Virtual food components: functional food effects expressed as food components

Background: The ability to communicate food benefits is essential for the successful development of functional foods and their role in improving public health. However, the functional efficacy of foods often cannot be represented by food composition. The concept of virtual food components (VFCs)—food data that express health-related effects, properties or functions of foods in the format of food components—is therefore proposed.Objective: To develop protocols for designing VFC data sets that communicate functional efficacies of foods to end users, in order to facilitate evidence-based food choice, and allow data management systems to provide a more complete description of nutritional effects of foods than has been possible with values for actual food components alone.Method: A framework within which to develop VFCs was constructed, linking food choice to health end points. It involves scientific validation, generation of relative indices, their translation into a meaningful language based on equivalents to known and understood reference foods, followed by data consolidation and ecological validation. Criteria used to evaluate VFCs were importance, independence, validity, accuracy, robustness, sensitivity, linearity/additivity, relevance, comprehensiveness, acquirability, completeness, meaningfulness, acceptability and safety. The developmental framework and evaluative criteria were applied to glycaemic glucose equivalents (GGE), a VFC representing postprandial glycaemia, and to wheat bran equivalents for faecal bulk (WBEfb), a VFC representing faecal bulking efficacy.Results: VFCs were used to identify foods according to health-related effects that cannot be accurately predicted from food composition data, and were used in a nutrition management system to concurrently show nutrient intake and physiological effects in the same units. The proposed evaluative criteria identified points requiring further research, and showed that lack of integrity-tested VFC data is an immediate challenge.Conclusion: VFCs are a means of communicating relative functional efficacy of foods as a continuous variable, and provide end users with a more accurate and complete view of the health effects of foods than can be provided by health claims or food composition data alone.Sponsorship: New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology.

[1]  P M Verschuren,et al.  Functional foods: scientific and global perspectives. , 2002, The British journal of nutrition.

[2]  J A Marlett,et al.  Mechanisms by which wheat bran and oat bran increase stool weight in humans. , 1998, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  S A Bingham,et al.  Fecal weight, colon cancer risk, and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (dietary fiber) , 1992, Gastroenterology.

[4]  J. Monro,et al.  7 – New approaches to providing nutritional information , 2002 .

[5]  L. Niskanen,et al.  Postprandial glucose, insulin, and incretin responses to grain products in healthy subjects. , 2002, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  J. Monro Faecal bulking index: A physiological basis for dietary management of bulk in the distal colon. , 2000, Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition.

[7]  J. Miller,et al.  International tables of glycemic index. , 1995, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  L. R. Hackler,et al.  Dietary fiber. , 1976, The Journal of nutrition.

[9]  A. Diplock,et al.  Scientific Concepts of Functional Foods in Europe Consensus Document , 1999, British Journal of Nutrition.

[10]  T. Perry,et al.  Glycaemic glucose equivalent: validation as a predictor of the relative glycaemic effect of foods , 2003, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[11]  G A Colditz,et al.  Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. , 1997, JAMA.

[12]  J. Monro Glycaemic glucose equivalent: combining carbohydrate content, quantity and glycaemic index of foods for precision in glycaemia management. , 2002, Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  M. Roberfroid,et al.  Concepts and strategy of functional food science: the European perspective. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[14]  J. Shaw,et al.  Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic , 2001, Nature.

[15]  R. Oniang’o Fibre: Implications for the consumer , 1998 .

[16]  I. Björck Starch: Nutritional Aspects , 2006 .

[17]  J. Milner,et al.  Functional foods: the US perspective. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  J. Monro Adequate intake values for dietary fibre based on faecal bulking indexes of 66 foods , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[19]  J. Monro Available Carbohydrate and Glycemic Index Combined in New Data Sets for Managing Glycemia and Diabetes , 1999 .

[20]  M. Brownlee Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications , 2001, Nature.

[21]  F. Clydesdale A proposal for the establishment of scientific criteria for health claims for functional foods. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[22]  P. Ellis,et al.  A physico-chemical perspective of plant polysaccharides in relation to glucose absorption, insulin secretion and the entero-insular axis , 1996, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[23]  H. Hauner,et al.  Insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome—a challenge of the new millennium† , 2002, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[24]  B. Schneeman,et al.  Gastrointestinal physiology and functions. , 2002, The British journal of nutrition.

[25]  J. Weststrate,et al.  Functional foods, trends and future. , 2002, The British journal of nutrition.

[26]  J. Monro Faecal bulking efficacy of Australasian breakfast cereals. , 2002, Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[27]  B. Schneeman Dietary fiber and gastrointestinal function , 1998 .

[28]  J. Monro Dietary fibre content and nutrient claims relative to the faecal bulking efficacy of breakfast cereals. , 2002, Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition.

[29]  J. Monro,et al.  Concurrent management of postprandial glycaemia and nutrient intake using glycaemic glucose equivalents, food composition data and computer-assisted meal design. , 2000, Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition.

[30]  J. Cummings The Effect of Dietary Fiber on Fecal Weight and Composition , 2001 .

[31]  J. Mann,et al.  Glycaemic index of New Zealand foods. , 2000, The New Zealand medical journal.

[32]  J. Monro Evidence-based food choice: the need for new measures of food effects , 2000 .

[33]  I. Johnson,et al.  Effect of oat gum on the physical properties of the gastrointestinal contents and on the uptake of D-galactose and cholesterol by rat small intestine in vitro , 1989, British Journal of Nutrition.

[34]  Kaye Foster-Powell,et al.  International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. , 2002, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[35]  T. Wolever,et al.  The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications. , 1991, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[36]  J. Monro Wheat bran equivalents based on faecal bulking indices for dietary management of faecal bulk. , 2001, Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition.

[37]  J. Muir,et al.  Dietary intake and faecal excretion of carbohydrate by Australians: importance of achieving stool weights greater than 150 g to improve faecal markers relevant to colon cancer risk , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.