G, Cowley, N, Johnston, R, Morrison, M, Gardiner, C, Pérez-Castilla, A, and García-Ramos, A. The criterion validity and between-day reliability of the Perch for measuring barbell velocity during commonly used resistance training exercises. J Strength Cond Res 37(4): 787–792, 2023—This study aimed to assess the criterion validity and between-day reliability (accounting for technological and biological variability) of mean and peak concentric velocity from the Perch measurement system. On 2 testing occasions, 16 subjects completed repetitions at 20, 40, 60, 80, 90, and 100% of 1-repetition maximum in the free-weight barbell back squat and bench press. To assess criterion validity, values from the Perch and a 3-dimensional motion capture system (criterion) were compared. Technological variability was assessed by determining whether the differences between the Perch and criterion for each load were comparable for both testing sessions, whereas between-day reliability with both technological and biological variability was calculated from Perch values across days. Generalized estimating equations were used to calculate R2 and root mean square error, whereas Bland-Altman plots assessed magnitude of difference between measures. To support monitoring of athletes over time, standard error of measurement and minimum detectable changes (MDC) were calculated. There was excellent agreement between the Perch and criterion device, with mean velocity in both exercises demonstrating a mean bias ranging from −0.01 to 0.01 m·s−1. For peak velocity, Perch underestimated velocity compared with the criterion ranging from −0.08 to −0.12 m·s−1 for the back squat and −0.01 to −0.02 m·s−1 for the bench press. Technological variability between-days were all less than the MDC. These findings demonstrate that the Perch provides valid and reliable mean and peak concentric velocity outputs across a range of velocities. Therefore, practitioners can confidently implement this device for the monitoring and prescription of resistance training.

[1]  Grant M. Duthie,et al.  The inter-device reliability of global navigation satellite systems during team sport movement across multiple days. , 2021, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[2]  Amador García-Ramos,et al.  Comparison of the two most commonly used gold-standard velocity monitoring devices (GymAware and T-Force) to assess lifting velocity during the free-weight barbell back squat exercise , 2021, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology.

[3]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Bench Press 1-Repetition Maximum Estimation Through the Individualized Load-Velocity Relationship: Comparison of Different Regression Models and Minimal Velocity Thresholds. , 2021, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[4]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Number of Repetitions Performed Before and After Reaching Velocity Loss Thresholds: First Repetition Versus Fastest Repetition-Mean Velocity Versus Peak Velocity. , 2021, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance.

[5]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review , 2021, Sports Medicine.

[6]  Grant M. Duthie,et al.  The Validity and Reliability of Wearable Microtechnology for Intermittent Team Sports: A Systematic Review , 2020, Sports Medicine.

[7]  B. Jones,et al.  Show Me, Tell Me, Encourage Me: The Effect of Different Forms of Feedback on Resistance Training Performance. , 2020, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Velocity Loss Thresholds Reliably Control Kinetic and Kinematic Outputs during Free Weight Resistance Training , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  J. Tufano,et al.  Superior Changes in Jump, Sprint, and Change-of-Direction Performance but Not Maximal Strength Following 6 Weeks of Velocity-Based Training Compared With 1-Repetition-Maximum Percentage-Based Training. , 2020, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[10]  Nathaniel T. Stevens,et al.  Using multiple agreement methods for continuous repeated measures data: a tutorial for practitioners , 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[11]  B. Jones,et al.  Testing methods and physical qualities of male age grade rugby union players: A systematic review , 2020, PloS one.

[12]  Amador García-Ramos,et al.  Velocity-Based Training: From Theory to Application , 2020, Strength & Conditioning Journal.

[13]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Criterion Validity, and Interunit and Between-Day Reliability of the FLEX for Measuring Barbell Velocity During Commonly Used Resistance Training Exercises. , 2020, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[14]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Reliability of the velocity achieved during the last repetition of sets to failure and its association with the velocity of the 1-repetition maximum , 2020, PeerJ.

[15]  S. McLaren,et al.  The Effects of 10%, 20%, and 30% Velocity Loss Thresholds on Kinetic, Kinematic, and Repetition Characteristics During the Barbell Back Squat. , 2020, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[16]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Application of velocity loss thresholds during free-weight resistance training: Responses and reproducibility of perceptual, metabolic, and neuromuscular outcomes , 2019, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  J. Sampson,et al.  The Effects of Augmented Feedback on Sprint, Jump, and Strength Adaptations in Rugby Union Players Following a Four Week Training Programme. , 2019, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[18]  Peter D. Mundy,et al.  The reliability and validity of the bar-mounted PUSH BandTM 2.0 during bench press with moderate and heavy loads , 2019, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Reliability and validity of different methods of estimating the one-repetition maximum during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise , 2019, Journal of sports sciences.

[20]  Ben Jones,et al.  Criterion Validity of Force and Power Outputs for a Commonly Used Flywheel Resistance Training Device and Bluetooth App , 2019, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[21]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models , 2019, PloS one.

[22]  William S. Helton,et al.  Presenting objective visual performance feedback over multiple sets of resistance exercise improves motivation, competitiveness, and performance , 2018, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

[23]  B. Jones,et al.  Jump Training in Rugby Union Players: Barbell or Hexagonal Bar? , 2018, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[24]  B. Jones,et al.  Reliability and Validity of a Medicine Ball–Contained Accelerometer for Measuring Upper-Body Neuromuscular Performance , 2018, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research.

[25]  Harry G. Banyard,et al.  Validity of Various Methods for Determining Velocity, Force, and Power in the Back Squat. , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[26]  William S. Helton,et al.  Real-time quantitative performance feedback during strength exercise improves motivation, competitiveness, mood, and performance , 2017 .

[27]  B. Jones,et al.  The effects of superset configuration on kinetic, kinematic, and perceived exertion in the barbell bench press. , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[28]  Kevin Till,et al.  Visual feedback attenuates mean concentric barbell velocity loss, and improves motivation, competitiveness, and perceived workload in male adolescent athletes. , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[29]  B. Jones,et al.  The Influence of Resistance Training Experience on the Between-Day Reliability of Commonly Used Strength Measures in Male Youth Athletes , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[30]  Kristin L. Sainani Reliability Statistics , 2017, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[31]  A. García-Ramos,et al.  Mean Velocity vs. Mean Propulsive Velocity vs. Peak Velocity: Which Variable Determines Bench Press Relative Load With Higher Reliability? , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[32]  B. Jones,et al.  Strength and Conditioning Practices in Adolescent Rugby Players: Relationship with Changes in Physical Qualities. , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[33]  W. MacNee,et al.  Application of Mixed Effects Limits of Agreement in the Presence of Multiple Sources of Variability: Exemplar from the Comparison of Several Devices to Measure Respiratory Rate in COPD Patients , 2016, PLoS ONE.

[34]  B. Zheng,et al.  Summarizing the goodness of fit of generalized linear models for longitudinal data. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.