Basic Rules for Indoor Anechoic Chamber Design

E very year, many requests for proposals for an anechoic chamber are generated by companies and institutions that perform antenna measurements. The task of adequately specifying performance for an indoor anechoic chamber without driving unnecessary costs or specifying contradictory requirements requires insight that is not always available to the author of the specification. Although there are some articles and books that address anechoic chamber design [1]–[3], a concise compendium of reference information and rules of thumb on the subject of specifying ranges would be useful. This article intends to be a helpful tool in that regard. It starts by recommending the proper type of range for different antenna types and frequencies of operation. Rules of thumb are provided to select the best approach for the required test or antenna type. Information is provided on the derivations needed for other ranges, such as compact ranges and near-field test facilities. Simple approximations are used for absorber performance to generate a series of charts that can be used as a guide to specify anechoic chamber performance and size. Company and institution facilities can then define the appropriate square footage necessary to house the required antenna range. This article intends to avoid some of the common contradictory requirements. Some of these contradictory requirements are not enough real estate to accommodate a chamber operating at low frequencies or levels that are not possible given available absorber technology.

[1]  A. Yaghjian An overview of near-field antenna measurements , 1986 .

[2]  Walter D. Burnside,et al.  Performance trade-off between serrated edge and blended rolled edge compact range reflectors , 1996 .

[3]  D. Pinchera,et al.  An Ultra Wide Permittivity Antenna (UWPA) for Reliable Through-Wall Communications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[4]  C. Holloway,et al.  A low-frequency model for wedge or pyramid absorber arrays-I: theory , 1994 .

[5]  A. Papiernik,et al.  Simple model for the input impedance of coax-fed rectangular microstrip patch antenna for CAD , 1988 .

[6]  Shaoqiu Xiao,et al.  Capacitively Loaded Circularly Polarized Implantable Patch Antenna for ISM Band Biomedical Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[7]  Ramesh Garg,et al.  Resonant frequency of electrically thick rectangular microstrip antennas , 1987 .

[8]  Y.P. Zhang,et al.  Circuit model of microstrip patch antenna on ceramic land grid array package for antenna-chip codesign of highly integrated RF transceivers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  T. Dogaru,et al.  Measured Complex Permittivity of Walls with Different Hydration Levels and the Effect on Power Estimation of Twri Target Returns , 2011 .

[10]  H. King,et al.  Characteristics of a tapered anechoic chamber , 1967 .

[11]  W. Burnside,et al.  Chebyshev multilevel absorber design concept , 1997 .

[12]  Jing Zhang,et al.  A Cylindrical Conformal Directional Monopole Antenna for Borehole Radar Application , 2012, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[13]  L.H. Hemming,et al.  Electromagnetic Anechoic Chambers: A Fundamental Design and Specification Guide [Book Review] , 2002, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

[14]  Ingo Wolff,et al.  Rectangular and Circular Microstrip Disk Capacitors and Resonators , 1974 .

[15]  Andrea Francesco Morabito,et al.  Effects of lossy background and rebars on antennas embedded in concrete structures , 2016 .

[16]  M. Deshpande,et al.  Input impedance of microstrip antennas , 1982 .

[17]  G. Thiele,et al.  Antenna theory and design , 1981 .

[18]  W. H. Emerson,et al.  An improved design for indoor ranges , 1965 .

[19]  John Hansen,et al.  Evaluate Antenna Measurement Methods , 2010 .

[20]  Jeffrey A. Fordham,et al.  Effects of a Non-Ideal Plane Wave on Compact Range Measurements , 2014 .