Assessing accuracy of gas-driven permeability measurements: a comparative study of diverse Hassler-cell and probe permeameter devices

Abstract. Permeability is one of the most important petrophysical parameters to describe the reservoir properties of sedimentary rocks, pertaining to problems in hydrology, geothermics, and hydrocarbon reservoir analysis. Outcrop analogue studies, well core measurements, and individual sample analysis take advantage of a variety of commercially available devices for permeability measurements. Very often, permeability data derived from different devices need to be merged within one study (e.g. outcrop minipermeametry and lab-based core plug measurements). To enhance accuracy of different gas-driven permeability measurements, device-specific aberrations need to be taken into account. The application of simple one-to-one correlations may draw the wrong picture of permeability trends. For this purpose, transform equations need to be established. This study presents a detailed comparison of permeability data derived from a selection of commonly used Hassler cells and probe permeameters. As a result of individual cross-plots, typical aberrations and transform equations are elaborated, which enable corrections for the specific permeameters. Permeability measurements of the commercially available ErgoTech gas permeameter and the TinyPerm II probe permeameter are well-comparable over the entire range of permeability, with R2 = 0.955. Aberrations are mostly identified in the permeability range

[1]  C. Schüth,et al.  Matrix versus fracture permeability in a regional sandstone aquifer (Wajid sandstone, SW Saudi Arabia) , 2014, Grundwasser.

[2]  L. Klinkenberg.  The Permeability Of Porous Media To Liquids And Gases , 2012 .

[3]  R. Schultz,et al.  Conditions and implications for compaction band formation in the Navajo Sandstone, Utah , 2011 .

[4]  Haakon Fossen,et al.  Spatial variation of microstructure and petrophysical properties along deformation bands in reservoir sandstones , 2009 .

[5]  Alain Dassargues,et al.  Relating small-scale sedimentary structures and permeability in a cross-bedded aquifer , 2008 .

[6]  Per Schjønning,et al.  Field Application of a Portable Air Permeameter to Characterize Spatial Variability in Air and Water Permeability , 2003 .

[7]  T. Aigner,et al.  RESERVOIR ARCHITECTURE IN A TERMINAL ALLUVIAL PLAIN: AN OUTCROP ANALOGUE STUDY (UPPER TRIASSIC, SOUTHERN GERMANY) PART 1: SEDIMENTOLOGY AND PETROPHYSICS , 2002 .

[8]  D. K. Davies,et al.  Stress-dependent permeability: Characterization and modeling , 2001 .

[9]  F. Krause,et al.  A comparison of plug-derived and probe-derived permeability in cross-bedded sandstones of the Virgelle Member, Alberta, Canada: The influence of flow directions on probe permeametry , 2001 .

[10]  Brian J. Willis,et al.  Comparison of Outcrop and Subsurface Sandstone Permeability Distribution, Lower Cretaceous Fall River Formation, South Dakota and Wyoming , 1998 .

[11]  B. Willis.  Permeability Structure of a Compound Valley Fill in the Cretaceous Fall River Formation of South Dakota , 1998 .

[12]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Global scale-up of reservoir model permeability with local grid refinement , 1995 .

[13]  Andrew Hurst,et al.  Probe Permeametry: An Overview and Bibliography , 1995 .

[14]  Fred M. Phillips,et al.  A Portable Air‐Minipermeameter for Rapid In Situ Field Measurements , 1994 .

[15]  D. Goggin.  Probe permeametry: is it worth the effort? , 1993 .

[16]  Paul F. Worthington,et al.  Recommended practice for probe permeametry , 1993 .

[17]  T. Dreyer,et al.  Minipermeameter-Based Study of Permeability Trends in Channel Sand Bodies (1) , 1990 .

[18]  L. Lake,et al.  A Mechanical Field Permeameter for Making Rapid, Non-Destructive, Permeability Measurements: RESEARCH METHOD PAPER , 1989 .

[19]  M. Grant.  Geothermal Reservoir Engineering , 1982 .

[20]  Don C. Ward,et al.  Effect of Overburden Pressure and Water Saturation on Gas Permeability of Tight Sandstone Cores , 1972 .

[21]  R. Eijpe,et al.  Mini-Permeameters for Consolidated Rock and Unconsolidated Sand: GEOLOGICAL NOTE , 1971 .

[22]  Xiao-Hui Wu,et al.  Challenges and Technologies in Reservoir Modeling , 2009 .

[23]  J. Sharp,et al.  An Electronic Minipermeameter for Use in the Field and Laboratory , 1994 .

[24]  P. Corbett,et al.  Variation Of Reservoir Statistics According To Sample Spacing And Measurement Type For Some Intervals In The Lower Brent Group , 1992 .

[25]  R. Tye,et al.  Depositional, Diagenetic, and Structural Controls on Reservoir Properties of Low-Permeability Sandstone, Travis Peak Formation, East Texas , 1991 .

[26]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  A theoretical and experimental analysis of minipermeameter response including gas slippage and high velocity flow effects , 1988 .

[27]  P. Aitcin,et al.  Air Permeability Measurement , 1988 .

[28]  M. Grant.  Chapter 1 – Geothermal Reservoirs , 1982 .

[29]  G. Keller.  Exploration for Geothermal Energy , 1981 .

[30]  A. Roll.  Bramberge Field, Federal Republic of Germany: Case Histories , 1972 .

[31]  R. King.  Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields—Classification, Exploration Methods, and Case Histories , 1972 .